SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended January 31, 2012
.TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
For the transition period from ___________ to _____________
EXCLUSIVE BUILDING SERVICES, INC.
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
914 Park Knoll Lane, Katy, Texas 77450
(Address of principal executive office)
(Issuers telephone number)
Check whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2)has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X . No .
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer . Accelerated Filer . Non-Accelerated Filer . Smaller Reporting Company X .
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Yes ..No X . .
EXCLUSIVE BUILDING SERVICES, INC.
January 31, 2012
EXCLUSIVE BUILDING SERVICES, INC.
JANUARY 31, 2012 and JULY 31, 2011
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
EXCLUSIVE BUILDING SERVICES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY31, 2012 AND 2011
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
EXCLUSIVE BUILDING SERVICES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2012 AND 2011
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
EXCLUSIVE BUILDING SERVICES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2012 AND 2011
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
EXCLUSIVE BUILDING SERVICES, INC.
Notes to the Financial Statements
January 31, 2012 and 2011
NOTE 1 ORGANIZATION
Exclusive Building Services, Inc. (the Company) was founded as an unincorporated DBA in February 1997 and was incorporated as a C corporation under the laws of the State of Nevada on October 11, 2010. The incorporation effort included the Company issuing 312,500,000 shares of common stock to Patricia G. Skarpa, who founded and managed the business which had been operating continuously as a DBA since February 1997, and 9,375,000 shares to Hallie Beth Skarpa, its other director, for services rendered. These services, involving the incorporation and planning, were valued at $10,300. All numbers of shares give retroactive effect to a 31.25 for 1 forward split of shares approved by the Board on February 29, 2012. Hallie Beth Skarpa is the daughter of Patricia G. Skarpa. The day-to-day operations of the Company did not change as a result of the change in legal structure.
Since starting operations in 1997, the Company has provided commercial cleaning services to office buildings of 10,000 to 15,000 square feet in Harris County, TX (part of the greater Houston area).
The transaction in which the unincorporated DBA became a newly-incorporated entity has been accounted for in a manner similar to a recapitalization for financial accounting purposes. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared as if the transaction had occurred on the first day of the first period (August 1, 2008) included in the financial statements, and all operating data represents an ongoing continuation of the Companys operations as a DBA.
NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Interim financial statements
The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) set forth in Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Unaudited interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2011 and notes thereto contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Common Share
Net loss per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic and diluted net income per common share has been calculated by dividing the net income for the period by the basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding assuming that the Company incorporated as of the beginning of the first period presented. There were no dilutive shares outstanding at January 31, 2012 or 2011.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
There were no new accounting pronouncements that had a significant impact on the Companys operating results or financial position.
NOTE 3 GOING CONCERN
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had negative working capital and a net stockholders deficit at January 31, 2012 and had no source of debt or equity financing.
While the Company is attempting to generate additional revenues, the Companys cash position may not be significant enough to support the Companys daily operations. Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate additional revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to increase revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The Companys ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to achieve profitable operations or obtain adequate financing.
The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
NOTE 4 SHARE CAPITAL
In August 2011, the Company issued 37,500,000 common shares registered in a Registration Statement on Form S-1 that was declared effective by the SEC on August 18, 2011 to settle consulting and professional fees of $12,000. The expenses of $12,000 are included in General and administrative expenses for the six months ended January 31, 2012.
There are 359,375,000 shares of common stock outstanding at January 31, 2012 after giving retroactive effect to the 31.25 for 1 forward split described below..
In February 2012, the Company approved a 31.25 for 1 forward split of its common stock effective March 17, 2012, after which there will be 359,375,000 shares of common stock outstanding. The Company also increased the number of authorized shares to 500,000,000. All disclosures of numbers of shares give retroactive effect to this forward split. The earnings per share and the weighted average number of shares disclosed in the financial statements have been retroactively restated in accordance with SFAS 128.
NOTE 5 PRINCIPAL CUSTOMER
One customer, which is not related to or affiliated with the Company, comprised all of the Company's revenue in each of the fiscal periods ended January 31, 2012 and 2011. The work that is provided to this customer is performed under verbal agreements that could be terminated at any time. If the Company lost that customer, or if the amount of work that the Company performs for it decreases significantly, the Companys operations are likely to fail.
NOTE 6 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company neither owns nor leases any real or personal property. The Company's office is provided to it by its President who incurs no incremental costs as a result of the Company using the space. Therefore, she does not charge for its use. The Companys President also provides all the vacuum and buffing equipment used by the Company. Her compensation is assumed to cover the use of the office and equipment and supplies. There is no written lease agreement, and no obligation for her to continue this arrangement.
If the Company lacks sufficient resources to pay its legal expenses associated with its registration statement and obtaining a trade symbol within six months of those expenses being billed, the Companys president has agreed to sign a personal promissory note due and payable to the Companys counsel upon terms negotiated at the time of note issuance. The promissory note will eliminate unpaid liabilities on the Companys books equal to the face amount of the personal promissory note. The legal expenses will not be earned by counsel or billed until and unless a trade symbol is received.
NOTE 7 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In accordance with ASC 855, Subsequent Events, the Company has evaluated subsequent events from February 1, 2012 through March 13, 2012, the date of issuance of the financial statements and has determined it does not have any material subsequent events to disclose other than the forward split of its common shares disclosed in Note 4.
Item 2. Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain matters discussed herein are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q involve risks and uncertainties, including statements as to:
our future operating results;
our business prospects;
any contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties;
the dependence of our future success on the general economy;
any possible financings; and
the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital.
These forward-looking statements can generally be identified as such because the context of the statement will include words such as we believe," anticipate, expect, estimate or words of similar meaning. Similarly, statements that describe our future plans, objectives or goals are also forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which are described in close proximity to such statements and which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated as of the date of filing of this Form 10-Q. Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged to consider these factors in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included herein are only made as of the date of filing of this Form 10-Q, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION
We were founded as an unincorporated DBA in February 1997 and were incorporated as a C corporation under the laws of the State of Nevada on October 11, 2010. The incorporation effort included the Company issuing 312,500,000 shares of common stock to Patricia G. Skarpa, who founded and managed the business which had been operating continuously as an unincorporated DBA since February 1997, and 9,375,000 shares to Hallie Beth Skarpa, our other director, for services rendered. These services involving the incorporation planning were valued at $10,300. HallieBeth Skarpa is the daughter of Patricia G. Skarpa. The day-to-day operations of the Company did not change as a result of the change in legal structure.
Our independent registered auditors included an explanatory paragraph in their opinion on our financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2011 and 2010 that states that this lack of resources causes substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. To maintain operations as a going concern, we are keeping day-to-day operating costs to a minimum and seeking leads for new revenue opportunities. We hope that being a public company will provide us with additional credibility to help our efforts. However, no assurances can be given that we will have any success in our efforts or will remain as a going concern.
At January 31, 2012, we provide commercial cleaning services to one commercial building. We have provided the same level and range of cleaning services for this building for three nights a week during each of the fiscal periods ended January 31, 2012 and 2011. We have not provided any other significant services during that two-year period of time. Therefore, our business operations are virtually identical during each period. Going forward, we will market our services directly to building owners and managers. At times in the past, we have also done make ready projects that prepared buildings or offices to be ready for immediate occupancy after construction crews have completed their work. In these cases, we entered a project as soon as the construction crews finished their work and cleaned the facility completely to enable a tenant to move in and start work. However, the current economic climate has seen construction of new and renovation of old office facilities at extremely low levels meaning that there is currently an extremely low potential current demand for make ready services. We will not consider competing for these types of engagements until and unless the number of construction and renovation projects increases significantly. If the construction market improves, of which there can be no assurance, the Company will market its make ready services to construction contractors and subcontractors.
A summary of operations for the six months ended January 31, 2012 and 2011follows:
All of the revenues in both periods were earned from services to one customer. The work that is provided to this customer, which is not related to or affiliated with us, is performed under verbal agreements that could be terminated at any time. If we lost that customer for any reason, or if the amount of work that we perform for it decreases significantly, our operations are likely to fail.
Operating expenses relate to various professional fees. In August 2011, the Company issued 37,500,000 common shares registered in a Registration Statement on Form S-1 that was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 18, 2011 to settle consulting and professional fees expenses of $12,000. The expenses of $12,000 are included in the General and administrative expenses for the six-month period ended January 31, 2012. Substantially all other general and administrative costs relate to professional fees.
All compensation was paid to our President. Compensation includes the cost of her providing equipment and cleaning materials. There is no formal employment arrangement with Ms. Skarpa at this time. Ms. Skarpas compensation has not been fixed or based on any percentage calculations. All compensation has been paid in cash and was based on the amount of cash available to pay compensation after other expenses had been paid. She will make all decisions determining the amount and timing of her compensation and, for the immediate future, will receive the level of compensation each month that permits us to meet our obligations. Ms. Skarpas compensation amounts will be formalized if and when her annual compensation exceeds $150,000.
We have extremely limited financial resources and have not established a source of equity or debt financing. Our independent registered public accounting firm has included an explanatory paragraph in its report emphasizing the uncertainty of our ability to remain a going concern.
We have not aggressively pursued new customers during the past two years because the economic conditions were forcing companies to cut costs. In turn companies were seeking to reduce the costs of cleaning services. We were reluctant to increase costs of supplies and equipment in order to service customers that were only willing to pay minimal costs.
As a corporate policy,we will not incur any cash obligations that we cannot satisfy with known resources, of which there are currently none except as described in Liquidity below.
EBS will pay all costs relating to the offering that closed in August 2011. Those costs are estimated, based on discussions with our lawyer, at $65,000 and become due if and when we obtain a trading symbol. This amount will be paid as and when necessary and required or otherwise accrued on the books and records of EBS until we are able to pay the full amount due either from revenues or loans from our president. Absent sufficient revenues to pay these amounts within six months of the date of this prospectus, our president has agreed to sign a personal promissory note due and payable to counsel upon terms negotiated at the time of note issuance. The promissory note will eliminate unpaid liabilities on the Companys books equal to the face amount of the personal promissory note. Our outside counsel, who will be owed the most significant amount of fees, is aware of the uncertainties facing the Company and is also aware that we have no other immediate sources of sort or long-term funding that would be more likely to come through if needed. A formal written arrangement among EBS, our president and our counsel exists with respect to this purpose.
Private capital, if sought, will be sought from former business associates of our founder or private investors referred to us by those business associates. To date, we have not sought any funding source and have not authorized any person or entity to seek out funding on our behalf. If a market for our shares ever develops, of which there can be no assurances, we may attempt to use restricted shares of our common stock to compensate employees/consultants and independent contractors wherever possible. The prices that will be used will be determined during negotiations and may or may not be at perceived market values.
We believe that operations will generate sufficient cash to continue operations for the next 12 months from the date of this prospectus at the level that they have been provided that our costs of being a public company remain equal to or below the maximum estimate provided below and we do not lose our customer.
We have embarked upon an effort to become a public company and, by doing so, have incurred and will continue to incur additional significant expenses for legal, accounting and related services. Once we become a public entity, subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act of '34, we will incur ongoing expenses associated with professional fees for accounting, legal and a host of other expenses including annual reports and proxy statements, if required. We estimate, based on discussions with consultants, accountants and lawyers, that these costs may range up to $50,000 per year for the next few years. In the next one to two fiscal years, we will take every step possible to minimize these costs. Our president worked for many years with law firms and an accounting firm. She has known and worked with many professionals who are knowledgeable in the area of public company obligations. Although we have no formal commitments, we believe that some of these professionals may assist our president for very reasonable costs. We also hope to be able to use our status as a public company to increase our ability to use noncash means of settling obligations and compensate independent contractors who provide professional and other services to us, although there can be no assurances that we will be successful in any of those efforts. We will reduce the compensation levels paid to management if there is insufficient cash generated from operations to satisfy these costs.
There are no current plans to seek private investment. We do not have any current plans to raise funds through the sale of securities except as set forth herein. We hope to be able to use our status as a public company to enable us to use non-cash means of settling obligations and compensate persons and/or firms providing services to us, although there can be no assurances that we will be successful in any of those efforts. We believe that the perception that many people have of a public company make it more likely that they will accept restricted securities from a public company as consideration for indebtedness to them than they would from a private company. We have not performed any studies of this matter. Our conclusion is based on our own beliefs. Issuing shares of our common stock to such persons instead of paying cash to them may increase our chances to establish and expand our business. Having shares of our common stock may also give persons a greater feeling of identity with us which may result in referrals. However, these actions, if successful, will result in dilution of the ownership interests of existing shareholders, may further dilute common stock book value, and that dilution may be material. Such issuances may also serve to enhance existing managements ability to maintain control of EBS because the shares may be issued to parties or entities committed to supporting existing management. EBS may offer shares of its common stock to settle a portion of the professional fees incurred in connection with its registration statement. No negotiations have taken place with any professional and no assurances can be made as to the likelihood that any professional will accept shares in settlement of obligations due them. Our independent registered public accounting firm will not accept shares of EBS common stock to settle obligations due to them.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements and related notes requires us to make judgments, estimates, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the financial statements.
Financial Reporting Release No. 60 requires all companies to include a discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of financial statements. There are no critical policies or decisions that rely on judgments that are based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made. The financial statements include a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our financial statements.
We do not yet have a basis to determine whether our business will be seasonal.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K, obligations under any guarantee contracts or contingent obligations. We also have no other commitments, other than the costs of being a public company that will increase our operating costs or cash requirements in the future
Pursuant to Item 305(e) of Regulation S-K (§ 229.305(e)), the Company is not required to provide the information required by this Item as it is a smaller reporting company, as defined by Rule 229.10(f)(1).
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Managements Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Company's management and directors; and
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
As of January 31, 2012, our management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. In making this assessment, management followed an approach based on the framework set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (known as COSO). Based on this assessment, management determined that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective.
This quarterly report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's report in this quarterly report.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should be aware that there are various risks to an investment in our common stock. You should carefully consider these risk factors, together with all of the other information included in this Report, before you decide to invest in shares of our common stock.
If any of the following risks develop into actual events, then our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or prospects could be materially adversely affected. If that happens, the market price of our common stock, if any, could decline, and investors may lose all or part of their investment.
Risks Related to the Business
EBS has virtually no financial resources. Our independent registered auditors report includes an explanatory paragraph stating that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
EBS has virtually no financial resources.We have negative working capital and a stockholders deficit at January 31, 2012. Our independent registered auditors included an explanatory paragraph in their opinion on our financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2011 that states that this lack of resources causes substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. No assurances can be given that we will generate sufficient revenue or obtain necessary financing to continue as a going concern.
EBS is and will continue to be completely dependent on the services of our founder and president, Patricia G. Skarpa, the loss of whose services may cause our business operations to cease, and we will need to engage and retain qualified employees and consultants to further implement our strategy.
EBS operations and business strategy are completely dependent upon the knowledge and business connections of Ms. Skarpa. She is under no contractual obligation to remain employed by us. If she should choose to leave us for any reason or if she becomes ill and is unable to work for an extended period of time before we have hired additional personnel, our operations will likely fail. Even if we are able to find additional personnel, it is uncertain whether we could find someone who could develop our business along the lines described in this prospectus. We will fail without the services of Ms. Skarpa or an appropriate replacement(s).
We intend to acquire key-man life insurance on the life of Ms. Skarpa naming us as the beneficiary when and if we obtain the resources to do so and if she is insurable. We have not yet procured such insurance, and there is no guarantee that we will be able to obtain such insurance in the future. Accordingly, it is important that we are able to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified and talented personnel and independent contractors.
Most of our competitors, which include well-known companies like Jani-King International, Inc., have significantly greater financial and marketing resources than do we.
Most of our competitors, which include well-known companies like Jani-King International, Inc., have significantly greater financial and marketing resources than do we. Many of these competitors have sophisticated management, use very inexpensive sub-contractors, are in a position to purchase cleaning materials at the lowest wholesale prices and have the ability to advertise in a wide variety of media, including television. Their strategy frequently includes using very low priced sub-contractors and charging customers the lowest possible price. We principally depend on the business contacts of our president and word of mouth. We emphasize seeking office complexes that are being used by the building owner and that are seeking detailed quality services rather that solely consider low prices.
There are no assurances that our approach will be successful.
Substantially all of our revenues currently are derived from services to one unaffiliated customer. If that customer is lost, we would have no revenue and operations may cease.
One customer, which is not related to or affiliated with us, comprised 100% of our revenue in each of the fiscal periods ended January 31, 2012 and 2011. The work that is provided to this customer is performed under verbal agreements that could be terminated at any time. If we lost that customer, or if the amount of work that we perform for it decreases significantly, our operations are likely to fail.
We currently have no liability insurance.
We currently have no liability insurance. If damage is done to a customers facility during the course of our work or something is stolen from that facility and we are held liable, we may be unable to satisfy that liability which could result in the discontinuance of our business.
There are significant potential conflicts of interest which may result in key people devoting substantial portions of their time to other ventures.
Our key personnel are required to commit time to our affairs and, accordingly, these individual(s) (particularly our president) may have conflicts of interest in allocating time among various business activities. In the course of other business activities, certain key personnel (particularly our president) may become aware of business opportunities which may be appropriate for presentation to us, as well as the other entities with which they are affiliated. As such, there may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented.
We cannot provide assurances that our efforts to eliminate the potential impact of conflicts of interest will be effective.
We are subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act that will require us to incur audit fees and legal fees in connection with the preparation of such reports. These additional costs could reduce or eliminate our ability to earn a profit.
We are required to file periodic reports with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. In order to comply with these requirements, our independent registered public accounting firm will have to review our financial statements on a quarterly basis and audit our financial statements on an annual basis. Moreover, our legal counsel will have to review and assist in the preparation of such reports. The costs charged by these professionals for such services cannot be accurately predicted at this time because factors such as the number and type of transactions that we engage in and the complexity of our reports cannot be determined at this time and will have a major effect on the amount of time to be spent by our auditors and attorneys. However, the incurrence of such costs will obviously be an expense to our operations and thus have a negative effect on our ability to meet our overhead requirements and earn a profit. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and the trading price of our common stock, if a market ever develops, could drop significantly.
In no case will the proceeds of this offering be sufficient to assist us in any way to meet any portion of these incremental costs of being public.
Patricia G. Skarpa, our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and principal accounting officer has no significant experience managing a public company and no meaningful accounting or financial reporting education or experience and, accordingly, our ability to meet Exchange Act reporting requirements on a timely basis will be dependent to a significant degree upon others.
Patricia G. Skarpa has no significant experience managing a public company and no meaningful financial reporting education or experience. She is and will be heavily dependent on engaging and dealing with outside professional advisors, primarily lawyers and financial advisors/accountants who are and will not be affiliated with our independent auditors. We have no formal arrangements with professionals to help Ms. Skarpa and cannot provide any assurances that we will be able to establish arrangements with professionals on terms or costs that are acceptable or affordable to us.
Our internal controls may be inadequate, which could cause our financial reporting to be unreliable and lead to misinformation being disseminated to the public.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. As defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the principal executive and principal financial officer and effected by the board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and/or directors of the Company; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Our internal controls may be inadequate or ineffective, which could cause our financial reporting to be unreliable and lead to misinformation being disseminated to the public. Investors relying upon this misinformation may make an uninformed investment decision.
Having only two directors limits our ability to establish effective independent corporate governance procedures and increases the control of our president over operations and business decisions.
We have only two directors, one of whom is our principal executive officer. Accordingly, we cannot establish board committees comprised of independent members to oversee functions like compensation or audit issues. In addition, a tie vote of board members is decided in favor of the chairman, which gives her significant control over all corporate issues, including all major decisions on operations and corporate matters such as approving business combinations.
Until we have a larger board of directors that would include some independent members, if ever, there will be limited oversight of our presidents decisions and activities and little ability for minority shareholders to challenge or reverse those activities and decisions, even if they are not in the best interests of minority shareholders.
Ms. Patricia G. Skarpa, our president, has made all decisions concerning her compensation. These decisions may not be in the best interests of other investors.
There is no employment contract with Patricia G. Skarpa at this time. Nor are there any agreements for compensation in the future. Patricia G. Skarpas compensation has not been fixed or based on any percentage calculations. She has made all decisions determining the amount and timing of her compensation. She will continue making decisions about the timing and amount of her compensation until, if ever, we have a sufficient number of directors to establish a compensation committee of the board of directors. Patricia G. Skarpas decisions about her compensation may not be in the best interests of other shareholders.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Shareholders may be diluted significantly through our efforts to obtain financing and satisfy obligations through issuance of additional shares of our common stock.
We have no committed source of financing. Wherever possible, our board of directors will attempt to use non-cash consideration to satisfy obligations. In many instances, we believe that the non-cash consideration will consist of restricted shares of our common stock. Our board of directors has authority, without action or vote of the shareholders, to issue all or part of the authorized (500,000,000 shares) but unissued (140,625,000 shares). In addition, if a trading market develops for our common stock, we may attempt to raise capital by selling shares of our common stock, possibly at a discount to market. These actions will result in dilution of the ownership interests of existing shareholders may further dilute common stock book value, and that dilution may be material.
The interests of shareholders may be hurt because we can issue shares of our common stock to individuals or entities that support existing management with such issuances serving to enhance existing managements ability to maintain control of our Company.
Our president will own a significant majority of outstanding shares after the completion of the offering. In addition, our board of directors has authority, without action or vote of the shareholders, to issue all or part of the authorized but unissued common shares. Such issuances may be issued to parties or entities committed to supporting existing management and the interests of existing management which may not be the same as the interests of other shareholders. Although transactions, other than those described in this prospectus, are not currently being contemplated or discussed, our ability to issue shares without shareholder approval serves to enhance existing managements ability to maintain control of our Company or participate in other transactions, including entering into possible business combinations, without the support of other shareholders.
Our chief executive officer controls all corporate activities and can approve all transactions, including mergers, without the approval of other shareholders.
Our chief executive officer has a sufficient number of shares to control all corporate activities and can approve transactions, including possible mergers, issuance of shares and her compensation level, without the approval of other shareholders. Her decisions may not be in the best interests of other shareholders.
Our articles of incorporation provide for indemnification of officers and directors at our expense and limit their liability that may result in a major cost to us and hurt the interests of our shareholders because corporate resources may be expended for the benefit of officers and/or directors.
Our Articles of Incorporation at Article XI provide for indemnification as follows: "No director or officer of the Corporation shall be personally liable to the Corporation or any of its stockholders for damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer; provided, however, that the foregoing provision shall not eliminate or limit the liability of a director or officer: (i) for acts or omissions which involve intentional misconduct, fraud or knowing violation of law; or (ii) the payment of dividends in violation of Section 78.300 of the Nevada Revised Statutes. Any repeal or modification of an Article by the stockholders of the Corporation shall be prospective only, and shall not adversely affect any limitation of the personal liability of a director or officer of the Corporation for acts or omissions prior to such repeal or modification."
We have been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, indemnification for liabilities arising under federal securities laws is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification for liabilities arising under federal securities laws, other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding, is asserted by a director, officer or controlling person in connection with our activities, we will (unless in the opinion of our counsel, the matter has been settled by controlling precedent) submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction, the question whether indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. The legal process relating to this matter if it were to occur is likely to be very costly and may result in us receiving negative publicity, either of which factors is likely to materially reduce the market and price for our shares, if such a market ever develops.
Currently, there is no established public market for our securities, and there can be no assurances that any established public market will ever develop or that our common stock will be quoted for trading and, even if quoted, it is likely to be subject to significant price fluctuations.
We have been granted a trading symbol (EXBS). However, there is and there has never been any established trading market for our common stock. There is currently no established public market whatsoever for our securities.
Because of the anticipated low price of the securities being registered, many brokerage firms may not be willing to effect transactions in these securities. Purchasers of our securities should be aware that any market that develops in our stock will be subject to the penny stock restrictions.
Our shares may not become eligible to be traded electronically which would result in brokerage firms being unwilling to trade them.
