Re: gas for the FAQ fire.

---------

David Barr (barr@pop.psu.edu)
Thu, 07 Apr 1994 09:41:53 -0400


In message <9404070543.AA19695@mik.uky.edu>, ron c carman writes:
> You've stated the problem exactly when you say that these CDs
>are "a subset of Usenet articles". They are a *subset*, not the
>full Usenet.

BFD. Since when is an incomplete Usenet feed not Usenet?

Shall we go after all those sites that don't carry all newsgroups
because they're in violation of someone's made up rules?

> If someone wants to sell "Usenet-groups-on-disk", that's fine
>and dandy, so long as they include on that disk *every* article
>posted to the group they're selling.

I don't see why. What if their target audience is only computer-related?
They would just bundle up comp.*.

> What Walnut Creek is doing, OTOH, is picking and choosing
>which articles to include, based on their value to Walnut Creek.

Perhaps, that's the job of any good editor.

>If I wanted to write a book, I couldn't just go out and get
>"The Great Gatsby", "Without Remorse", and a few other hot titles
>and put them in one binding and sell them for a profit!

You don't? It's been done before. Many many times.

--Dave



[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@landfield.com

© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved