Re: Dealing with growing FAQs

Kent Landfield (Kent_Landfield@sterling.com)
Tue, 28 Jun 94 9:35:01 CDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Kent Landfield: "Re: Dealing with growing FAQs"
Previous message: Bob Allison: "FAQ Size"
In reply to: Steve Summit: "Re: Dealing with growing FAQs"
Next in thread: mathew: "Re: Dealing with growing FAQs"

>
> In <9406271247.AA6391@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>, Tom Koenig wrote:
> > Another datapoint to the 60k limit... here's part of the son of 1036,
> > which is likely to become the next News standard.

Keyword used there... likely... It is not the standard today. I am sure
that some form of it will be sometime in the future but people treate this
as gospel today. Ask Henry, it is still in draft stages and then needs to
begin the IETF process where anything can happen. I disagree with inclusion
of the SHOULD usage and feel that it should be reworded to recommend. The
fact is that Steve is correct to point out the direct contradiction between
the two parts. Contradictions such as these still need to survive the IETF
process before becoming a RFC that obsoletes RFC1036.

-Kent+

-- 
Kent Landfield                        INTERNET: kent_landfield@sterling.com
Sterling Software                     UUCP:     uunet!kent || sparky!kent
Phone: (402) 291-8300                 FAX:     (402) 291-4362
Please send comp.sources.misc-related mail to kent@uunet.uu.net.

Next message: Kent Landfield: "Re: Dealing with growing FAQs"
Previous message: Bob Allison: "FAQ Size"
In reply to: Steve Summit: "Re: Dealing with growing FAQs"
Next in thread: mathew: "Re: Dealing with growing FAQs"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]