INFORMAL WORKING NOTES--"STAMPS" - INTERVIEWS WITH (DELETED) ET AL.

Created: 9/25/1987

OCR scan of the original document, errors are possible

AL

FORATfc : 4

eptember 7

WORKINGInterviews wjthj*

et al.

Before interviewing five of the principals in theontacted OGC

utttore the incecviewsi

'i without identifying myself', and s<ead in TIN' fUgaTlne that you have one of the Rush Lamp invert stamps. ee it?" He replied, "It'sold it.- Byonfirmed the Time and UPI reports that he said he hadtamp and his identity and location.

3. Onnterviewed!

| in I-

explained To each that the Inspector General had assumed responsibility for the official Agency investigation of the case and that my Job was (a) to assure the Inspector General that the investigation of the case by the Office of Security had been complete and proper, (b) to complete the investigation, if necessary, and (c) to recommend to the Inspector General what additional administrative action the Agency should take in the case, if any. I invited each of them to ask any questions or make any statements that they might want to make to me, as an impartial outside investigator, that they might not have wanted to make to previous investigators and questioners.

4. Each of them asked what the issue was,eplied to each of them that the issuesurrently undrstand them are:

" Were any laws broken when they sold the stamps or took possession of the stamps that they retained? Did those acts constitute conversion of government property for profit? Their Individual opinions or opinions that have been expressed by theur panjijor s

CONFIDEV

ace only opinions, but the Office of the General Counsel is cooperating with the Department of Justice in determining what laws, if any, were broken.

" Here anyroken by those who lied or failed to reveal the whole truth when they said that the unsold stamps were used as postage? (because itrime to lie to an official government investigator.)

5. IX interviewed first,

could pass any of this information along to any of the others so they would know what was happening

rLme forvcii lyauwi

explain. I [said that the investigator for the Bureau of Engraving "ana Printing, Mr. Oglesby, had threatened both

^jand f saying that if they did not tell him llioy worked, he would, take them to court. When:

'Mr. 0ale"3oJv and "Vve-rf'tually" asked

related trie

said that Mr. Oglesby could not nave taken them to court.

7. Questionsdesigned to pursue

the issues ot how many stampsreplaced ond when thoy were replaced.

| toldP ecided to step in: and everttually dia tell hia where they worjed. Mr. Oglesbv had lied?

incidentho

Question l_ Who bought the replacement

0-: How many did he hink it.

q. : how much money did you give him to buy the replacement

One hundred dollars.

So how many did you replace?

A.: ut 95 in the drawer.

hat did you do with the other ept them..

A

did the funds come from for the purchase? From my own funds. ften use my own funds to buy stamps when we need themurry and when getting an advanceould take too long.) Jnen the

f

thers reimbursed me,who did not pay because they used their

"annual leave to go to New Jersey-

Exactly when didthe replacements?

Probably Monday or Tuesday or the week folUjwingthe discovery of the possible misprint;nd IT ]went to the Annandale stamp dealer, we" replaced The^stamps before we knew they were valuable.

the other seven of you theeplacementelicve so.

share equally chc cost of

you get a receipt froa the post office when you bought the replacement stamps? do you haveid not keep it. whateed it for?

At what post office were the replacement stampson't know; usually we bought them at the Dunn Coring post office.

A

0 ft

At w(

replacementon't know.

Was it during the day or after working hours?

It was probably in the morning. He wouldn't have gone

after hours.

one

you would liko tohis thing hasroportion. s point

lhaa re1

answer any

6. Questions to establish whether or"hothe invert stamps were doneanswers. At thehad letairW

earned anuestions, but that questions were asked. At theere under cover intends to tell him my name.

iment time ands wil'li

were designed to activities in disposing of 'rnmejit time and_to check

_>

ttorney wanted

tated that to

what

f theasked in thopparently as he apparently requested.

Exactly when did you go to the Annandale stamp The same day we discovered the possible misprint, after work.

when waa this

L n

.: The came day.

ten was _this in relation to the day you called to look at the stamps?

what day did: Tho same day.

y the replacement

conpitmntlal

the

day did you andto new jersey?

n^xt dav or the day after that; april first or

the

what time of dayeplacement stamps? during the day, or after nours? during the day: during working hours.

do you know how many stamps were replaced? ninety-five.

who contributed to the cost oftfrearnow, allmyself,

7.

through

workK knows

because we used our annual leave to go to new jersey,

ow xs normal several

jinvoln rfc-rio at-ed matter

ay on work-related matters.

asked that any future contact be because none of the people wherehis situation. ontact each other

had the right to se lie said this incident bothered by the way os

stated at the outset that he believes he the stamps after they had been replaced, has been blown out ot proportion. he is has handled it: someone in os told him the stamps did and do belong to the us government. he does not believe that and welcomed my statement that doj was making that determindtion .

when exactly did you go to annandale?

early in the week. maybe wednesday. or thursday

after work.

can you give me the name ot the^ave his card,?

hen exactly did you go to new the following monday- i'm almost sure.

your

0,: you have said that you gave as far as you know, does yes, i'm almost sure he hasn't sold it.

issues

"ireaction to my outlining the rn! lying when he said the unso

he

o say that ne wai> stamps were used as postage; ot them were not. triefinq on howand contacted hiw-

lying when ne saia tncstill does not know thatnterviewed him, he thought co" respond in case the press got his it did not seemeal investigation where he was required to answer an investigator

questions fully. he said there was no criminal intent on his

CONFIu^SiLIAi.

pact. of his

Q

:

A.:

A.

Q-A.

0-A.

Questions directedlaim to have lost

1opy of your signed statement that you lost the stamp you kept. Do you still claim you lost it?

Yes.

Do you recognize the name No-

told the press that he bought one of the stamps IA man. YOU don't know him?

Questions

HO.

T(by telephone) :

give you to buy the

Bow much money did

replacement stamps/ Ninety-five dollars.

How many replacement stamps did you buy? Ninety-five.

What day did you buy the replacement stamps in relation to the day the misprint was noticed? The sane day.

At approximately what time of day did you buy the replacement stamps?

Betweennd 2. It might have been during my lunch hour.

0

Five of you have not turned in the stamps you kepi. Do you know if any of the stamps retained by any of you have been sold.?

o not know of any stamp sale by any of the five

A.

Q-A.

Q-A.

Q-A.

Q-A.

you know the name Yes.

In what connection? Ho was on television.

What did he do on television?

He was talking about the misprinted stamps.

What did he say about them?

di<

J3

I don't know. I didn't see the program.

hen how did you know about it

Jcack in the middle

told me about

art in the middlenis scMiwufce.)

ce

1

Tor

11. Time and attendance Office of Finance,

gnedours annual leave and

; igned

ravelled to New Jersey on 2

4 hours annual leave. Testimony taken by tne uurcau of Engraving and printing investigator supports the conclusion

f

5

S

i

Original document.

Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: