Re: Dealing with growing FAQs

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Tom Galloway: "Re: Dealing with growing FAQs"
• Previous message: Jef Poskanzer: "Re: Dealing with growing FAQs"
• In reply to: Larry W. Virden, x2487: "Dealing with growing FAQs"
• Next in thread: Larry W. Virden, x2487: "Re: Dealing with growing FAQs"
• Next in thread: Tom Galloway: "Re: Dealing with growing FAQs"
• Reply: Larry W. Virden, x2487: "Re: Dealing with growing FAQs"

> This 60k limit on postings is really a pain.

The 60k limit is in the mind of the masses and not the software. It was
a real problem 5 years ago but it does not seem to matter today. Vixie
(comp.sources.unix) and I (comp.sources.misc) have been successfully
posting articles at the 90K limit for over a year (actually close to two).
Go take a look. I have not had one (not one) single person complain to me
about postings they don't get, truncated posting or other 60k limit
related problems.

-Kent+

-- 
Kent Landfield                        INTERNET: kent_landfield@sterling.com
Sterling Software                     UUCP:     uunet!kent || sparky!kent
Phone: (402) 291-8300                 FAX:     (402) 291-4362
Please send comp.sources.misc-related mail to kent@uunet.uu.net.

• Next message: Tom Galloway: "Re: Dealing with growing FAQs"
• Previous message: Jef Poskanzer: "Re: Dealing with growing FAQs"
• In reply to: Larry W. Virden, x2487: "Dealing with growing FAQs"
• Next in thread: Larry W. Virden, x2487: "Re: Dealing with growing FAQs"
• Next in thread: Tom Galloway: "Re: Dealing with growing FAQs"
• Reply: Larry W. Virden, x2487: "Re: Dealing with growing FAQs"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]