We plan to try, through a broker-dealer and its clearing firm, to become eligible with the Depository Trust Company ("DTC") to permit our shares to trade electronically. If an issuer is not DTC-eligible, then its shares cannot be electronically transferred between brokerage accounts, which, based on the realities of the marketplace as it exists today (especially the OTCBB), means that shares of a company will not be traded (technically the shares can be traded manually between accounts, but this takes days and is not a realistic option for companies relying on broker dealers for stock transactions - like all companies on the OTCBB. What this boils down to is that while DTC-eligibility is not a requirement to trade on the OTCBB, it is a necessity to process trades on the OTCBB if a companys stock is going to trade with any volume. There are no assurances that our shares will ever become DTC-eligible or, if they do, how long it will take.
Any market that develops in shares of our common stock will be subject to the penny stock regulations and restrictions pertaining to low priced stocks that will create a lack of liquidity and make trading difficult or impossible.
Our shares will be considered a penny stock. Rule 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act establishes the definition of a "penny stock," for purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a minimum bid price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to a limited number of exceptions which are not available to us. This classification will severely and adversely affects any market liquidity for our common stock.
The market for penny stocks has experienced numerous frauds and abuses that could adversely impact investors in our stock.
Company management believes that the market for penny stocks has suffered from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include:
Control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer;
Manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases;
"Boiler room" practices involving high pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by sales persons;
Excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and markups by selling broker-dealers; and
Wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the inevitable collapse of those prices with consequent investor losses.
Any trading market that may develop may be restricted by virtue of state securities Blue Sky laws that prohibit trading absent compliance with individual state laws. These restrictions may make it difficult or impossible to sell shares in those states.
There is currently no established public market for our common stock, and there can be no assurance that any established public market will develop in the foreseeable future. Transfer of our common stock may also be restricted under the securities or securities regulations laws promulgated by various states and foreign jurisdictions, commonly referred to as Blue Sky laws. Absent compliance with such individual state laws, our common stock may not be traded in such jurisdictions. Because the securities registered hereunder have not been registered for resale under the blue sky laws of any state, the holders of such shares and persons who desire to purchase them in any trading market that might develop in the future, should be aware that there may be significant state blue sky law restrictions upon the ability of investors to sell the securities and of purchasers to purchase the securities. These restrictions prohibit the secondary trading of our common stock. We currently do not intend to and may not be able to qualify securities for resale in at least 17 states which do not offer manual exemptions (or may offer manual exemptions but may not to offer one to us if we are considered to be a shell company at the time of application) and require shares to be qualified before they can be resold by our shareholders. Accordingly, investors should consider the secondary market for our securities to be a limited one.
Our board of directors has the authority, without stockholder approval, to issue preferred stock with terms that may not be beneficial to common stockholders and with the ability to affect adversely stockholder voting power and perpetuate their control over us.
Our articles of incorporation allow us to issue shares of preferred stock without any vote or further action by our stockholders. Our board of directors has the authority to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of preferred stock. Our board of directors also has the authority to issue preferred stock without further stockholder approval, including large blocks of preferred stock. As a result, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock that would grant to holders the preferred right to our assets upon liquidation, the right to receive dividend payments before dividends are distributed to the holders of common stock and the right to the redemption of the shares, together with a premium, prior to the redemption of our common stock.
The ability of our president to control our business may limit or eliminate minority shareholders ability to influence corporate affairs.
Our president beneficially owns an aggregate of approximately 81.3% of our outstanding common stock. Because of her beneficial stock ownership, our president may be in a position to continue to elect our board of directors, decide all matters requiring stockholder approval, including potential mergers or business changes, and determine our policies. The interests of our president may differ from the interests of other shareholders with respect to the issuance of shares, business transactions with or sales to other companies, selection of officers and directors and other business decisions. The minority shareholders would have no way of overriding decisions made by our president. This level of control may also have an adverse impact on the market value of our shares because our president may institute or undertake transactions, policies or programs that may result in losses, may not take any steps to increase our visibility in the financial community and/or may sell sufficient numbers of shares to significantly decrease our price per share.
A significant portion of our presently issued and outstanding common shares are restricted under rule 144 of the Securities Act, as amended. When the restriction on any or all of these shares is lifted, and the shares are sold in the open market, the price of our common stock could be adversely affected.
