|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P. Michael McCulley | mcculley@netcom.com | 619-587-8911 FAX: 619-546-3919
GENESIS Information Services | 6866 Weller St | San Diego, CA 92122
* For brochure, anon FTP ftp.netcom.com cd /pub/GIS get GENBrochure *
* Columnist, "Internet Waves" in INFORMATION TODAY *
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
On Mon, 18 Jul 1994, Britt Klein wrote:
> I just received email asking for clarification on one of my FAQs. Not the
> large gaming one, nor the miniatures painting one, but the 80-line mini-FAQ
> I put out erratically on .signature files. The questioner found the FAQ not
> online, either, but in the June issue of Internet World magazine.
>
> This was the first I'd known it was published.
>
> I'm ecstatic, actually. Not in the slightest upset that nobody asked or
> informed me, because the short FAQ was put together exclusively to help
> new users with their .signatures. I'd just like to know if anyone else
> has ever had this happen with this magazine, and if they respond favourably
> to requests for a copy of the issue in which a person's material was
> published (note the date, the July/August issue has been out for _weeks_
> and nobody has a June issue anymore).
>
> I'll not listen to anyone yelping that my copyright has been infringed -
> that's not the purpose of the short FAQ. If some .sig overusers see it
> in the magazine and learn better .signature usage, then the FAQ is doing
> precisely what it was intended for. This post isn't a complaint in any
> fashion. I just want to know if I'll get my copy.
>
> - Britt
> --
> No
>
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved