Re: Compromise on CD-ROM FAQ issue?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Mike Meyer: "Re: The letter is way off base..."
• Previous message: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Compromise on CD-ROM FAQ issue?"
• In reply to: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Compromise on CD-ROM FAQ issue?"
• Next in thread: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Compromise on CD-ROM FAQ issue?"
• Reply: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Compromise on CD-ROM FAQ issue?"

> > Redistribution: not-cdrom
>
> This would miss what for me is the entire point.

Maybe. It was only a suggestion. Take it or leave it.

> If Walnut Creek won't honor copyrights -- won't even comply with the bleedin'
> *law* -- then what reason do we have to believe that they will honor a
> header of this kind?

They have been receptive to requests in the past to remove material from
their CD-ROM's. I don't see why they'd refuse to honor such a header if
we asked them as a group.

Cheers,

Rhys.

-- 
Rhys Weatherley, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
E-mail: rhys@fit.qut.edu.au  "net.maturity is knowing when NOT to followup"

• Next message: Mike Meyer: "Re: The letter is way off base..."
• Previous message: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Compromise on CD-ROM FAQ issue?"
• In reply to: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Compromise on CD-ROM FAQ issue?"
• Next in thread: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Compromise on CD-ROM FAQ issue?"
• Reply: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Compromise on CD-ROM FAQ issue?"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]