A significant portion of the presently outstanding shares of common stock (321,875,000 shares) is considered "restricted securities" as defined under Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act and may only be sold pursuant to an effective registration statement or an exemption from registration, if available. Rule 144 provides in essence that a person who is not an affiliate and has held restricted securities for a prescribed period of at least six months if purchased from a reporting issuer or 12 months (as is the case herein) if purchased from a non-reporting Company, may, under certain conditions, sell all or any of his/her shares without volume limitation, in brokerage transactions. Affiliates, however, may not sell shares in excess of 1% of the Companys outstanding common stock each three months. As a result of revisions to Rule 144 which became effective on February 15, 2008, there is no limit on the amount of restricted securities that may be sold by a non-affiliate (i.e., a stockholder who has not been an officer, director or control person for at least 90 consecutive days) after the restricted securities have been held by the owner for the aforementioned prescribed period of time. A sale under Rule 144 or under any other exemption from the Act, if available, or pursuant to registration of shares of common stock of present stockholders, may have a depressive effect upon the price of the common stock in any market that may develop.
Of the total 359,375,000 shares outstanding, 321,875,000 of our common stock are owned by our president (312,500,000) and a director (9,375,000) and may be sold by them pursuant to the limitations of Rule 144.
We do not expect to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock. We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our common stock at any time in the foreseeable future. The future payment of dividends directly depends upon our future earnings, capital requirements, financial requirements and other factors that our board of directors will consider. Since we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock, return on your investment, if any, will depend solely on an increase, if any, in the market value of our common stock.
Because we are not subject to compliance with rules requiring the adoption of certain corporate governance measures, our stockholders have limited protection against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rule changes proposed and enacted by the SEC, the New York and American Stock Exchanges and the Nasdaq Stock Market, as a result of Sarbanes-Oxley, require the implementation of various measures relating to corporate governance. These measures are designed to enhance the integrity of corporate management and the securities markets and apply to securities that are listed on those exchanges or the Nasdaq Stock Market. Because we are not presently required to comply with many of the corporate governance provisions and because we chose to avoid incurring the substantial additional costs associated with such compliance any sooner than legally required, we have not yet adopted these measures.
Because none of our directors are independent directors, we do not currently have independent audit or compensation committees. As a result, these directors have the ability, among other things, to determine their own level of compensation. Until we comply with such corporate governance measures, regardless of whether such compliance is required, the absence of such standards of corporate governance may leave our stockholders without protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest, if any, and similar matters and investors may be reluctant to provide us with funds necessary to expand our operations.
We intend to comply with all corporate governance measures relating to director independence as and when required. However, we may find it very difficult or be unable to attract and retain qualified officers, directors and members of board committees required to provide for our effective management as a result of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has resulted in a series of rules and regulations by the SEC that increase responsibilities and liabilities of directors and executive officers. The perceived increased personal risk associated with these recent changes may make it more costly or deter qualified individuals from accepting these roles.
You may have limited access to information regarding our business because our obligations to file periodic reports with the SEC could be automatically suspended under certain circumstances.
As of effectiveness of our registration statement on August 18, 2011, we are required to file periodic reports with the SEC which will be immediately available to the public for inspection and copying. Except during the year that our registration statement becomes effective, these reporting obligations may (in our discretion) be automatically suspended under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act if we have less than 300 shareholders and do not file a registration statement on Form 8A (which we have no current plans to file). If this occurs after the year in which our registration statement becomes effective, we will no longer be obligated to file periodic reports with the SEC and your access to our business information would then be even more restricted. After this registration statement on Form S-1 becomes effective, we will be required to deliver periodic reports to security holders. However, we will not be required to furnish proxy statements to security holders and our directors, officers and principal beneficial owners will not be required to report their beneficial ownership of securities to the SEC pursuant to Section 16 of the Exchange Act until we have both 500 or more security holders and greater than $10 million in assets. This means that your access to information regarding our business will be limited.
For all of the foregoing reasons and others set forth herein, an investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
Item 5. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports of Form 8-K
31.1Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
32.1Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
March 13, 2012