Re: My $0.02 on selling FAQs

---------

David Barr (barr@pop.psu.edu)
Tue, 18 Jan 1994 13:50:19 -0500


[ ugh, I really have been holding back on posting on this thread ]
In message <Pine.3.87.9401181003.S16195-0100000@vector.casti.com>, David Casti
writes:
>I've watched this discussion with some interest because while I'll never
>make money off my FAQs, I am very interested in how the net is changing
>intellectual property law.

The net is not changing intellectual property law, to my knowledge.
The net is _being_ changed more by the changes in law, I'd wager.

>However, regardless of what the law might say, I *personally* feel that
>anything *I* post to the net enters the public domain instantly.

Then you should say so in your postings. To all the signers of the
Berne convention treaty, your postings are *copyrighted* material
unless stated otherwise. (as well as your e-mail)

> I
>realize that many, perhaps most, people don't agree with me.

I'm using your copyrighted e-mail to form another copyrighted e-mail
message. (which falls under "fair use") Copyrights are not a stamp
of death. They are to protect ownership.

>Using two fairly common usenet analogies, I think it is pointless and
>unenforceable to get upset with people who make photocopies of the flier
>you stapled to every telephone pole in sight. Once something been dropped
>onto the net, there is no way to trace or track that information -- you
>might as well drop leaflets from an airplane.

To use another net analogy, this time in real life:

At one time, Apple Computer distributed the operating system to Macintoshes
FREE via anonymous FTP. They in a broadcasted it over the net, with
no controls. Are you saying that the OS is public domain?

--Dave



[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@landfield.com

© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved