 |
As filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2,
2012.
Registration
No. 333-174245
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Amendment No. 6
to
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Regional Management
Corp.
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in its Charter)
| |
|
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
6141
(Primary Standard
Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
57-0847115
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
509 West Butler Road
Greenville, South Carolina 29607
Telephone:
(864) 422-8011
(Address, including
zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of
Registrants principal executive offices)
Thomas F. Fortin
Chief Executive Officer
Regional Management Corp.
509 West Butler Road
Greenville, South Carolina 29607
Telephone:
(864) 422-8011
(Name, address,
including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,
of agent for service)
Copies to:
| |
|
|
Joshua Ford Bonnie
Lesley Peng
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
425 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017
Telephone:
(212) 455-2000
Facsimile:
(212) 455-2502
|
|
Colin J. Diamond
White & Case LLP
1155 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Telephone: (212) 819-8200
Facsimile: (212) 354-8113
|
Approximate date of commencement of the proposed sale of the
securities to the public: As soon as practicable after the
Registration Statement is declared effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box. o
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check
the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
| Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
CALCULATION OF
REGISTRATION FEE
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSED MAXIMUM
|
|
|
|
TITLE OF EACH CLASS OF
|
|
|
AGGREGATE OFFERING
|
|
|
AMOUNT OF
|
|
SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED
|
|
|
PRICE(1)(2)
|
|
|
REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share
|
|
|
$100,000,000
|
|
|
$11,460(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of
determining the amount of the registration fee in accordance
with Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933.
|
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information contained in this preliminary prospectus is not
complete and may be changed. We and the selling stockholders may
not sell these securities until the registration statement filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This
preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities
and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any
jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO
COMPLETION, DATED MARCH 2, 2012
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS
Shares
Common Stock
We are
offering shares
of our common stock and the selling stockholders identified in
this prospectus are
offering shares
of our common stock. We will not receive any proceeds from the
sale of shares by the selling stockholders. This is our initial
public offering and no public market currently exists for our
common stock. We expect the initial public offering price to be
between $ and
$ per share. Our common stock has
been approved for listing on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol RM.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
Please read Risk Factors beginning on page 12
of this prospectus.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PER SHARE
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
|
Public Offering Price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Underwriting Discounts and Commissions
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Proceeds to Regional Management Corp. before expenses
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Proceeds to the selling stockholders before expenses
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Delivery of the shares of common stock is expected to be made on
or
about
, 2012. The selling stockholders have granted the underwriters
an option for a period of 30 days to purchase an
additional shares
of our common stock solely to cover over-allotments. If the
underwriters exercise the option in full, the total underwriting
discounts and commissions payable by the selling stockholders
will be $ , and the total proceeds
to the selling stockholders, before expenses, will be
$ .
| |
|
|
|
Jefferies
JMP Securities
|
|
Stephens Inc.
BMO Capital Markets
|
Prospectus
dated ,
2012
Table of
Contents
We are responsible for the information contained in this
prospectus and in any free writing prospectus we may authorize
to be delivered to you. Neither we nor any of the selling
stockholders have authorized anyone to provide you with
additional or different information. We and the underwriters are
offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, shares of our
common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are
permitted. The information in this prospectus is accurate only
as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of
delivery of this prospectus or any sale of shares of our common
stock. This prospectus is not an offer to sell or solicitation
of an offer to buy these shares of common stock in any
circumstances under which the offer or solicitation is unlawful.
Unless the context suggests otherwise, references in this
prospectus to Regional, the Company,
we, us and our refer to
Regional Management Corp. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
In this prospectus, we refer to Palladium Equity Partners III,
L.P. and Parallel 2005 Equity Fund, LP, our current majority
owners, as the sponsors, and we refer to the other
owners of Regional Management Corp. as the individual
owners. We refer the sponsors together with the individual
owners as our existing owners. Palladium Equity
Partners III, L.P. is an affiliate of Palladium Equity Partners,
LLC, which we refer to, together with its affiliates, as
Palladium, and Parallel 2005 Equity Fund, LP is an
affiliate of Parallel Investment Partners, LLC, which we refer
to, together with its affiliates, as Parallel.
i
In this prospectus, references to loans (and
corresponding references to lending and
lender) include both direct loans and indirect
loans. Direct loans are loans that are closed and funded
directly by the financing provider. Indirect loans are closed
and funded by a third party, such as an automobile dealer or a
retailer, and subsequently purchased by the financing provider.
This prospectus includes market and industry data and forecasts
that we have derived from publicly available information,
various industry publications, other published industry sources
and our internal data and estimates. Our internal data and
estimates are based upon information obtained from trade and
business organizations and other contacts in the markets in
which we operate and our managements understanding of
industry conditions.
Unless indicated otherwise, the information included in this
prospectus (1) assumes no exercise by the underwriters of
the over-allotment option to purchase up to an
additional shares
of common stock from the selling stockholders and
(2) assumes that the shares of common stock to be sold in
this offering are sold at $ per
share of common stock, which is the midpoint of the price range
indicated on the front cover of this prospectus.
Through and
including ,
2012 (the 25th day after the date of this prospectus), all
dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or
not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This requirement is in addition to the dealers
obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters
and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
ii
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information contained
elsewhere in this prospectus and does not contain all the
information you should consider before investing in shares of
our common stock. You should read this entire prospectus
carefully, including the section entitled Risk
Factors and the financial statements and the related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus, before you decide to
invest in shares of our common stock.
Regional
Management Corp.
We are a diversified specialty consumer finance company
providing a broad array of loan products primarily to customers
with limited access to consumer credit from banks, thrifts,
credit card companies and other traditional lenders. We began
operations in 1987 with four branches in South Carolina and have
expanded our branch network to 170 locations with over 174,000
active accounts across South Carolina, Texas, North Carolina,
Tennessee, Alabama and Oklahoma as of December 31, 2011.
Each of our loan products is secured, structured on a fixed
rate, fixed term basis with fully amortizing equal monthly
installment payments and is repayable at any time without
penalty. Our loans are sourced through our multiple channel
platform, including in our branches, through direct mail
campaigns, independent and franchise automobile dealerships,
online credit application networks, furniture and appliance
retailers and our consumer website. We operate an integrated
branch model in which all loans, regardless of origination
channel, are serviced and collected through our branch network,
providing us with frequent in-person contact with our customers,
which we believe improves our credit performance and customer
loyalty. Our goal is to consistently and soundly grow our
finance receivables and manage our portfolio risk while
providing our customers with attractive and
easy-to-understand
loan products that serve their varied financial needs.
Our diversified product offerings include:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Small Installment Loans We offer standardized
small installment loans ranging from $300 to $2,500, with terms
of up to 36 months, which are secured by non-essential
household goods. We originate these loans both through our
branches and through mailing live checks to
pre-screened individuals who are able to enter into a loan by
depositing these checks. As of December 31, 2011, we had
approximately 137,000 small installment loans outstanding
representing $130.3 million in finance receivables.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Large Installment Loans We offer large
installment loans through our branches ranging from $2,500 to
$20,000, with terms of between 18 and 60 months, which are
secured by a vehicle in addition to non-essential household
goods. As of December 31, 2011, we had approximately 12,000
large installment loans outstanding representing
$36.9 million in finance receivables.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Automobile Purchase Loans We offer automobile
purchase loans of up to $30,000, generally with terms of between
36 and 72 months, which are secured by the purchased
vehicle. Our automobile purchase loans are offered through a
network of dealers in our geographic footprint, including over
2,000 independent and approximately 740 franchise automobile
dealerships as of December 31, 2011. Our automobile
purchase loans include both direct loans, which are sourced
through a dealership and closed at one of our branches, and
indirect loans, which are originated and closed at a dealership
in our network without the need for the customer to visit one of
our branches. As of December 31, 2011, we had approximately
15,000 automobile purchase loans outstanding representing
$128.7 million in finance receivables.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Furniture and Appliance Purchase Loans We
offer indirect furniture and appliance purchase loans of up to
$7,500, with terms of between six and 48 months, which are
secured by the purchased furniture or appliance. These loans are
offered through a network of approximately 250 furniture and
appliance retailers. Since launching this product in November
2009, our portfolio has grown to approximately 9,200 furniture
and appliance purchase loans outstanding representing
$10.7 million in finance receivables at December 31,
2011.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Insurance Products We offer our customers
optional payment protection insurance relating to many of our
loan products.
|
Our revenue has grown from $56.6 million in 2007 to
$105.2 million in 2011, representing a compound annual
growth rate (CAGR) of 16.8%. Our net income from
continuing operations has grown even more rapidly from
$3.1 million in 2007 to $21.2 million in 2011,
representing a CAGR of 61.7%. On a pro forma basis, giving
effect to this offering and the application of the estimated net
proceeds therefrom as described under Use of
Proceeds, our net income would have been
$ million in 2011. Our
aggregate finance receivables have grown from
1
$167.5 million as of December 31, 2007 to
$306.6 million as of December 31, 2011, representing a
CAGR of 16.3%.
Our
Industry
We operate in the consumer finance industry serving the large
and growing population of underbanked and other non-prime
consumers who have limited access to credit from banks, thrifts,
credit card companies and other traditional lenders. According
to the FDIC, there were approximately 43 million adults
living in underbanked households in the United States in
2009. Furthermore, difficult economic conditions in recent years
have resulted in an increase in the number of non-prime
consumers in the United States. While the number of non-prime
consumers in the United States has grown, the supply of consumer
credit to this demographic has contracted since deregulation of
the U.S. banking industry in the 1980s. Tightened credit
requirements that began during the recession in 2008 and 2009
further reduced the supply of consumer credit. According to the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, $1.4 trillion in consumer
credit, including mortgages, home equity lines of credit, auto
loans, credit cards and other forms of consumer credit, was
removed from the credit markets between the second half of 2008
and the fourth quarter of 2011. We believe the large and growing
number of potential customers in our target market, combined
with the decline in available consumer credit, provides an
attractive market opportunity for our diversified product
offerings.
Installment Lending. Installment lending to
underbanked and other non-prime consumers is one of the most
highly fragmented sectors of the consumer finance industry. We
believe that installment loans are provided through
approximately 8,000 to 10,000 individually-licensed finance
company branches in the United States. Providers of installment
loans, such as Regional, generally offer loans with longer terms
and lower interest rates than other alternatives available to
underbanked consumers, such as title, payday and pawn lenders
(alternative financial services providers).
Automobile Purchase Lending. Automobile
finance comprises one of the largest consumer finance markets in
the United States. According to CNW Research, originations by
borrowers within the subprime market averaged $81.4 billion
annually over the past ten years. In recent years, many
providers of automobile financing have substantially curtailed
their lending to subprime borrowers and as a result, subprime
automobile purchase loan approval rates have dropped
significantly from approximately 69% in early 2007 to
approximately 11% at the end of 2011. This contraction in the
supply of financing presents an attractive opportunity to
provide a large, underserved population of borrowers with
automobile purchase financing.
Furniture and Appliance Purchase Lending. The
furniture and appliance industry represents a large consumer
market with limited financing options for non-prime consumers.
According to the U.S. Department of Commerces Bureau
of Economic Analysis, personal consumption expenditures for
household furniture were estimated at approximately
$83.9 billion for 2011. Most furniture retailers do not
provide their own financing, but instead partner with large
banks and credit card companies who generally limit their
lending activities to prime borrowers. As a result, non-prime
customers often do not qualify for financing from these
traditional lenders. Continued demand for furniture and
appliances, combined with constraints on the availability of
credit for non-prime consumers, presents a growth opportunity
for furniture and appliance purchase loans.
Our
Strengths
Integrated Branch Model Offers Advantages Over Traditional
Lenders. Our branch network, with 170 locations
across six states as of December 31, 2011, serves as the
foundation of our multiple channel platform and the primary
point of contact with our over 174,000 active accounts. All
loans, regardless of origination channel, are serviced and
collected through our branches, which allows us to maintain
frequent, in-person contact with our customers, which we believe
improves our credit performance and customer loyalty.
Additionally, with over 70% of monthly payments made in-person
at our branches, we have frequent opportunities to assess the
borrowing needs of our customers and offer new loan products as
their credit profiles evolve.
Multiple Channel Platform. We offer a
diversified range of loan products through our multiple channel
platform, which included, as of December 31, 2011:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
170 branches across six states;
|
2
|
|
|
| |
n
|
a network of over 2,000 independent and approximately 740
franchise auto dealerships, which offer our loans to their
customers;
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
our pre-screened live check mailings;
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
a network of approximately 250 furniture and appliance
retailers, which offer our loans to their customers; and
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
our consumer website through which we facilitate loan
applications.
|
We believe that our multiple channel platform provides us with a
competitive advantage by giving us broader access to our
customers and multiple avenues for attracting new customers,
enabling us to grow our finance receivables, revenues and
earnings.
Attractive Products for Customers with Limited Access to
Credit. Our flexible loan products, ranging from
$300 to $30,000 with terms between three and 72 months,
incorporate features designed to meet the varied financial needs
and credit profiles of a broad array of consumers. We believe
that the rates on our products are significantly more attractive
than many other available credit options, such as payday, pawn
or title loans. We also differentiate ourselves from such
alternative financial service providers by reporting our
customers payment performance to credit bureaus, providing
our customers the opportunity to improve their credit score and
ultimately gain access to a wider range of credit options,
including our own.
Demonstrated Organic Growth. Since
December 31, 2007, we have grown our finance receivables by
83.0% from $167.5 million to $306.6 million at
December 31, 2011 by expanding our branch network and
developing new channels and products. From 2007 to 2011, we grew
our year-end
branch count from 96 branches to 170 branches, a CAGR of 15.4%,
with an average annual same-store revenue growth rate of 14.7%
during the same period. Historically, our branches have rapidly
increased their outstanding finance receivables during the early
years of operations and generally have quickly achieved
profitability. We introduced direct automobile purchase loans in
1998, and have recently expanded our product offerings to
include indirect automobile purchase loans. We opened two
AutoCredit Source branches in early 2011 and two additional
AutoCredit Source branches in early 2012, which focus solely on
originating, underwriting and servicing indirect automobile
purchase loans. As of December 31, 2011, we had established
over 480 indirect dealer relationships through our AutoCredit
Source branches. Gross loan originations from our live check
program have grown from $52.5 million in 2008 to
$143.1 million in 2011, a CAGR of 39.7%.
Consistent Portfolio Performance. Through
over 24 years of experience in the consumer finance
industry, we have established conservative and sound
underwriting and lending practices. Our sound underwriting
standards focus on our customers ability to affordably
make payments out of their discretionary income with the value
of pledged collateral serving as a credit enhancement rather
than the primary underwriting criterion. Portfolio performance
is improved by our regular in-person contact with customers at
our branches which helps us to anticipate repayment problems
before they occur and allows us to proactively work with
customers to develop solutions prior to default, using
repossession only as a last option. Despite the challenges posed
by the sharp economic downturn beginning in 2008, our annual net
charge-offs since January 1, 2007 have remained consistent,
ranging from 6.3% to 8.6% of our average finance receivables. In
2011, our net charge-offs as a percentage of average finance
receivables were 6.3%. Our loan loss provision as a percentage
of total revenue for 2011 was 17.0%. We believe that our
consistent portfolio performance demonstrates the resiliency of
our business model throughout economic cycles.
Experienced Management Team. Our executive
and senior operations management teams consist of individuals
highly experienced in installment lending and other consumer
finance services. We believe our executive management
teams experience has allowed us to consistently grow our
business while delivering high-quality service to our customers
and carefully managing our credit risk. The 21 members of our
field management team average more than 24 years of
industry experience.
Our
Strategies
Grow Our Branch Network. We intend to
continue growing the revenue and profitability of our branch
network by increasing volume at our existing branches, opening
new branches within our existing geographic footprint and
expanding our operations into new states.
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Existing Branches We intend to continue
increasing same-store revenues, which have grown an average of
|
3
|
|
|
| |
|
14.7% per annum for the five years ended December 31,
2011, by further building relationships in the communities in
which we operate and capitalizing on opportunities to offer our
customers new loan products as their credit profiles evolve.
From 2007 to 2011, we opened 74 new branches, and we expect
revenues at these branches will continue to grow faster than our
overall same-store revenue growth rate as these branches mature.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
New Branches We believe there is sufficient
demand for consumer finance services to continue our pattern of
new branch growth and branch acquisitions in the states where we
currently operate, allowing us to capitalize on our existing
infrastructure and experience in these markets. Opening new
branches allows us to generate both direct lending at the
branches, as well as to create new origination opportunities by
establishing relationships through the branches with automobile
dealerships and furniture and appliance retailers in the
community.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
New States We intend to explore opportunities
for growth in several states outside our existing geographic
footprint that enjoy favorable interest rate and regulatory
environments. In December 2011, we opened our first branch in
Oklahoma. In February 2012, we leased a location for a branch in
New Mexico, and we are applying for a license to operate in New
Mexico.
|
Continue to Expand and Capitalize on Our Diverse Channels
and Products. We intend to continue to reach
new customers and offer our existing customers new loan products
by expanding and capitalizing on our multiple channel platform
and broad array of offerings as follows:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Automobile Purchase Loans We have identified
over 11,000 additional dealers in our existing geographic
footprint. We have hired dedicated marketing personnel to
develop relationships with these additional dealers to expand
our network. We will also seek to capture a larger percentage of
the financing activity of dealers in our existing network. We
intend to continue expanding the number of franchise dealer
relationships through our AutoCredit Source branches to grow our
loan portfolio through increased penetration, and in
January 2012, we opened two new AutoCredit Source branches
in Texas.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Live Check Program We continue to refine our
screening criteria and tracking for direct mail campaigns, which
we believe has enabled us to improve response rates and credit
performance and allowed us to triple the annual number of live
checks that we mailed from 2007 to 2011. We intend to continue
to increase our use of live checks to grow our loan portfolio by
adding new customers and creating opportunities to offer new
loan products to our existing customers.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Furniture and Appliance Purchase Loans We
have identified over 3,400 additional furniture and appliance
retail locations in our existing geographic footprint which
offers us the opportunity to expand our network.
|
| |
| |
n
|
Online Sourcing We intend to continue to
develop and expand our online marketing efforts and increase
traffic to our consumer website through the use of tools such as
search engine optimization and paid online advertising.
|
Continue to Focus on Sound Underwriting and Credit
Control. We intend to continue to leverage
our core competencies in sound underwriting and credit
management developed through over 24 years of lending
experience as we seek to profitably grow our share of the
consumer finance market. In recent years, we have implemented
several new programs to continue improving our underwriting
standards and loan collection rates, including our branch
scorecard program that systematically monitors a
range of operating, credit quality and performance metrics. We
believe the central oversight provided by our management
information system and the scorecard program, combined with our
branch-level servicing and collections, improves credit
performance. We plan to continue to develop strategies to
further improve our sound underwriting standards and loan
collection rates as we expand.
Recent
Developments
Acquisition of Alabama Branches. On
January 20, 2012, we purchased approximately
$28 million of consumer loan assets and 23 branches in
Alabama. We expect to consolidate four of these branches into
our existing locations, resulting in a net gain of 19 branches,
which will bring our total number of branches in Alabama to 33
and provides us with locations in many attractive markets in
central and Northern Alabama. The loans we acquired are similar
to the loans that we originate in maturity and loan size and
will be primarily classified as large installment loans in our
financial statements. The loans that we acquired bear interest
at rates that are reasonably comparable to the large installment
loans we originate. We plan to expand the products offered
through these branches to include our full range of loans,
including our automobile purchase loans and furniture and
appliance purchase loans.
Senior Revolving Credit Facility. On
January 18, 2012, we amended our Third Amended and Restated
Loan and Security Agreement dated as of March 21, 2007 (the
senior revolving credit facility) to increase our
borrowing availability by $30 million and extend its
maturity to January 2015. Upon the completion of this offering,
the
4
interest rate will be reduced from one-month LIBOR (with a
LIBOR floor of 1.00%) plus 3.25% to one-month LIBOR (with a
LIBOR floor of 1.00%) plus 3.00%. Aggregate borrowing
availability under the senior revolving credit facility now
totals $255 million.
Risk
Factors
An investment in shares of our common stock involves substantial
risks and uncertainties that may adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations and cash flows
that you should consider before you decide to participate in
this offering. Some of the more significant risks relating to an
investment in our company include the following:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
We have grown significantly in recent years and our delinquency
and charge-off rates and overall results of operations may be
adversely affected if we do not manage our growth effectively;
|
| |
| |
n
|
We face significant risks in implementing our growth strategy
some of which are outside our control;
|
| |
| |
n
|
We face strong direct and indirect competition;
|
| |
| |
n
|
Our business products and activities are strictly and
comprehensively regulated at the local, state and federal level;
|
| |
| |
n
|
Changes in laws and regulations or interpretations of laws and
regulations could negatively impact our business, results of
operations and financial condition;
|
| |
| |
n
|
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of
2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act) authorizes the newly
created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the
CFPB) to adopt rules that could potentially have a
serious impact on our ability to offer short-term consumer loans
and have a material adverse effect on our operations and
financial performance;
|
| |
| |
n
|
A substantial majority of our revenue is generated by our
branches in South Carolina, Texas and North Carolina;
|
| |
| |
n
|
Our business could suffer if we are unsuccessful in making,
continuing and growing relationships with automobile dealers and
furniture and appliance retailers;
|
| |
| |
n
|
Regular turnover among our managers and other employees at our
branches makes it more difficult for us to operate our branches
and increases our costs of operations, which could have an
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition;
|
| |
| |
n
|
Our live check direct mail strategy exposes us to certain risks;
and
|
| |
| |
n
|
We face credit risk in our lending activities.
|
Please see Risk Factors for a discussion of these
and other factors you should consider before making an
investment in shares of our common stock.
Our
Sponsors
On March 21, 2007, the majority of our outstanding common
stock was acquired by Palladium Equity Partners III, L.P. and
Parallel 2005 Equity Fund, LP, which we refer to as the
acquisition transaction. Palladium is a middle
market private equity firm with over $1 billion of assets
under management focused primarily on growth buyout investments.
Palladium principals have been actively involved in the
investment of $1.5 billion of capital in approximately 50
portfolio companies since 1989 and have significant experience
in financial services, business services, food, restaurants,
healthcare, industrial and media businesses, including ABRA Auto
Body & Glass, American Gilsonite Holding Company, Capital
Contractors, Inc., Castro Cheese Holding Company, Jordan Health
Services, Money Transfer Holdings, L.P., Taco Bueno Restaurants
and Teasdale Quality Foods. Palladium was founded in 1997 and is
headquartered in New York City. Parallel is a sector-focused,
lower-middle market private equity firm that invests in
entrepreneurial companies in North America. Since 1992, the
principals of the firm have participated in investing over
$600 million in over 35 companies, including Dollar
Tree, Inc. (NASDAQ: DLTR), Hibbett Sports Inc. (NASDAQ: HIBB),
Hat World, Inc. and Teavana Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: TEA). Founded
in 1999 as an affiliate of middle market buyout firm Saunders
Karp & Megrue, Parallel is headquartered in Dallas,
Texas.
5
Regional Management Corp. was incorporated in South Carolina on
March 25, 1987 and converted into a Delaware corporation on
August 23, 2011. Our principal executive offices are
located at 509 West Butler Road, Greenville, South Carolina
29607 and our telephone number is
(864) 422-8011.
Our consumer website is located at www.GetRegionalCash.com.
Information on or accessible through our website is not part of
or incorporated by reference in this prospectus.
Throughout this prospectus, we refer to various trademarks,
service marks and trade names that we use in our business. Other
trademarks and service marks appearing in this prospectus are
the property of their respective holders.
6
THE
OFFERING
|
|
|
|
Common stock offered by us
|
|
shares. |
|
|
|
|
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders
|
|
shares
( shares
if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in
full). |
|
|
|
|
Over-allotment option
|
|
The selling stockholders have granted the underwriters a
30-day
option to purchase up
to additional
shares of our common stock at the initial public offering price,
solely to cover over-allotments, if any. |
|
|
|
|
Common stock outstanding after this offering
|
|
shares. |
|
|
|
|
Use of proceeds
|
|
We estimate that the net proceeds to us from this offering,
after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering
expenses payable by us, will be approximately
$ million. We intend to use
the net proceeds of this offering and cash on hand as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
n to
repay $ million of
outstanding borrowings, plus accrued and unpaid interest, under
the senior revolving credit facility;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
n to
repay $25.8 million outstanding as of December 31,
2011, plus accrued and unpaid interest, under our Senior
Subordinated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of
August 25, 2010 (the mezzanine debt), which is
held by certain of our existing owners; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
n $1.1 million
to make one-time payments to certain of our existing owners in
the aggregate in consideration for the termination of our
advisory and consulting agreements with them in accordance with
their terms upon consummation of this offering as described
under Certain Relationships and Related Person
Transactions Advisory and Consulting Fees.
|
| |
|
|
|
Any additional net proceeds will be applied to repay additional
outstanding borrowings under our senior revolving credit
facility. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of
shares of our common stock by the selling stockholders. See
Use of Proceeds. |
| |
|
Dividend policy
|
|
We have no current plans to pay dividends on our common stock in
the foreseeable future. |
| |
|
Risk factors
|
|
See Risk Factors for a discussion of risks you
should carefully consider before deciding to invest in our
common stock. |
| |
|
New York Stock Exchange symbol
|
|
RM |
| |
|
Conflict of interest
|
|
We intend to use a portion of the net proceeds from this
offering to repay amounts outstanding under our senior revolving
credit facility. An affiliate of BMO Capital Markets Corp., an
underwriter in this offering, is one of the lenders under our
senior revolving credit facility. Because more than 5% of the
proceeds of this offering, not including underwriting
compensation, may be received by an affiliate of an underwriter
in this offering depending on the final offering price |
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
per share, this offering is being conducted in compliance with
FINRA Rule 5121, as administered by the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority, Inc. However, no qualified independent
underwriter is needed for this offering because this offering
meets the conditions set forth in FINRA Rule 5121(a)(1)(A).
See Use of Proceeds and Underwriting
(Conflicts of Interest) Affiliations and Conflicts
of Interest. |
The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding
following this offering is based on 9,336,727 shares of our
common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2011. In this
prospectus, unless otherwise indicated, the number of shares of
common stock outstanding and the other information based thereon
does not reflect:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
589,622 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise
of options at a weighted average exercise price of $5.4623 per
share outstanding as of December 31, 2011 under the
Regional Management Corp. 2007 Management Incentive Plan (our
2007 Stock Plan) including options granted in 2007
and 2008; and
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
950,000 shares of common stock that have been reserved for
issuance under the Regional Management Corp. 2011 Stock
Incentive Plan (our 2011 Stock Plan) including
280,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options
that we intend to grant to our executive officers and directors
and 30,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock
options that we intend to grant to our other employees, each at
the time of this offering with an exercise price equal to the
initial public offering price. See Management
Compensation Discussion and Analysis 2011 Stock
Incentive Plan and Actions Taken in 2012
and Anticipated Actions in Connection with the Offering.
|
8
SUMMARY
HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING
DATA
The following table sets forth our summary historical and pro
forma consolidated financial and operating data as of the dates
and for the periods indicated, and should be read together with
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial
Information, Selected Historical Consolidated
Financial and Operating Data, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and the historical financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
We derived the summary historical consolidated statement of
income data for each of the years ended December 31, 2009,
2010 and 2011 and the summary historical consolidated balance
sheet data as of December 31, 2010 and 2011 from our
audited consolidated financial statements, which are included
elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the summary
historical consolidated statement of income data for each of the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 and the summary
historical consolidated balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 from our audited financial
statements, which are not included in this prospectus.
The summary unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of income
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 presents our
consolidated results of operations giving pro forma effect to
this offering and the application of the estimated net proceeds
therefrom as described under Use of Proceeds,
including a reduction in the interest rate under our senior
revolving credit facility, which will take effect upon the
completion of this offering, as if such transactions occurred on
January 1, 2011. The summary unaudited pro forma
consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2011
presents our consolidated financial position giving pro forma
effect to this offering and the application of the estimated net
proceeds therefrom as described under Use of
Proceeds, as if such transaction occurred on
December 31, 2011. The pro forma adjustments are based on
available information and upon assumptions that our management
believes are reasonable in order to reflect, on a pro forma
basis, the impact of these transactions on our historical
financial information. The summary unaudited pro forma
consolidated financial information is included for informational
purposes only and does not purport to reflect our results of
operations or financial position that would have occurred had we
operated as a public company during the periods presented. The
unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information should
not be relied upon as being indicative of our results of
operations or financial position had this offering and the
application of the estimated net proceeds therefrom as
9
described under Use of Proceeds, occurred on the
dates assumed. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
information also does not project our results of operations or
financial position for any future period or date.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FORMA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YEAR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ENDED
|
|
|
|
|
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fee income
|
|
$
|
49,478
|
|
|
$
|
58,471
|
|
|
$
|
63,590
|
|
|
$
|
74,218
|
|
|
$
|
91,286
|
|
|
$
|
91,286
|
|
|
Insurance income, net, and other income
|
|
|
7,144
|
|
|
|
8,271
|
|
|
|
9,224
|
|
|
|
12,614
|
|
|
|
13,933
|
|
|
|
13,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
56,622
|
|
|
|
66,742
|
|
|
|
72,814
|
|
|
|
86,832
|
|
|
|
105,219
|
|
|
|
105,219
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan
losses(2)
|
|
|
13,665
|
|
|
|
17,376
|
|
|
|
19,405
|
|
|
|
16,568
|
|
|
|
17,854
|
|
|
|
17,854
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
22,950
|
|
|
|
27,862
|
|
|
|
29,120
|
|
|
|
33,525
|
|
|
|
40,634
|
|
|
|
40,634
|
|
|
Consulting and advisory fees
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
|
1,644
|
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior and other debt
|
|
|
8,687
|
|
|
|
7,399
|
|
|
|
4,846
|
|
|
|
5,542
|
|
|
|
8,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mezzanine debt
|
|
|
5,353
|
|
|
|
3,706
|
|
|
|
3,835
|
|
|
|
4,342
|
|
|
|
4,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
14,040
|
|
|
|
11,105
|
|
|
|
8,681
|
|
|
|
9,884
|
|
|
|
12,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
52,661
|
|
|
|
57,987
|
|
|
|
58,469
|
|
|
|
61,210
|
|
|
|
71,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes and discontinued operations
|
|
|
3,961
|
|
|
|
8,755
|
|
|
|
14,345
|
|
|
|
25,622
|
|
|
|
33,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
857
|
|
|
|
2,276
|
|
|
|
4,472
|
|
|
|
9,178
|
|
|
|
12,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
3,104
|
|
|
$
|
6,479
|
|
|
$
|
9,873
|
|
|
$
|
16,444
|
|
|
$
|
21,244
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per
share(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
|
$
|
2.28
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per
share(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing basic earnings per
share(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,336,727
|
|
|
|
9,336,727
|
|
|
|
9,336,727
|
|
|
|
9,336,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing diluted earnings per
share(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,482,604
|
|
|
|
9,590,564
|
|
|
|
9,669,618
|
|
|
|
9,620,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance
receivables(4)
|
|
$
|
167,535
|
|
|
$
|
192,289
|
|
|
$
|
214,909
|
|
|
$
|
247,246
|
|
|
$
|
306,594
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan
losses(2)
|
|
|
(13,290
|
)
|
|
|
(15,665
|
)
|
|
|
(18,441
|
)
|
|
|
(18,000
|
)
|
|
|
(19,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net finance
receivables(5)
|
|
$
|
154,245
|
|
|
$
|
176,624
|
|
|
$
|
196,468
|
|
|
$
|
229,246
|
|
|
$
|
287,294
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
168,484
|
|
|
|
192,502
|
|
|
|
214,447
|
|
|
|
241,358
|
|
|
|
304,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
159,079
|
|
|
|
176,095
|
|
|
|
187,807
|
|
|
|
197,914
|
|
|
|
239,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary
equity(6)
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
(2,595
|
)
|
|
|
4,407
|
|
|
|
14,640
|
|
|
|
31,444
|
|
|
|
52,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
Selected Operational Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average finance
receivables(7)
|
|
$
|
146,265
|
|
|
$
|
178,159
|
|
|
$
|
192,981
|
|
|
$
|
216,022
|
|
|
$
|
264,012
|
|
|
|
|
Number of branches (at period end)
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from operations
|
|
$
|
17,990
|
|
|
$
|
26,654
|
|
|
$
|
31,232
|
|
|
$
|
41,215
|
|
|
$
|
41,048
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency
ratio(8)
|
|
|
40.5
|
%
|
|
|
41.7
|
%
|
|
|
40.0
|
%
|
|
|
38.6
|
%
|
|
|
38.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
Same-store finance receivables (at period
end)(9)
|
|
$
|
163,945
|
|
|
$
|
184,087
|
|
|
$
|
212,804
|
|
|
$
|
236,717
|
|
|
$
|
272,602
|
|
|
|
|
Same-store revenue growth
rate(9)
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
Same-store finance receivables growth
rate(9)
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
Selected Asset Quality Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of loans (at period end)
|
|
|
99,089
|
|
|
|
110,895
|
|
|
|
128,285
|
|
|
|
148,813
|
|
|
|
174,482
|
|
|
|
|
Loan loss provision as a percentage of revenue
|
|
|
24.1
|
%
|
|
|
26.0
|
%
|
|
|
26.7
|
%
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Loan loss provision as a percentage of average finance
receivables
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average finance receivables
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
Over 90 days contractual delinquency rate
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
Over 180 days contractual delinquency rate
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On March 21, 2007, Palladium
Equity Partners III, L.P. and Parallel 2005 Equity Fund, LP
acquired the majority of our outstanding common stock. In
connection with the acquisition transaction, we issued
$25.0 million of mezzanine debt at an interest rate of
18.375%, plus related fees, which we refinanced in 2007 and
again in 2010 with Palladium Equity Partners III, L.P. and
certain of our individual owners. Additionally, we pay the
sponsors annual advisory fees of $675,000 in the aggregate, and
pay certain individual owners annual consulting fees of $450,000
in the aggregate, in each case, plus certain expenses. See
Certain Relationships and Related Person
Transactions Advisory and Consulting Fees. We
intend to repay the mezzanine debt with proceeds from this
offering, and we expect to terminate the consulting and advisory
agreements concurrent with this offering.
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
As of January 1, 2010, we
changed our loan loss allowance methodology for small
installment loans to determine the allowance using losses from
the trailing eight months, rather than the trailing nine months,
to more accurately reflect the average life of our small
installment loans. The change from nine to eight months of
average losses reduced the loss allowance for small installment
loans by $1.1 million as of January 1, 2010 and
reduced the provision for loan losses by $451,000 for 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Prior to the acquisition
transaction, we had a different capital structure, including a
different number of shares of common stock outstanding.
Accordingly, a comparison of earnings before the acquisition
transaction is not meaningful.
|
| |
|
(4) |
|
Finance receivables equal the total
amount due from the customer, net of unearned finance charges,
insurance premiums and commissions.
|
| |
|
(5) |
|
Net finance receivables equal the
total amount due from the customer, net of unearned finance
charges, insurance premiums and commissions and allowance for
loan losses.
|
| |
|
(6) |
|
The shareholders agreement among
us, Regional Holdings LLC, the sponsors and the individual
owners provides that the individual owners have the right to put
their stock back to us if an initial public offering does not
occur within five years of the date of the acquisition
transaction, March 21, 2007. We valued this put option at
the original purchase price of $12.0 million. The filing of
the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part
relating to this offering makes it probable that the put option
will not become exercisable.
|
|
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Average finance receivables are
computed using the most recent thirteen month-end balances for
the annual periods shown.
|
|
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Our efficiency ratio is calculated
by dividing the sum of general and administrative expenses by
total revenue.
|
| |
|
(9) |
|
All same-store measurements for any
period are calculated based on stores that had been open for at
least one year as of the end of the period.
|
11
RISK
FACTORS
An investment in shares of our common stock involves risks.
You should carefully consider the following information about
these risks, together with the other information contained in
this prospectus, before investing in shares of our common
stock.
Risks Related to
Our Business
We have grown
significantly in recent years and our delinquency and charge-off
rates and overall results of operations may be adversely
affected if we do not manage our growth
effectively.
We have experienced substantial growth in recent years, opening
or acquiring six branches in 2009, 17 in 2010 and 36 in 2011,
and we intend to continue our growth strategy in the future. As
we increase the number of branches we operate, we will be
required to find new, or relocate existing, employees to operate
our branches and allocate resources to train and supervise those
employees. The success of a branch depends significantly on the
manager overseeing its operations and on our ability to enforce
our underwriting standards and implement controls over branch
operations. Recruiting suitable managers for new branches can be
challenging, particularly in remote areas and areas where we
face significant competition. Furthermore, the annual turnover
in 2011 among our branch managers was approximately 23%, and
turnover rates of managers in our new branches may be similar or
higher. Increasing the number of branches that we operate may
divide the attention of our senior management or strain our
ability to adapt our infrastructure and systems to accommodate
our growth. If we are unable to promote, relocate or recruit
suitable managers and oversee their activities effectively, our
delinquency and charge-off rates may increase and our overall
results of operations may be adversely impacted.
We face
significant risks in implementing our growth strategy, some of
which are outside our control.
We intend to continue our growth strategy, which is based on
opening and acquiring branches in existing and new markets and
introducing new products and channels. Our ability to execute
this growth strategy is subject to significant risks, some of
which are beyond our control, including:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
the prevailing laws and regulatory environment of each state in
which we operate or seek to operate, and, to the extent
applicable, federal laws and regulations, which are subject to
change at any time;
|
| |
| |
n
|
the degree of competition in new markets and its effect on our
ability to attract new customers;
|
| |
| |
n
|
our ability to identify attractive locations for new branches;
|
| |
| |
n
|
our ability to recruit qualified personnel, in particular in
remote areas and areas where we face a great deal of
competition; and
|
| |
| |
n
|
our ability to obtain adequate financing for our expansion plans.
|
For example, North Carolina requires a needs and
convenience assessment of a new lending license and
location prior to the granting of the license, which adds time
and expense to opening de novo locations. In addition, certain
states into which we may expand, such as Georgia, limit the
number of lending licenses granted. There can be no assurance
that if we apply for a license for a new branch, whether in one
of the states where we currently operate or in a state into
which we would like to expand, we would be granted a license to
operate. We also cannot be certain that any such license, even
if granted, would be obtained in a timely manner or without
burdensome conditions or limitations. In addition, we may not be
able to obtain and maintain any regulatory approvals, government
permits or licenses that may be required.
We face strong
direct and indirect competition.
The consumer finance industry is highly competitive, and the
barriers to entry for new competitors are relatively low in the
markets in which we operate. We compete for customers, locations
and other important aspects of our business with many other
local, regional, national and international financial
institutions, many of whom have greater financial resources than
we do.
Our installment loan operations compete with other installment
lenders as well as with alternative financial services providers
(such as payday and title lenders, check advance companies and
pawnshops), online or
peer-to-peer
lenders, issuers of non-prime credit cards and other
competitors. We believe that future regulatory developments in
the consumer finance industry may cause lenders that currently
focus on alternative financial services to begin to offer
installment loans. In addition, if companies in the installment
loan business attempt to provide more attractive loan terms than
is standard across the industry, we may lose customers to those
competitors. In installment loans,
12
we compete primarily on the basis of price, breadth of loan
product offerings, flexibility of loan terms offered and the
quality of customer service provided.
Our automobile purchase loan operations compete with numerous
financial services providers, including non-prime auto lenders,
dealers that provide financing, captive finance companies owned
by automobile manufacturers and, to a limited extent, credit
unions. Our furniture and appliance purchase loan operations
compete with store and third-party credit cards, prime lending
sources,
rent-to-own
finance providers and other competitors. Although the furniture
and appliance purchase loan market includes few competitors
serving non-prime borrowers, there are numerous competitors
offering non-prime automobile purchase loans. For automobile
purchase loans and furniture and appliance purchase loans, we
compete primarily on the basis of interest rates charged, the
quality of credit accepted, the flexibility of loan terms
offered, the speed of approval and the quality of customer
service provided.
If we fail to compete successfully, we could face lower sales
and may decide or be compelled to materially alter our lending
terms to our customers, which could result in decreased
profitability.
A substantial
majority of our revenue is generated by our branches in South
Carolina, Texas and North Carolina.
Our branches in South Carolina accounted for 50.1% of our
revenue in 2011. In addition, our branches in Texas and North
Carolina accounted for 21.6% and 15.0%, respectively, of our
revenue in 2011. Furthermore, all of our operations are in four
Southeastern and two Southwestern states. As a result, we are
highly susceptible to adverse economic conditions in those
areas. For example, the unemployment rate in South Carolina,
which was 9.5% in December 2011, is among the highest in
the country. High unemployment rates may reduce the number of
qualified borrowers to whom we will extend loans, which would
result in reduced loan originations. Adverse economic conditions
may increase delinquencies and charge-offs and decrease our
overall loan portfolio quality. If any of the adverse regulatory
or legislative events described in this Risk Factors
section were to occur in South Carolina, Texas or North
Carolina, it could materially adversely affect our business,
results of operations and financial condition. For example, if
interest rates in South Carolina, which are currently not
capped, were to be capped, our business, results of operations
and financial condition would be materially and adversely
affected.
Our business
could suffer if we are unsuccessful in making, continuing and
growing relationships with automobile dealers and furniture and
appliance retailers.
Our automobile purchase loans and furniture and appliance
purchase loans are reliant on our relationships with automobile
dealers and furniture and appliance retailers. In particular,
our automobile purchase loan operations depend in large part
upon our ability to establish and maintain relationships with
reputable dealers who direct customers to our branches or
originate loans at the point of sale, which we subsequently
purchase. Although we have relationships with certain automobile
dealers, none of our relationships are exclusive and some of
them are newly established and they may be terminated at any
time. As a result of the recent economic downturn and
contraction of credit to both dealers and their customers, there
has been an increase in dealership closures and our existing
dealer base has experienced decreased sales and loan volume in
the past and may experience decreased sales and loan volume in
the future, which may have an adverse effect on our business,
our results of operations and financial condition.
Our furniture and appliance purchase loan business model is
based on our ability to enter into agreements with individual
furniture and appliance retailers to provide financing to
customers in their stores. Although our relationships with
independent licensees of a major U.S. furniture retailer
are currently a significant source of our furniture and
appliance purchase loans, we do not have a relationship with the
retailer itself or its manufacturing affiliate and instead
depend on non-exclusive relationships with individual licensees
of the retailer, each of which may be terminated at any time. If
a competitor were to offer better service or more attractive
loan products to our furniture and appliance retailer partners,
it is possible that our retail partners would terminate their
relationships with us. If we are unable to continue to grow our
existing relationships and develop new relationships, our
results of operations and financial condition and ability to
continue to expand could be adversely affected.
Regular
turnover among our managers and other employees at our branches
makes it more difficult for us to operate our branches and
increases our costs of operations, which could have an adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Our workforce is comprised primarily of employees who work on an
hourly basis. In certain areas where we operate, there is
significant competition for employees. In the past, we have lost
employees and candidates to competitors who have been willing to
pay higher compensation than we pay. Our ability to continue to
expand our operations depends on our ability to attract, train
and retain a large and growing number of qualified employees.
The turnover
13
among our all of our branch employees was approximately 43% in
2010 and 37% in 2011. This turnover increases our cost of
operations and makes it more difficult to operate our branches.
Our customer service representative and assistant manager roles
have historically experienced high turnover. We may not be able
to retain and cultivate personnel at these ranks for future
promotion to branch manager. If our employee turnover rates
increase above historical levels or if unanticipated problems
arise from our high employee turnover and we are unable to
readily replace such employees, our business, results of
operations and financial condition and ability to continue to
expand could be adversely affected.
We are subject
to government regulations concerning our hourly and our other
employees, including minimum wage, overtime and health care
laws.
We are subject to applicable rules and regulations relating to
our relationship with our employees, including minimum wage and
break requirements, health benefits, unemployment and sales
taxes, overtime and working conditions and immigration status.
Legislated increases in the federal minimum wage and increases
in additional labor cost components, such as employee benefit
costs, workers compensation insurance rates, compliance
costs and fines, as well as the cost of litigation in connection
with these regulations, would increase our labor costs.
Unionizing and collective bargaining efforts have received
increased attention nationwide in recent periods. Should our
employees become represented by unions, we would be obligated to
bargain with those unions with respect to wages, hours and other
terms and conditions of employment, which is likely to increase
our labor costs. Moreover, as part of the process of union
organizing and collective bargaining, strikes and other work
stoppages may occur, which would cause disruption to our
business. Similarly, many employers nationally in similar retail
environments have been subject to actions brought by
governmental agencies and private individuals under
wage-hour
laws on a variety of claims, such as improper classification of
workers as exempt from overtime pay requirements and failure to
pay overtime wages properly, with such actions sometimes brought
as class actions and these actions can result in material
liabilities and expenses. Should we be subject to employment
litigation, such as actions involving
wage-hour,
overtime, break and working time, it may distract our management
from business matters and result in increased labor costs. In
addition, we currently sponsor employer-subsidized premiums for
major medical programs for eligible salaried personnel and
mini-medical (limited benefit) programs for eligible
hourly employees who elect health care coverage through our
insurance programs. As a result of regulatory changes, we may
not be able to continue to offer health care coverage to our
employees on affordable terms or at all. If we are unable to
locate, attract, train or retain qualified personnel, or if our
costs of labor increase significantly, our business, results of
operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
Our live check
direct mail strategy exposes us to certain risks.
A significant portion of our growth in our small installment
loans has been achieved through our direct mail campaigns, which
involve mailing to pre-screened recipients live
checks, which customers can sign and cash or deposit
thereby agreeing to the terms of the loan, which are disclosed
on the front and back of the check. We use live checks to seed
new branch openings and attract new customers and those with
higher credit in our geographic footprint. Loans initiated
through live checks represented approximately one quarter of the
value of our originated loans. We expect that live checks will
represent a greater percentage of our small installment loans in
the future. There are several risks associated with the use of
live checks including the following:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
it is more difficult to maintain sound underwriting standards
with live check customers, and these customers have historically
presented a higher risk of default than customers that originate
loans in our branches, as we do not meet a live check customer
prior to soliciting them and extending a loan to them, and we
may not be able to verify certain elements of their financial
condition, including their current employment status or life
circumstances;
|
| |
| |
n
|
we rely on a software-based model and credit information from a
third-party credit bureau that is more limited than a full
credit report to pre-screen potential live check recipients,
which may not be as effective or may be inaccurate or outdated;
|
| |
| |
n
|
we face limitations on the number of potential borrowers who
meet our lending criteria within proximity to our branches;
|
| |
| |
n
|
we may not be able to continue to access the demographic and
credit file information that we use to generate our mailing
lists due to expanded regulatory or privacy restrictions;
|
| |
| |
n
|
live checks pose a greater risk of fraud as the live checks may
be fraudulently replicated;
|
| |
| |
n
|
we depend on one bank to issue and clear our live checks and any
failure by that bank to properly process the live checks could
limit the ability of a recipient to cash the check and enter
into a loan with us;
|
| |
| |
n
|
we sell clearly disclosed optional credit insurance products as
part of our live check mailing campaigns;
|
14
|
|
|
| |
|
however, customers may subsequently claim that they did not
receive sufficient explanation or notice of the insurance
products that they purchased;
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
customers may opt out of direct mail solicitations and
solicitations based on their credit file or may otherwise
prohibit us from soliciting them; and
|
| |
| |
n
|
postal rates and piece printing rates may continue to rise.
|
Our expected increase in the use of live checks will further
increase our exposure to, and the magnitude of, these risks.
A reduction in
demand for our products and failure by us to adapt to such
reduction could adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
The demand for the products we offer may be reduced due to a
variety of factors, such as demographic patterns, changes in
customer preferences or financial conditions, regulatory
restrictions that decrease customer access to particular
products or the availability of competing products. For example,
we are highly dependent upon selecting and maintaining
attractive branch locations. These locations are subject to
local market conditions, including the employment available in
the area, housing costs, traffic patterns, crime and other
demographic influences, any of which may quickly change. Should
we fail to adapt to significant changes in our customers
demand for, or access to, our products, our revenues could
decrease significantly and our operations could be harmed. Even
if we do make changes to existing products or introduce new
products to fulfill customer demand, customers may resist or may
reject such products. Moreover, the effect of any product change
on the results of our business may not be fully ascertainable
until the change has been in effect for some time and by that
time it may be too late to make further modifications to such
product without causing further harm to our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
We may attempt
to pursue acquisitions or strategic alliances, which may be
unsuccessful.
We may attempt to achieve our business objectives through
acquisitions and strategic alliances. We compete with other
companies for these opportunities, including companies with
greater financial resources, and we cannot be certain that we
will be able to effect acquisitions or strategic alliances on
commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Furthermore, the
acquisitions that we have pursued previously have been
significantly smaller than us. We do not have experience with
integrating larger acquisitions, such as the Alabama branch
acquisition. In pursuing these transactions, we may experience,
among other things:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
overvaluing potential targets due to limitations on our due
diligence efforts;
|
| |
| |
n
|
difficulties in integrating any acquired companies, branches or
products into our existing business, including integration of
account data into our information systems;
|
| |
| |
n
|
inability to realize the benefits we anticipate in a timely
fashion, or at all;
|
| |
| |
n
|
attrition of key personnel from acquired businesses;
|
| |
| |
n
|
unexpected losses due to the acquisition of existing loan
portfolios with loans originated using less stringent
underwriting criteria;
|
| |
| |
n
|
significant costs, charges or writedowns; or
|
| |
| |
n
|
unforeseen operating difficulties that require significant
financial and managerial resources that would otherwise be
available for the ongoing development and expansion of our
existing operations.
|
We are exposed
to credit risk in our lending activities.
Our ability to collect on loans depends on the willingness and
repayment ability of our borrowers. Any material adverse change
in the ability or willingness of a significant portion of our
borrowers to meet their obligations to us, whether due to
changes in economic conditions, the cost of consumer goods,
interest rates, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism, or
other causes over which we have no control, would have a
material adverse impact on our earnings and financial condition.
Further, a substantial majority of our borrowers are non-prime
borrowers, who are more likely to be affected, and more severely
affected, by adverse macroeconomic conditions such as those that
have persisted over the last few years. We generally consider
customers with a Beacon score, a measure of credit provided by
Equifax, below 645 to be non-prime borrowers, although we also
consider factors other than Beacon scores in evaluating a
potential customers credit, such as length of employment
and duration of current residence. There is no industry standard
definition of non-prime and, consequently, other lenders may use
different criteria to identify non-prime customers. These
criteria have not changed in the past three years. We cannot be
certain that our
15
credit administration personnel, policies and procedures will
adequately adapt to changes in economic or any other conditions
affecting customers and the quality of the loan portfolio.
We may be
limited in our ability to collect on our loan portfolio and the
security interests securing a significant portion of our loan
portfolio are not perfected, which may increase our loan
losses.
Legal and practical limitations may limit our ability to collect
on our loan portfolio, resulting in increased loan losses,
decreased revenues and decreased earnings. State and federal
laws and regulations restrict our collection efforts.
All of our loan portfolio is secured, but a significant portion
of such security interests have not been and will not be
perfected. The amounts that we are able to recover from the
repossession and sale of this collateral typically does not
cover the outstanding loan balance and costs of recovery. In
cases where we repossess a vehicle securing a loan, we sell our
repossessed automobile inventory through public sales conducted
by independent automobile auction organizations after the
required post-repossession waiting period. There is
approximately a
30-day
period between the time we repossess a vehicle or other property
and the time it is sold at auction. In certain instances, we may
sell repossessed collateral other than vehicles through our
branches after the required post-repossession waiting period and
appropriate receipt of valid bids. The proceeds we receive from
such sales depend upon various factors, including the supply of,
and demand for, used vehicles and other property at the time of
sale. During periods of economic slowdown or recession, such as
have existed in the United States for much of the past few
years, there may be less demand for used vehicles and other
property.
Further, a significant portion of our loan portfolio is not
secured by perfected security interests, including small
installment loans and furniture and appliance purchase loans.
The lack of perfected security interests is one of several
factors that may make it more difficult for us to collect on our
loan portfolio. During 2011, net charge-offs as a percentage of
average finance receivables on our small installment loans,
which are secured by unperfected interests in personal property,
were 9.1%, while net charge-offs as a percentage of average
finance receivables for our large installment loans and
automobile purchase loans, which are secured by perfected
interests in an automobile or other vehicle, for the same
periods were 4.2%. Lastly, given the relatively small size of
our loans, the costs of collecting loans may be high relative to
the amount of the loan. As a result, many collection practices
that are legally available, such as litigation, may be
financially impracticable. These factors may increase our loan
losses, which would have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition.
Our policies
and procedures for underwriting, processing and servicing loans
are subject to potential failure or circumvention, which may
adversely affect our results of operations.
Most of our underwriting activities and our credit extension
decisions are made at our local branches. We train our employees
individually
on-site in
the branch to make loans that conform to our underwriting
standards. Such training includes critical aspects of state and
federal regulatory compliance, cash handling, account management
and customer relations. Although we have standardized employee
manuals, we primarily rely on our 17 district supervisors,
with oversight by our state vice presidents, branch auditors and
headquarters personnel, to train and supervise our branch
employees, rather than centralized or standardized training
programs. Therefore, the quality of training and supervision may
vary from district to district and branch to branch depending
upon the amount of time apportioned to training and supervision
and individual interpretations of our operations policies and
procedures. We cannot be certain that every loan is made in
accordance with our underwriting standards and rules. We have in
the past experienced some instances of loans extended that
varied from our underwriting standards. Variances in
underwriting standards and lack of supervision could expose us
to greater delinquencies and charge-offs than we have
historically experienced.
If our
estimates of loan losses are not adequate to absorb actual
losses, our provision for loan losses would increase, which
would adversely affect our results of operations.
We maintain an allowance for loan losses for all loans we make.
To estimate the appropriate level of loan loss reserves, we
consider known and relevant internal and external factors that
affect loan collectability, including the total amount of loans
outstanding, historical loan charge-offs, our current collection
patterns and economic trends. Our methodology for establishing
our reserves for doubtful accounts is based in large part on our
historic loss experience. If customer behavior changes as a
result of economic conditions and if we are unable to predict
how the unemployment rate, housing foreclosures and general
economic uncertainty may affect our loan loss reserves, our
provision may be inadequate. In 2011, our provision for loan
losses was $17.9 million, and we had net charge-offs in
2011 of $16.6 million related to losses on our loans. As of
December 31, 2011, our finance receivables were
$306.6 million. Maintaining the adequacy of our allowance
for loan losses may require that we make significant and
unanticipated increases in our provisions for loan losses, which
would materially affect our results of operations. Our
16
loan loss reserves, however, are estimates, and if actual loan
losses are materially greater than our loan loss reserves, our
financial condition and results of operations could be adversely
affected. Neither state regulators nor federal regulators
regulate our allowance for loan losses. Additional information
regarding our allowance for loan losses is included in the
section captioned Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Critical Accounting Policies
Loan Losses.
Interest rates
on automobile purchase and furniture and appliance purchase
loans are determined at competitive market interest rates and we
may fail to adequately set interest rates, which may adversely
affect our business.
In recent years, we have expanded our automobile purchase loan
business and our furniture and appliance purchase loan business
and we plan to continue to expand those businesses in the
future. Unlike installment loans, which in certain states are
typically made at or near the maximum interest rates permitted
by law, automobile purchase loans and furniture and appliance
purchase loans are often made at competitive market interest
rates, which are governed by laws for installment sales
contracts. We have limited experience in determining interest
rates in these markets. If we fail to set interest rates at a
level that adequately reflects the credit risks of our
customers, or if we set interest rates at a level too low to
sustain our profitability, our business, results of operations
and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Failure of
third-party service providers upon which we rely could adversely
affect our business.
We rely on certain third-party service providers. In particular,
we currently rely on a single vendor to print and mail our live
checks for our direct mail marketing campaigns. Our reliance on
third parties such as this can expose us to risks. For example,
an error by our previous live check vendor during 2010 resulted
in checks being misdirected, requiring us in some cases to
notify state regulators, refund certain interest and fee amounts
and exposing us to increased credit risk. In addition, we do not
have ongoing contracts with live check vendors, but instead
enter into individual purchase orders for each of our campaigns.
As a result, we have no contractual assurance that any
particular vendor will be able or willing to provide these
services to us on favorable terms. If any of our third-party
service providers, including our live check vendors, are unable
to provide their services timely and effectively, or at all, it
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations and cash flows.
We depend to a
substantial extent on borrowings under our senior revolving
credit facility to fund our liquidity needs.
We have a senior revolving credit facility committed through
January 2015 that allows us to borrow up to $255.0 million,
assuming we are in compliance with a number of covenants and
conditions. As of December 31, 2011, as adjusted to give
effect to the offering and the application of the estimated net
proceeds therefrom as described under Use of
Proceeds, the amount outstanding under our senior
revolving credit facility would have been
$ million, and we would have
had $ million of remaining
availability thereunder out of a total availability of
$ million based on our
borrowing base as of December 31, 2011. During the year
ended December 31, 2011, the maximum amount of borrowings
outstanding under the facility at one time was
$206.4 million. We use our senior revolving credit facility
as a source of liquidity, including for working capital and to
fund the loans we make to our customers. If our existing sources
of liquidity become insufficient to satisfy our financial needs
or our access to these sources becomes unexpectedly restricted,
we may need to try to raise additional debt or equity in the
future. If such an event were to occur, we can give no assurance
that such alternate sources of liquidity would be available to
us on favorable terms or at all. In addition, we cannot be
certain that we will be able to replace the amended and restated
senior revolving credit facility when it matures on favorable
terms or at all. If any of these events occur, our business,
results of operations and financial condition could be adversely
affected.
We are not insulated from the pressures and potentially negative
consequences of the recent financial crisis and similar risks
beyond our control that have and may continue to affect the
capital and credit markets, the broader economy, the financial
services industry or the segment of that industry in which we
operate.
We are subject
to interest rate risk resulting from general economic conditions
and policies of various governmental and regulatory
agencies.
Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are
beyond our control, including general economic conditions and
policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in
particular, the Federal Reserve Board. Changes in monetary
policy, including changes in interest rates, could influence the
amount of interest we pay on our senior revolving credit
facility or any other floating interest rate obligations we may
incur, which would increase our operating costs and decrease our
operating margins. Interest payable on our senior revolving
credit facility is variable, based on LIBOR with a LIBOR floor
of 1.00% and could increase in the future. Although we have
purchased interest rate caps on a $150.0 million notional
amount to hedge such increases, these caps expire in
17
2014 and we may not be able to replace these instruments when
they mature on favorable terms or at all. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources. Furthermore, market conditions or
regulatory restrictions on interest rates we charge may prevent
us from passing any increases in interest rates along to our
customers.
Our revolving
credit agreement contains restrictions and limitations that
could affect our ability to operate our business.
The credit agreement governing our senior revolving credit
facility contains a number of covenants that could adversely
affect our business and the flexibility to respond to changing
business and economic conditions or opportunities. Among other
things, these covenants limit our ability to:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
incur or guarantee additional indebtedness;
|
| |
| |
n
|
purchase large loan portfolios in bulk;
|
| |
| |
n
|
pay dividends or make distributions on our capital stock or make
certain other restricted payments;
|
| |
| |
n
|
sell assets, including our loan portfolio or the capital stock
of our subsidiaries;
|
| |
| |
n
|
enter into transactions with our affiliates;
|
| |
| |
n
|
create or incur liens; and
|
| |
| |
n
|
consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or
substantially all of our assets.
|
In addition, the credit agreement imposes certain obligations on
us relating to our underwriting standards, recordkeeping and
servicing of our loans, and our loss reserves and charge-off
policies. It also requires us to maintain certain financial
ratios, including an interest coverage ratio and a borrowing
base ratio (calculated as the ratio of our unsubordinated debt
to the sum of our adjusted tangible net worth and our
subordinated debt).
If we were to breach any covenants or obligations under the
credit agreement and such breaches were to result in an event of
default, our lenders could cause all amounts outstanding to
become due and payable, subject to applicable grace periods.
This could trigger cross-defaults under any future debt
instruments and materially and adversely affect our financial
condition and ability to continue operating our business as a
going concern. As of December 31, 2011 and upon amendment
on January 18, 2012, we were in compliance with the
covenants under our senior revolving credit facility and our
mezzanine debt agreement.
If we lose the
services of any of our key management personnel, our business
could suffer.
Our future success significantly depends on the continued
service and performance of our key management personnel.
Competition for these employees is intense. The loss of the
service of members of our senior management or key team members,
including our state vice presidents, or the inability to attract
additional qualified personnel as needed could materially harm
our business. Our success depends, in part, on the continued
service of our President and Chief Operating Officer, C. Glynn
Quattlebaum, who is 65 years old and our Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, Robert D. Barry, who is
68. Both of these executive officers are nearing the age of
retirement.
We also depend on our 17 district supervisors to supervise,
train and motivate our branch employees. These supervisors have
significant experience with the company and would be difficult
to replace. If we lose a district supervisor to a competitor, we
could be at risk of losing other employees and customers despite
the confidentiality agreements and non-solicitation agreements
we have entered into with each employee.
We rely on
information technology products developed, owned and supported
by third parties, including our competitors.
We use a software package developed and owned by ParaData
Financial Systems (ParaData), a wholly owned
subsidiary of World Acceptance Corporation, one of our primary
competitors, to record, document and manage our loans. Over the
years we have tailored this software to meet our specific needs.
We depend on the willingness and ability of ParaData to continue
to provide customized solutions and support for our evolving
products and business model. In the future, ParaData may not be
able to modify the loan management software to meet our needs,
or they could alter the program without notice to us or cease to
adequately support it. ParaData could also decide in the future
to refuse to provide support for its software to us on
commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If any of these events
were to occur, we would be forced to migrate to an alternative
software package, which could materially affect our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
We rely on DealerTrack, Route One, Teledata Communications Inc.
and other third-party software vendors to provide access to loan
applications
and/or
screen applications. There can be no assurance that these third
party providers
18
will continue to provide us information in accordance with our
lending guidelines or that they will continue to provide us
lending leads at all. If this occurs, our loan losses, business,
results of operations and financial condition may be adversely
affected.
Security
breaches in our branches or in our information systems could
adversely affect our financial conditions and results of
operations.
All of our account payments occur at our branches, either in
person or by mail, and frequently consist of cash payments,
which we deposit at local banks throughout the day. This
business practice exposes us daily to the potential for employee
theft of funds or, alternatively, to theft and burglary due to
the cash we maintain in the branch. Despite controls and
procedures to prevent such losses, we have in the past sustained
losses due to employee fraud and theft. In addition, our
employees field call delinquent accounts by visiting
the home or workplace of a delinquent borrower. Such visits may
subject our employees to a variety of dangers including
violence, vehicle accidents and other perils. A breach in the
security of our branches or in the safety of our employees could
result in employee injury and adverse publicity and could result
in a loss of customer business or expose us to civil litigation
and possible financial liability, any of which could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operations.
We rely heavily on communications and information systems to
conduct our business. Each branch is part of an information
network that is designed to permit us to maintain adequate cash
inventory, reconcile cash balances on a daily basis and report
revenues and expenses to our headquarters. Any failure,
interruption or breach in security of these systems, including
any failure of our
back-up
systems, could result in failures or disruptions in our customer
relationship management, general ledger, loan and other systems
and could result in a loss of customer business, subject us to
additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose us to civil litigation
and possible financial liability, any of which could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operations.
Our
centralized headquarters functions are susceptible to
disruption by catastrophic events, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
Our headquarters buildings are located in Greenville, South
Carolina. Our information systems and administrative and
management processes are primarily provided to our branches from
this centralized location, and our separate data management
facility is located in the same city, and these processes could
be disrupted if a catastrophic event, such as a tornado, power
outage or act of terror, affected Greenville. Any such
catastrophic event or other unexpected disruption of our
headquarters or data management facility could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
Risks Related to
Regulation
Our business
products and activities are strictly and comprehensively
regulated at the local, state and federal level. Changes in
current laws and regulations or in the interpretation of such
laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Our business is subject to numerous local, state and federal
laws and regulations. These regulations impose significant costs
or limitations on the way we conduct or expand our business and
these costs or limitations may increase in the future if such
laws and regulations are changed. These laws and regulations
govern or affect, among other things:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
the interest rates that we may charge customers;
|
| |
| |
n
|
terms of loans, including fees, maximum amounts and minimum
durations;
|
| |
| |
n
|
the number of simultaneous or consecutive loans and required
waiting periods between loans;
|
| |
| |
n
|
disclosure practices, including posting of fees;
|
| |
| |
n
|
currency and suspicious activity reporting;
|
| |
| |
n
|
recording and reporting of certain financial transactions;
|
| |
| |
n
|
privacy of personal customer information;
|
| |
| |
n
|
the types of products and services that we may offer;
|
| |
| |
n
|
collection practices;
|
| |
| |
n
|
approval of licenses; and
|
| |
| |
n
|
locations of our branches.
|
19
Our primary regulators are the state regulators for the states
in which we operate: South Carolina, Texas, North Carolina,
Tennessee, Alabama and Oklahoma. See Business
Government Regulation. We operate each of our branches
under licenses granted to us by these state regulators. State
regulators may enter our branches and conduct audits of our
records and practices at any time, with or without notice. If we
fail to observe, or are not able to comply with, applicable
legal requirements, we may be forced to discontinue certain
product offerings, which could adversely impact our business,
results of operations and financial condition. In addition,
violation of these laws and regulations could result in fines
and other civil
and/or
criminal penalties, including the suspension or revocation of
our branch licenses, rendering us unable to operate in one or
more locations. All the states in which we operate have laws
governing the interest rate and fees that we can charge and
required disclosure statements, among other restrictions.
Violation of these laws could involve penalties requiring the
forfeiture of principal
and/or
interest and fees that we have charged. Depending on the nature
and scope of a violation, fines and other penalties for
noncompliance of applicable requirements could be significant
and could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operation and financial condition.
Licenses to open new branches are granted in the discretion of
state regulators. Accordingly, licenses may be denied
unexpectedly or for reasons outside our control. This could
hinder our ability to implement our business plan in a timely
manner or at all.
As we enter new markets and develop new products, we may become
subject to additional state and federal regulations. For
example, although we intend to expand into new states, we may
encounter unexpected regulatory or other difficulties in these
new states or markets, which may prevent us from growing in new
states or markets. Similarly, while we intend to grow our
furniture and appliance purchase and indirect automobile
purchase loan operations, we may encounter unexpected regulatory
or other difficulties. As a result, we may not be able to
successfully execute our strategies to grow our revenue and
earnings.
Changes in
laws and regulations or interpretations of laws and regulations
could negatively impact our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
Although many of the laws and regulations applicable to our
business have remained substantially unchanged for many years,
the laws and regulations directly affecting our lending
activities are under review and are subject to change,
especially as a result of current economic conditions, changes
in the
make-up of
the current executive and legislative branches and the political
focus on issues of consumer and borrower protection. In
addition, consumer advocacy groups and various other media
sources continue to advocate for governmental and regulatory
action to prohibit or severely restrict various financial
products, including the loan products we offer.
Any changes in such laws and regulations could force us to
modify, suspend or cease part or, in the worst case, all of our
existing operations. It is also possible that the scope of
federal regulations could change or expand in such a way as to
preempt what has traditionally been state law regulation of our
business activities. The enactment of one or more of such
regulatory changes could materially and adversely affect our
business, results of operations and prospects.
States may also seek to impose new requirements or interpret or
enforce existing requirements in new ways. Changes in current
laws or regulations or the implementation of new laws or
regulations in the future may restrict our ability to continue
our current methods of operation or expand our operations.
Additionally, these laws and regulations could subject us to
liability for prior operating activities or lower or eliminate
the profitability of operations going forward by, among other
things, reducing the amount of interest and fees we charge in
connection with our loans. If these or other factors lead us to
close our branches in a state, in addition to the loss of net
revenues attributable to that closing, we would incur closing
costs such as lease cancellation payments and we would have to
write off assets that we could no longer use. If we were to
suspend rather than permanently cease our operations in a state,
we would also have continuing costs associated with maintaining
our branches and our employees in that state, with little or no
revenues to offset those costs.
We maintain a relationship with our primary regulator in each of
the states in which we operate, participate in national and
state industry associations and actively monitor the regulatory
environment, and we are currently unaware of any specific
proposal that would change the laws and regulations under which
we operate in a manner material to our business.
In addition to state and federal laws and regulations, our
business is subject to various local rules and regulations such
as local zoning regulations. Local zoning boards and other local
governing bodies have been increasingly
20
restricting the permitted locations of other consumer finance
companies, such as payday lenders and pawn shops. Any future
actions taken to require special use permits for, or impose
other restrictions on, our ability to provide products could
adversely affect our ability to expand our operations or force
us to attempt to relocate existing branches. If we were forced
to relocate any of our branches, in addition to the costs
associated with the relocation, we may be required to hire new
employees in the new areas, which may adversely impact the
operations of those branches. Relocation of an existing branch
may also hinder our collection abilities, as our business model
relies on the location of our branches being close to where our
customers live in order to successfully collect on outstanding
loans.
Changes in laws or regulations may have a material adverse
effect on all aspects of our business in a particular state and
on our overall business, results of operations and financial
condition.
The Dodd-Frank
Act authorizes the newly created CFPB to adopt rules that could
potentially have a serious impact on our ability to offer
short-term consumer loans and have a material adverse effect on
our operations and financial performance.
Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act establishes the CFPB, which
become operational on July 21, 2011. Under the Dodd-Frank
Act, the CFPB has regulatory, supervisory and enforcement powers
over providers of consumer financial products that we offer,
including explicit supervisory authority to examine and require
registration of installment lenders such as ourselves. Included
in the powers afforded to the CFPB is the authority to adopt
rules describing specified acts and practices as being
unfair, deceptive or
abusive, and hence unlawful. Specifically, the CFPB
has the authority to declare an act or practice abusive if it,
among other things, materially interferes with the ability of a
consumer to understand a term or condition of a consumer
financial product or service or takes unreasonable advantage of
a lack of understanding on the part of the consumer of the
product or service. Although the Dodd-Frank Act expressly
provides that the CFPB has no authority to establish usury
limits, some consumer advocacy groups have suggested that
certain forms of alternative consumer finance products, such as
installment loans, should be a regulatory priority and it is
possible that at some time in the future the CFPB could propose
and adopt rules making such lending or other products that we
may offer materially less profitable or impractical. Further,
the CFPB may target specific features of loans or loan
practices, such as refinancings, by rulemaking that could cause
us to cease offering certain products or engaging in certain
practices. It is possible that the CFPB will adopt rules that
specifically restrict refinancings of existing loans. Our
refinancings of existing loans are divided into three
categories: refinancings of loans in an amount greater than the
original loan amount, renewals of existing loans that are
current and renewals of existing loans that are delinquent,
which represented 15.6%, 35.6% and 0.8%, respectively, of our
loan originations in 2011. Any such rules could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operation and
financial condition. The CFPB could also adopt rules imposing
new and potentially burdensome requirements and limitations with
respect to any of our current or future lines of business, which
could have a material adverse effect on our operations and
financial performance. The Dodd-Frank Act also gives the CFPB
the authority to examine and regulate entities it classifies as
a larger participant of a market for other consumer
financial products or services. The rule will likely cover
only the largest installment lenders. We do not yet know whether
the definition of larger participant will cover us. See
Business Government Regulation
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of
2010.
In addition to the Dodd-Frank Acts grant of regulatory
powers to the CFPB, the Dodd-Frank Act gives the CFPB authority
to pursue administrative proceedings or litigation for
violations of federal consumer financial laws. In these
proceedings, the CFPB can obtain cease and desist orders (which
can include orders for restitution or rescission of contracts,
as well as other kinds of affirmative relief) and monetary
penalties ranging from $5,000 per day for minor violations of
federal consumer financial laws (including the CFPBs own
rules) to $25,000 per day for reckless violations and
$1 million per day for knowing violations. If we are
subject to such administrative proceedings, litigation, orders
or monetary penalties in the future, this could have a material
adverse effect on our operations and financial performance.
Also, where a company has violated Title X of the
Dodd-Frank Act or CFPB regulations under Title X, the
Dodd-Frank Act empowers state attorneys general and state
regulators to bring civil actions for the kind of cease and
desist orders available to the CFPB (but not for civil
penalties). If the CFPB or one or more state officials find that
we have violated the foregoing laws, they could exercise their
enforcement powers in ways that would have a material adverse
effect on us.
Our stock
price or results of operations could be adversely affected by
media and public perception of installment loans and of
legislative and regulatory developments affecting activities
within the installment lending sector.
Consumer advocacy groups and various media sources continue to
criticize alternative financial services providers (such as
payday and title lenders, check advance companies and
pawnshops). These critics frequently characterize
21
such alternative financial services providers as predatory or
abusive toward consumers. If these persons were to criticize the
products that we offer, it could result in further regulation of
our business. Furthermore, our industry is highly regulated, and
announcements regarding new or expected governmental and
regulatory action in the alternative financial services sector
may adversely impact our stock price and perceptions of our
business even if such actions are not targeted at our operations
and do not directly impact us.
Risks Related to
this Offering
There may not
be an active trading market for shares of our common stock,
which may cause shares of our common stock to trade at a
discount from the initial offering price and make it difficult
to sell the shares of common stock you purchase.
Prior to this offering, there has not been a public trading
market for shares of our common stock. It is possible that after
this offering an active trading market will not develop or
continue or, if developed, that any market will be sustained
which would make it difficult for you to sell your shares of
common stock at an attractive price or at all. The initial
public offering price per share of common stock will be
determined by agreement among us and the representatives of the
underwriters, and may not be indicative of the price at which
shares of our common stock will trade in the public market after
this offering.
If securities
or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about
our business, or if they downgrade their recommendations
regarding our common stock, our stock price and trading volume
could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by
the research and reports that industry or securities analysts
publish about us or our business. If any of the analysts who
covers us downgrades our common stock or publishes inaccurate or
unfavorable research about our business, our common stock price
may decline. If analysts cease coverage of us or fail to
regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the
financial markets, which in turn could cause our common stock
price or trading volume to decline and our common stock to be
less liquid.
The market
price of shares of our common stock may be volatile, which could
cause the value of your investment to decline.
Even if a trading market develops, the market price of our
common stock may be highly volatile and could be subject to wide
fluctuations. Securities markets worldwide experience
significant price and volume fluctuations. This market
volatility, as well as general economic, market or political
conditions, could reduce the market price of shares of our
common stock in spite of our operating performance. In addition,
our operating results could be below the expectations of public
market analysts and investors due to a number of potential
factors, including variations in our quarterly operating
results, additions or departures of key management personnel,
failure to meet analysts earnings estimates, publication
of research reports about our industry, litigation and
government investigations, changes or proposed changes in laws
or regulations or differing interpretations or enforcement
thereof affecting our business, adverse market reaction to any
indebtedness we may incur or securities we may issue in the
future, changes in market valuations of similar companies or
speculation in the press or investment community, announcements
by our competitors of significant contracts, acquisitions,
dispositions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital
commitments, adverse publicity about the industries we
participate in or individual scandals, and in response the
market price of shares of our common stock could decrease
significantly. You may be unable to resell your shares of common
stock at or above the initial public offering price.
In the past few years, stock markets have experienced extreme
price and volume fluctuations. In the past, following periods of
volatility in the overall market and the market price of a
companys securities, securities class action litigation
has often been instituted against these companies. This
litigation, if instituted against us, could result in
substantial costs and a diversion of our managements
attention and resources.
Investors in
this offering will suffer immediate and substantial
dilution.
The initial public offering price per share of common stock will
be substantially higher than our pro forma net tangible book
value per share immediately after this offering. As a result,
you will pay a price per share of common stock that
substantially exceeds the per share book value of our tangible
assets after subtracting our liabilities. In addition, you will
pay more for your shares of common stock than the amounts paid
by our existing owners. Assuming an offering price of
$ per share of common stock, which
is the midpoint of the range on the front cover of this
prospectus, you will incur immediate and substantial dilution in
an amount of $ per share of common
stock. See Dilution.
22
Because we
have no current plans to pay cash dividends on our common stock
for the foreseeable future, you may not receive any return on
investment unless you sell your common stock for a price greater
than that which you paid for it.
We intend to retain future earnings, if any, for future
operation, expansion and debt repayment and have no current
plans to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. The
declaration, amount and payment of any future dividends on
shares of common stock will be at the sole discretion of our
board of directors. Our board of directors may take into account
general and economic conditions, our financial condition and
results of operations, our available cash and current and
anticipated cash needs, capital requirements, contractual,
legal, tax and regulatory restrictions and implications on the
payment of dividends by us to our stockholders or by our
subsidiaries to us and such other factors as our board of
directors may deem relevant. In addition, our ability to pay
dividends may be limited by covenants of any existing and future
outstanding indebtedness we or our subsidiaries incur, including
our senior revolving credit facility. As a result, you may not
receive any return on an investment in our common stock unless
you sell our common stock for a price greater than that which
you paid for it.
You may be
diluted by the future issuance of additional common stock in
connection with our incentive plans, acquisitions or
otherwise.
After this offering we will have
approximately million shares
of common stock authorized but unissued. Our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation to become effective
immediately prior to the consummation of this offering
authorizes us to issue these shares of common stock and options,
rights, warrants and appreciation rights relating to common
stock for the consideration and on the terms and conditions
established by our board of directors in its sole discretion,
whether in connection with acquisitions or otherwise. We have
reserved 950,000 shares for issuance under our 2011 Stock
Plan, including 280,000 shares issuable upon the exercise
of stock options that we intend to grant to our executive
officers and directors and 30,000 shares issuable upon the
exercise of stock options that we intend to grant to our other
employees, each at the time of this offering with an exercise
price equal to the initial public offering price. See
Management Compensation Discussion and
Analysis 2011 Stock Incentive Plan and
Actions Taken in 2012 and Anticipated Actions
in Connection with the Offering. Any common stock that we
issue, including under our 2011 Stock Plan or other equity
incentive plans that we may adopt in the future, would dilute
the percentage ownership held by the investors who purchase
common stock in this offering.
If we or our
existing investors sell additional shares of our common stock
after this offering, the market price of our common stock could
decline.
The sale of substantial amounts of shares of our common stock in
the public market, or the perception that such sales could
occur, could harm the prevailing market price of shares of our
common stock. These sales, or the possibility that these sales
may occur, also might make it more difficult for us to sell
equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we
deem appropriate. Upon consummation of this offering we will
have a total
of shares
of our common stock outstanding. Of the outstanding shares,
the shares
sold in this offering
(or shares
if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in
full) will be freely tradable without restriction or further
registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act), except that any shares held by our
affiliates, as that term is defined under Rule 144 of the
Securities Act, may be sold only in compliance with the
limitations described in Shares Eligible for Future
Sale.
The
remaining shares,
representing % of our total
outstanding shares of our common stock following this offering,
will be subject to certain restrictions on resale following the
consummation of this offering. We, our officers, directors and
holders of substantially all of our outstanding shares of common
stock immediately prior to this offering have signed
lock-up
agreements with the underwriters that will, subject to certain
exceptions, restrict the sale of the shares of our common stock
held by them for 180 days following the date of this
prospectus, subject to extension in the case of an earnings
release or material news or a material event relating to us.
Jefferies & Company, Inc. may, in its sole discretion
and without notice, release all or any portion of the shares of
common stock subject to
lock-up
agreements. See Underwriting (Conflicts of Interest)
for a description of these
lock-up
agreements.
Upon the expiration of the
lock-up
agreements described above, all of
such shares
will be eligible for resale in a public market, subject, in the
case of shares held by our affiliates, to volume, manner of sale
and other limitations under Rule 144. We expect that each
of the sponsors will be considered affiliates 180 days
after this offering based on their expected share ownership
(consisting
of shares
owned by Palladium
and shares
owned by Parallel assuming no exercise of the underwriters
option to purchase additional shares), as well as their board
nomination rights. Certain other of our shareholders may also be
considered affiliates at that time. In addition, commencing
180 days following this offering, the holders of these
shares of common stock will have the
23
right, subject to certain exceptions and conditions, to require
us to register their shares of common stock under the Securities
Act, and they will have the right to participate in future
registrations of securities by us. Registration of any of these
outstanding shares of common stock would result in such shares
becoming freely tradable without compliance with Rule 144
upon effectiveness of the registration statement. See
Shares Eligible for Future Sale.
In
addition, shares
of common stock will be eligible for sale upon exercise of
vested options subject to the agreements described above.
Following this offering, we intend to file one or more
registration statements on
Form S-8
under the Securities Act to register shares of common stock or
securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common
stock issued under or covered by our 2011 Stock Plan. Any such
Form S-8
registration statements will automatically become effective upon
filing. We expect that the initial registration statement on
Form S-8
will
cover shares
of common stock. Once these shares are registered, they can be
sold in the public market upon issuance, subject to restrictions
under the securities laws applicable to resales by affiliates.
As restrictions on resale end, the market price of our shares of
common stock could drop significantly if the holders of these
restricted shares sell them or are perceived by the market as
intending to sell them. These factors could also make it more
difficult for us to raise additional funds through future
offerings of our shares of common stock or other securities.
We are
controlled by our existing owners and our existing owners will
exert significant influence over us after the completion of this
offering, and their interests may not coincide with
yours.
Immediately following this offering and the application of net
proceeds from this offering, our existing owners will control
approximately % of our common stock
(or % if the underwriters exercise
in full their over-allotment option). Accordingly, our existing
owners will have substantial influence over election of the
members of our board of directors, and thereby have substantial
influence over our management and affairs. In addition, they
will have substantial influence over the outcome of all matters
requiring stockholder approval, including mergers and other
material transactions, and may be able to cause or prevent a
change in the composition of our board of directors or a change
in control of our company that could deprive our stockholders of
an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as
part of a sale of our company and might ultimately affect the
market price of our common stock. We and our existing owners
will also be party to an amended and restated shareholders
agreement, as described below in Certain Relationships and
Related Person Transactions Shareholders
Agreement.
We will be a
controlled company within the meaning of the New
York Stock Exchange rules and we will qualify for and may rely
on exemptions from certain corporate governance
requirements.
Our existing owners will continue to control a majority of the
combined voting power of all classes of our voting stock upon
completion of the offering of our common stock and we will be a
controlled company within the meaning of the New
York Stock Exchange corporate governance standards. Under these
rules, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is
held by an individual, a group or another company is a
controlled company and may elect not to comply with
certain corporate governance requirements of the New York Stock
Exchange, including (1) the requirement that a majority of
the board of directors consist of independent directors,
(2) the requirement that we have a nominating/corporate
governance committee that is composed entirely of independent
directors with a written charter addressing the committees
purpose and responsibilities and (3) the requirement that
we have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of
independent directors with a written charter addressing the
committees purpose and responsibilities. We intend to
elect to rely on these exemptions. As a result, we may not have
a majority of independent directors and our compensation and
nominating and corporate governance committees may not consist
entirely of independent directors. Accordingly, you will not
have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies
that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements
of the New York Stock Exchange.
Our amended
and restated certificate of incorporation will contain a
provision renouncing our interest and expectancy in certain
corporate opportunities identified by the
sponsors.
Our sponsors and their affiliates are in the business of
providing buyout capital and growth capital to developing
companies, and may acquire interests in businesses that directly
or indirectly compete with certain portions of our business. Our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide
for the allocation of certain corporate opportunities between
us, on the one hand, and the sponsors, on the other hand. As set
forth in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation,
neither the sponsors, nor any director, officer, stockholder,
member, manager or employee of the sponsors will have any duty
to refrain from engaging, directly or indirectly, in the same
business activities or similar business activities or lines of
business in which we operate. Therefore, a director or officer
of our company who also serves as a director, officer, member,
manager or employee of the sponsors may pursue certain
24
acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our
business and, as a result, such acquisition opportunities may
not be available to us. These potential conflicts of interest
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations or prospects if attractive
corporate opportunities are allocated by the sponsors to
themselves or their other affiliates instead of to us. The terms
of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation are
more fully described in Description of Capital
Stock Corporate Opportunity.
The
requirements of being a public company may strain our resources
and distract our management.
As a public company, we will be subject to the reporting
requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), and requirements of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Sarbanes-Oxley Act).
These requirements may place a strain on our systems and
resources. The Exchange Act requires that we file annual,
quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and
financial condition. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we
maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and
internal controls over financial reporting. To maintain and
improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures, we will need to commit significant resources, hire
additional staff and provide additional management oversight. We
will be implementing additional procedures and processes for the
purpose of addressing the standards and requirements applicable
to public companies. In addition, sustaining our growth also
will require us to commit additional management, operational and
financial resources to identify new professionals to join our
firm and to maintain appropriate operational and financial
systems to adequately support expansion. These activities may
divert managements attention from other business concerns,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We
expect to incur significant additional annual expenses related
to these steps and, among other things, additional directors and
officers liability insurance, director fees, reporting
requirements, transfer agent fees, hiring additional accounting,
legal and administrative personnel, increased auditing and legal
fees and similar expenses.
We have not
completed an assessment of internal controls over financial
reporting as contemplated by Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and failure to achieve and maintain
effective internal controls over financial reporting in
accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could
have a material adverse effect on our business and common stock
price.
Because currently we do not have comprehensive documentation of
our internal controls and have not yet tested our internal
controls in accordance with Section 404, we cannot conclude
in accordance with Section 404 that we do not have a
material weakness in our internal controls or a combination of
significant deficiencies that could result in the conclusion
that we have a material weakness in our internal controls. If we
are not able to complete our initial assessment of our internal
controls and otherwise implement the requirements of
Section 404 in a timely manner or with adequate compliance,
our independent registered public accounting firm may not be
able to certify as to the adequacy of our internal controls over
financial reporting. We have contracted with a third party to
assist us in performing a risk assessment of our internal
controls over financial reporting, documenting key controls,
determining entity level controls and developing a program for
monitoring, testing and remediating internal control
deficiencies over financial reporting and coordinating with our
external auditors.
Matters impacting our internal controls may cause us to be
unable to report our financial information on a timely basis and
thereby subject us to adverse regulatory consequences, including
sanctions by the SEC or violations of applicable stock exchange
listing rules, and result in a breach of the covenants under our
financing arrangements. There also could be a negative reaction
in the financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in
us and the reliability of our financial statements. Confidence
in the reliability of our financial statements also could suffer
if we or our independent registered public accounting firm were
to report a material weakness in our internal controls over
financial reporting. This could materially adversely affect us
and lead to a decline in the price of our common stock.
Anti-takeover
provisions in our charter documents and applicable state law
might discourage or delay acquisition attempts for us that you
might consider favorable.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws to become effective immediately
prior to the consummation of this offering will contain
provisions that may make the acquisition of our company more
difficult without the approval of our board of directors. Among
other things, these provisions:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
authorize the issuance of undesignated preferred stock, the
terms of which may be established and the shares of which may be
issued without stockholder approval, and which may include super
voting, special approval, dividend, or other rights or
preferences superior to the rights of the holders of common
stock;
|
| |
| |
n
|
prohibit stockholder action by written consent, which requires
all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our
stockholders;
|
25
|
|
|
| |
n
|
provide that the board of directors is expressly authorized to
make, alter, or repeal our bylaws and that our stockholders may
only amend our bylaws with the approval of 80% or more of all of
the outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to
vote; and
|
| |
| |
n
|
establish advance notice requirements for nominations for
elections to our board or for proposing matters that can be
acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.
|
In addition, a Texas regulation requires the approval of the
Texas Consumer Credit Commissioner for the acquisition, directly
or indirectly, of 10% or more of the voting or common stock of a
consumer finance company. The overall effect of this law, and
similar laws in other states, is to make it more difficult to
acquire a consumer finance company than it might be to acquire
control of a nonregulated corporation.
Further, as a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to
provisions of Delaware law, which may impair a takeover attempt
that our stockholders may find beneficial. These anti-takeover
provisions and other provisions under Delaware law could
discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in
control of our company, including actions that our stockholders
may deem advantageous, or negatively affect the trading price of
our common stock. These provisions could also discourage proxy
contests and make it more difficult for you and other
stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and to cause us
to take other corporate actions you desire.
26
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements, which
reflect our current views with respect to, among other things,
our operations and financial performance. You can identify these
forward-looking statements by the use of words such as
outlook, believes, expects,
potential, continues, may,
will, should, seeks,
approximately, predicts,
intends, plans, estimates,
anticipates or the negative version of these words
or other comparable words. These statements include, but are not
limited to, statements about:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
our intention to expand our automobile and furniture purchase
loan portfolios, expand our live check campaigns and continue to
develop our online marketing;
|
| |
| |
n
|
our intention to increase volume at our existing branches, open
new branches and enter new markets in the future;
|
| |
| |
n
|
our plans to develop new products in the future;
|
| |
| |
n
|
our intention to increase the number of customers we serve
through expanding our channels and products;
|
| |
| |
n
|
our ability to maintain the quality of our asset portfolio and
our plans to develop new underwriting and credit control
strategies;
|
| |
| |
n
|
our belief that our capital expenditure requirements and
liquidity needs will be met; and
|
| |
| |
n
|
our expectations about future dividends and our plans to retain
any future earnings.
|
Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and
uncertainties. Accordingly, there are or will be important
factors that could cause actual outcomes or results to differ
materially from those indicated in these statements. We believe
these factors include but are not limited to those described
under Risk Factors and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Factors Affecting Our Results of
Operations. Although we believe that the expectations
reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we
cannot guarantee future events, results, actions, levels of
activity, performance or achievements. These factors should not
be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction
with the other cautionary statements that are included in this
prospectus. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or
review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new
information, future developments or otherwise, except as
required by law.
27
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We estimate that the net proceeds we will receive from this
offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and
estimated offering expenses payable by us, will be approximately
$ million.
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering and cash on
hand as follows:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
to repay $ million of
outstanding borrowings, plus accrued and unpaid interest, under
our senior revolving credit facility;
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
to repay $25.8 million outstanding as of December 31,
2011, plus accrued and unpaid interest, under our mezzanine
debt, which is currently held by certain of our existing
owners; and
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
$1.1 million to make one-time payments to certain of our
existing owners in the aggregate in consideration for the
termination of our advisory and consulting agreements with them
in accordance with their terms upon consummation of this
offering as described under Certain Relationships and
Related Person Transactions Advisory and Consulting
Fees.
|
Any additional net proceeds will be applied to repay additional
outstanding borrowings under our senior revolving credit
facility.
A $1.00 increase in the assumed initial public offering price
per share would increase the net proceeds we will receive from
this offering by $ million,
and an increase of 100,000 shares in the number of shares
offered by us would increase the net proceeds we will receive
from this offering by
$ million, assuming in each
case that all else is constant and after deducting the
underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by
us. A $1.00 decrease in the assumed initial public offering
price per share or a decrease of 1.0 million shares in the
number of shares offered by us would result in equal changes in
the opposite direction.
As of December 31, 2011, we had $25.8 million
aggregate principal amount of mezzanine debt outstanding, which
following our January 2012 amendment matures on
March 31, 2015 and accrues interest at a rate of 15.25% per
annum. The mezzanine debt was refinanced in August 2010, with
the proceeds used to retire our previously existing mezzanine
debt. As of December 31, 2011, we had $206.0 million
aggregate principal amount outstanding under our senior
revolving credit facility, which following our January 2012
amendment matures on January 18, 2015. Borrowings under the
senior revolving credit facility bear interest at a rate equal
to one-month LIBOR (with a LIBOR floor of 1.00%) plus 3.25% as
of December 31, 2011 (which will be reduced by 25 basis
points upon the completion of this offering). For additional
information regarding our liquidity and outstanding
indebtedness, see Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources.
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of our
common stock by the selling stockholders.
28
DIVIDEND
POLICY
Following completion of the offering, we have no current plans
to pay any dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable
future and instead currently intend to retain earnings, if any,
for future operations and expansion and debt repayment.
The declaration, amount and payment of any future dividends on
shares of common stock will be at the sole discretion of our
board of directors. Our board of directors may take into account
general and economic conditions, our financial condition and
results of operations, our available cash and current and
anticipated cash needs, capital requirements, contractual,
legal, tax and regulatory restrictions and implications on the
payment of dividends by us to our stockholders or by our
subsidiaries to us and such other factors as our board of
directors may deem relevant. In addition, our amended and
restated senior revolving credit facility includes a restricted
payment covenant, which restricts our ability to pay dividends
on our common stock.
We did not declare or pay any dividends on our common stock in
2009, 2010 or 2011.
29
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of
December 31, 2011:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
on a historical basis; and
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
on an as adjusted basis to give effect to the offering and the
application of the estimated net proceeds therefrom as described
under Use of Proceeds, as if each had occurred on
December 31, 2011.
|
You should read this table together with the information
contained in this prospectus, including Use of
Proceeds, Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial
Information, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and the historical consolidated financial statements and related
notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
ACTUAL
|
|
|
AS
ADJUSTED(1)
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mezzanine debt
|
|
$
|
25,814
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Senior revolving credit
facility(2)
|
|
|
206,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
231,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary
equity(3):
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.10 per share; 25,000,000 shares
authorized and 9,336,727 shares issued and outstanding,
actual; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized
and shares
issues and outstanding, as adjusted
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in
capital(4)
|
|
|
28,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
earnings(5)
|
|
|
23,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
52,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
296,702
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
A $1.00 increase in the assumed
initial public offering price per share would decrease total
long-term debt by $ million,
would increase additional paid-in capital by
$ million and would increase
total stockholders equity by
$ million, assuming the
number of shares offered by us remains the same and after
deducting the underwriting discount and the estimated offering
expenses payable by us. An increase of 100,000 shares in the
number of shares offered by us would decrease total long-term
debt by $ million, would
increase additional paid-in capital by
$ million, and would increase
total stockholders equity by
$ million, assuming the
initial public offering price remains the same and after
deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering
expenses payable by us. A $1.00 decrease in the assumed initial
public offering price per share or a decrease of 100,000 shares
in the number of shares offered by us would result in equal
changes in the opposite direction.
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Our senior revolving credit
facility is a $255.0 million facility, as described under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources Financing Arrangements
Senior Revolving Credit Facility. We intend to repay a
portion of the borrowings under our senior revolving credit
facility with a portion of the net proceeds from this offering.
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The shareholders agreement among
us, Regional Holdings LLC, the sponsors and the individual
owners provides that the individual owners have the right to put
their stock back to us if an initial public offering does not
occur within five years of the date of the acquisition
transaction, March 21, 2007. We valued this put option at
the original purchase price of $12.0 million. The filing of
the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part
relating to this offering makes it probable that the put option
will not become exercisable.
|
| |
|
(4) |
|
Reflects (i) an adjustment for
the estimated net proceeds to us from the offering less the par
value recorded under common stock and (ii) the
reclassification of temporary equity to additional paid-in
capital as described in footnote 3 above.
|
| |
|
(5) |
|
Reflects the write-off of
unamortized debt issuance costs related to the mezzanine debt.
|
30
DILUTION
If you invest in shares of our common stock, your interest will
be immediately diluted to the extent of the difference between
the initial public offering price per share of common stock and
the pro forma net tangible book value per share of common stock
after this offering. Dilution results from the fact that the per
share offering price of the shares of common stock is
substantially in excess of the pro forma net tangible book value
per share attributable to our existing owners.
Our net tangible book value as of December 31, 2011 was
approximately $49.4 million, or $5.29 per share of common
stock. Net tangible book value represents the amount of total
tangible assets less total liabilities, and net tangible book
value per share of common stock represents net tangible book
value divided by the number of shares of common stock
outstanding.
After giving effect to this offering and the application of the
proceeds therefrom as described in Use of Proceeds,
our pro forma net tangible book value as of December 31,
2011 would have been
$ million, or
$ per share of common stock. This
represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of
$ per share of common stock to our
existing owners and an immediate dilution in net tangible book
value of $ per share of common
stock to investors in this offering.
The following table illustrates this dilution on a per share of
common stock basis:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed initial public offering price per share of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible book value per share of common stock as of
December 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
5.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net tangible book value per share of common stock
attributable to investors in this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per share of common stock
after the offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution in net tangible book value per share of common stock to
investors in this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A $1.00 increase in the assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share of our common stock
would increase our net tangible book value after giving to the
offering by $ million, or by
$ per share of our common stock,
assuming the number of shares offered by us remains the same and
after deducting the underwriting discount and the estimated
offering expenses payable by us. A $1.00 decrease in the assumed
initial public offering price per share would result in equal
changes in the opposite direction.
The following table summarizes, on the same pro forma basis as
of December 31, 2011, the total number of shares of common
stock purchased from us, the total cash consideration paid to us
and the average price per share of common stock paid by our
existing owners and by new investors purchasing shares of common
stock in this offering, assuming the underwriters do not
exercise their over-allotment option.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRICE PER
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES OF COMMON
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
SHARE OF
|
|
|
|
|
STOCK PURCHASED
|
|
|
CONSIDERATION
|
|
|
COMMON
|
|
|
|
|
NUMBER
|
|
|
PERCENTAGE
|
|
|
AMOUNT
|
|
|
PERCENTAGE
|
|
|
STOCK
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Existing owners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Investors in this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
Each $1.00 increase in the assumed offering price of
$ per share would increase total
consideration paid by investors in this offering and total
consideration paid by all stockholders by
$ million, assuming the
number of shares offered by us remains the same and after
deducting the underwriting discount and the estimated offering
expenses payable by us. A $1.00 decrease in the assumed initial
public offering price per share would result in equal changes in
the opposite direction.
The dilution information above is for illustration purposes
only. Our net tangible book value following the consummation of
this offering is subject to adjustment based on the actual
initial public offering price of our shares and other terms of
this offering determined at pricing.
32
UNAUDITED PRO
FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of income for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 presents our
consolidated results of operations giving pro forma effect to
this offering and the application of the estimated net proceeds
therefrom as described under Use of Proceeds, as if
such transactions occurred at January 1, 2011. The
unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2011 presents our consolidated financial
position giving pro forma effect to this offering and the
application of the estimated net proceeds therefrom as described
under Use of Proceeds, as if such transactions
occurred on December 31, 2011. The pro forma adjustments
are based on available information and upon assumptions that our
management believes are reasonable in order to reflect, on a pro
forma basis, the impact of these transactions on our historical
financial information.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information
should be read together with Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and the historical financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information is
included for informational purposes only and does not purport to
reflect our results of operations or financial position had we
operated as a public company during the periods presented. The
unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information should
not be relied upon as being indicative of our results of
operations or financial position had this offering and the
application of the estimated net proceeds therefrom as described
under Use of Proceeds occurred on the dates assumed.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information also
does not project our results of operations or financial position
for any future period or date.
The pro forma adjustments give effect to:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
the application of the proceeds from this offering as described
under Use of Proceeds including:
|
|
|
|
| |
|
the repayment of a portion of our outstanding indebtedness and
the associated reduction in interest expense; and
|
| |
|
the termination of our advisory agreement with the sponsors and
consulting agreements with certain of the individual owners and
the associated termination of consulting and advisory fees, each
in accordance with its terms upon the consummation of this
offering as described under Certain Relationships and
Related Person Transactions, which termination does not
result in any adjustment to our pro forma consolidated balance
sheet;
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
the termination of the right of the individual owners to sell
their stock back to us, which pursuant to the terms of the
shareholders agreement among us, Regional Holdings LLC, the
sponsors and the individual owners terminates upon the
consummation of this offering;
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
the reduction in the interest rate on our senior revolving
credit facility, which will take effect upon the completion of
this offering; and
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
a recalculation of weighted average diluted shares outstanding
using a value per share of $
rather than the value estimated in the historical financial
statements.
|
33
REGIONAL
MANAGEMENT CORP.
UNAUDITED PRO
FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRO FORMA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACTUAL
|
|
|
ADJUSTMENTS
|
|
|
PRO FORMA
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fee income
|
|
$
|
91,286
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
91,286
|
|
|
Insurance income, net
|
|
|
8,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,871
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
5,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
105,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,219
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
17,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,854
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
25,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,462
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
6,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,527
|
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,589
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting and advisory fees
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
(975
|
)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior and other debt
|
|
|
8,306
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mezzanine debt
|
|
|
4,037
|
|
|
|
(4,037
|
)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
12,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
71,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
33,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
12,169
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
21,244
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
9,336,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
9,620,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects the termination of the
advisory agreement we entered into with each of the sponsors and
the consulting agreements we entered into with certain of the
individual owners, pursuant to which we paid the sponsors and
the individual owners an aggregate of $1.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2011. These agreements will be
terminated upon the consummation of this offering in accordance
with their terms upon payment of one-time aggregate termination
fees of $1.1 million.
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Reflects reduction in interest
expense of $ million as a
result of repayment of
$ million in aggregate
principal amount of our senior revolving credit facility, offset
in part by an unused line fee associated with our senior
revolving credit facility of 0.50%. Also reflects a reduction in
the interest rate under our senior revolving credit facility
from one-month LIBOR (with a LIBOR floor of 1.00%) plus 3.25% to
one-month LIBOR (with a LIBOR floor of 1.00%) plus 3.00%, which
will take effect upon the completion of this offering.
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Reflects reduction in interest
expense of $4.0 million as a result of repayment of the
$25.8 million in aggregate principal amount of our
mezzanine debt. Our mezzanine debt accrues interest at a rate of
15.25% per annum.
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Reflects an increase in income
taxes of $ million as a
result of the increase in income before taxes.
|
34
REGIONAL
MANAGEMENT CORP.
UNAUDITED PRO
FORMA CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 2011
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRO FORMA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACTUAL
|
|
|
ADJUSTMENTS
|
|
|
PRO FORMA
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
4,849
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Gross finance receivables
|
|
|
387,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387,494
|
|
|
Less unearned finance charges, insurance premiums and commissions
|
|
|
(80,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance receivables
|
|
|
306,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,594
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(19,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net finance receivables
|
|
|
287,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,294
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
4,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,446
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Repossessed assets at net realizable value
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
7,137
|
|
|
|
|
(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
304,150
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash overdraft
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
7,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,447
|
|
|
Senior revolving credit facility
|
|
|
206,009
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mezzanine debt
|
|
|
25,814
|
|
|
|
(25,814
|
)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
239,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary equity
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
(12,000
|
)(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.10 per share; 25,000,000 shares
authorized, and 9,336,727 shares issued and outstanding,
actual; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized
and shares issued
and outstanding, as adjusted
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
28,150
|
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
23,795
|
|
|
|
|
(2)(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
52,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
304,150
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects the reclassification of
$ million of prepaid expenses
relating to this offering.
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Reflects the write off of
unamortized debt issuance costs related to the mezzanine debt.
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Reflects the repayment of
$ million in aggregate
principal amount under our senior revolving credit facility as
described under Use of Proceeds.
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Reflects the repayment of
$25.8 million in aggregate principal amount of mezzanine
debt as described under Use of Proceeds.
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Reflects the reclassification of
temporary equity to additional paid-in capital. The shareholders
agreement between us, Regional Holdings LLC, the sponsors and
the individual owners provides that the individual owners have
the right to put their stock back to us if an initial public
offering does not occur within five years of the date of
acquisition, March 21, 2007. This right will be terminated
upon the consummation of this offering.
|
|
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Reflects an adjustment to common
stock reflecting the par value for the common stock to be issued
in this offering.
|
|
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Reflects (i) an adjustment for
the estimated net proceeds to us from this offering less the par
value recorded under common stock as described in footnote 6
above and (ii) the reclassification of temporary equity to
additional paid-in capital as described in footnote 5 above.
|
|
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Reflects a payment of
$1.1 million relating to termination of our advisory and
consulting agreements with our existing owners.
|
35
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
The table sets forth our selected historical consolidated
financial and operating data as of the dates and for the periods
indicated, and should be read together with Unaudited Pro
Forma Consolidated Financial Information,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and the historical
consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
We derived the selected historical consolidated statement of
income data for each of the years ended December 31, 2009,
2010 and 2011 and the selected historical consolidated balance
sheet data as of December 31, 2010 and 2011 from our
audited consolidated financial statements, which are included
elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the selected
historical consolidated statement of income data for each of the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 and the selected
historical consolidated balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 from our audited financial
statements, which are not included in this prospectus.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fee income
|
|
$
|
49,478
|
|
|
$
|
58,471
|
|
|
$
|
63,590
|
|
|
$
|
74,218
|
|
|
$
|
91,286
|
|
|
Insurance income, net, and other income
|
|
|
7,144
|
|
|
|
8,271
|
|
|
|
9,224
|
|
|
|
12,614
|
|
|
|
13,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
56,622
|
|
|
|
66,742
|
|
|
|
72,814
|
|
|
|
86,832
|
|
|
|
105,219
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan
losses(2)
|
|
|
13,665
|
|
|
|
17,376
|
|
|
|
19,405
|
|
|
|
16,568
|
|
|
|
17,854
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
22,950
|
|
|
|
27,862
|
|
|
|
29,120
|
|
|
|
33,525
|
|
|
|
40,634
|
|
|
Consulting and advisory fees
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
|
1,644
|
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior and other debt
|
|
|
8,687
|
|
|
|
7,399
|
|
|
|
4,846
|
|
|
|
5,542
|
|
|
|
8,306
|
|
|
Mezzanine debt
|
|
|
5,353
|
|
|
|
3,706
|
|
|
|
3,835
|
|
|
|
4,342
|
|
|
|
4,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
14,040
|
|
|
|
11,105
|
|
|
|
8,681
|
|
|
|
9,884
|
|
|
|
12,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
52,661
|
|
|
|
57,987
|
|
|
|
58,469
|
|
|
|
61,210
|
|
|
|
71,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes and discontinued operations
|
|
|
3,961
|
|
|
|
8,755
|
|
|
|
14,345
|
|
|
|
25,622
|
|
|
|
33,413
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
857
|
|
|
|
2,276
|
|
|
|
4,472
|
|
|
|
9,178
|
|
|
|
12,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
3,104
|
|
|
$
|
6,479
|
|
|
$
|
9,873
|
|
|
$
|
16,444
|
|
|
$
|
21,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
|
$
|
2.28
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per
share(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing basic earnings per
share(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,336,727
|
|
|
|
9,336,727
|
|
|
|
9,336,727
|
|
|
|
9,336,727
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing diluted earnings per
share(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,482,604
|
|
|
|
9,590,564
|
|
|
|
9,669,618
|
|
|
|
9,620,967
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance
receivables(4)
|
|
$
|
167,535
|
|
|
$
|
192,289
|
|
|
$
|
214,909
|
|
|
$
|
247,246
|
|
|
$
|
306,594
|
|
|
Allowance for loan
losses(2)
|
|
|
(13,290
|
)
|
|
|
(15,665
|
)
|
|
|
(18,441
|
)
|
|
|
(18,000
|
)
|
|
|
(19,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net finance
receivables(5)
|
|
$
|
154,245
|
|
|
$
|
176,624
|
|
|
$
|
196,468
|
|
|
$
|
229,246
|
|
|
$
|
287,294
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
168,484
|
|
|
|
192,502
|
|
|
|
214,447
|
|
|
|
241,358
|
|
|
|
304,150
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
159,079
|
|
|
|
176,095
|
|
|
|
187,807
|
|
|
|
197,914
|
|
|
|
239,271
|
|
|
Temporary
equity(6)
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
(2,595
|
)
|
|
|
4,407
|
|
|
|
14,640
|
|
|
|
31,444
|
|
|
|
52,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On March 21, 2007, Palladium
Equity Partners III, L.P. and Parallel 2005 Equity Fund, LP
acquired the majority of our outstanding common stock. In
connection with the acquisition transaction, we issued
$25.0 million of mezzanine debt at an interest rate of
18.375%, plus related fees, which we refinanced in 2007 and
again in 2010 with Palladium Equity Partners III, L.P. and
certain of our individual owners. Additionally, we pay the
sponsors annual advisory fees of $675,000, in the aggregate and
pay certain individual owners annual consulting fees of $450,000
in the aggregate, in each case, plus certain expenses. See
Certain Relationships and Related Person
Transactions Advisory and Consulting Fees. We
intend to repay the mezzanine debt in full with proceeds from
this offering, and we expect to terminate the consulting and
advisory agreements concurrent with this offering.
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
As of January 1, 2010, we
changed our loan loss allowance methodology for small
installment loans to determine the allowance using losses from
the trailing eight months, rather than the trailing nine months,
to more accurately reflect the average life of our small
installment loans. The change from nine to eight months of
average losses reduced the loss allowance for small installment
loans by $1.1 million as of January 1, 2010 and
reduced the provision for loan losses by $451,000 for 2010.
|
36
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Prior to the acquisition
transaction, we had a different capital structure, including a
different number of shares of common stock outstanding.
Accordingly, a comparison of earnings before the acquisition
transaction is not meaningful.
|
| |
|
(4) |
|
Finance receivables equal the total
amount due from the customer, net of unearned finance charges,
insurance premiums and commissions.
|
| |
|
(5) |
|
Net finance receivables equal the
total amount due from the customer, net of unearned finance
charges, insurance premiums and commissions and allowance for
loan losses.
|
| |
|
(6) |
|
The shareholders agreement among
us, Regional Holdings LLC, the sponsors and the individual
owners provides that the individual owners have the right to put
their stock back to us if an initial public offering does not
occur within five years of the date of the acquisition
transaction, March 21, 2007. We valued this put option at
the original purchase price of $12.0 million. The filing of
the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part
relating to this offering makes it probable that the put option
will not become exercisable.
|
37
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read this discussion together with the
consolidated financial statements, related notes and other
financial information included in this prospectus. The following
discussion may contain predictions, estimates and other
forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and
uncertainties, including those discussed under Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus. These risks
could cause our actual results to differ materially from any
future performance suggested below. Accordingly, you should read
Forward-Looking Statements and Risk
Factors.
As a result of a change in our methodology regarding the
allowance for loan losses on January 1, 2010, the
presentation of allowance for loan losses and provisions for
loan losses for dates and periods prior to January 1, 2010
differs from later dates and periods. See Critical
Accounting PoliciesLoan Losses.
Overview
We are a diversified specialty consumer finance company
providing a broad array of loan products primarily to customers
with limited access to consumer credit from banks, thrifts,
credit card companies and other traditional lenders. We began
operations in 1987 with four branches in South Carolina and have
expanded our branch network to 170 locations with over 174,000
active accounts across South Carolina, Texas, North Carolina,
Tennessee, Alabama and Oklahoma as of December 31, 2011.
Each of our loan products is secured, structured on a fixed
rate, fixed term basis with fully amortizing equal monthly
installment payments and is repayable at any time without
penalty. Our loans are sourced through our multiple channel
platform, including in our branches, through direct mail
campaigns, independent and franchise automobile dealerships,
online credit application networks, furniture and appliance
retailers and our consumer website. We operate an integrated
branch model in which all loans, regardless of origination
channel, are serviced and collected through our branch network,
providing us with frequent in-person contact with our customers,
which we believe improves our credit performance and customer
loyalty. Our goal is to consistently and soundly grow our
finance receivables and manage our portfolio risk while
providing our customers with attractive and
easy-to-understand
loan products that serve their varied financial needs.
Our diversified product offerings include:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Small Installment Loans As of
December 31, 2011, we had approximately 137,000 small
installment loans outstanding representing $130.3 million in
finance receivables.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Large Installment Loans As of
December 31, 2011, we had approximately 12,000 large
installment loans outstanding representing $36.9 million in
finance receivables.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Automobile Purchase Loans As of
December 31, 2011, we had approximately 15,000 automobile
purchase loans outstanding representing $128.7 million in
finance receivables.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Furniture and Appliance Purchase Loans As of
December 31, 2011, we had approximately 9,200 furniture and
appliance purchase loans outstanding representing
$10.7 million in finance receivables.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Insurance Products We offer our customers
optional payment protection insurance options relating to many
of our loan products.
|
Our primary sources of revenue are interest and fee income from
our loan products, of which interest and fees relating to
installment loans and automobile purchase loans have
historically been the largest component. In 2009, we introduced
furniture and appliance purchase loans and expanded our
automobile purchase loans to offer loans through online credit
application networks. In addition to interest and fee income
from loans, we derive revenue from insurance products sold to
customers of our direct loan products.
Factors Affecting
Our Results of Operations
Our business is driven by several factors affecting our
revenues, costs and results of operations, including the
following:
Growth in Loan Portfolio. The revenue that we derive
from interest and fees from our loan products is largely driven
by the number of loans that we originate. Average finance
receivables grew 8.3% from $178.2 million in 2008 to
$193.0 million in 2009, grew 11.9% to $216.0 million
in 2010, and grew 22.2% to $264.0 million in 2011. We
originated 47,400, 55,300 and 67,300 new loans during 2009, 2010
and 2011, respectively. We source our loans
38
through our branches and our live check program, as well as
through automobile dealerships and furniture and appliance
retailers that partner with us. Our loans are made exclusively
in geographic markets served by our network of branches.
Increasing the number of branches we operate allows us to
increase the number of loans that we are able to service. We
opened six, 17 and 36 new branches in 2009, 2010 and 2011,
respectively. We opened two AutoCredit Source branches in early
2011 and two additional AutoCredit Source branches in Texas in
January 2012. We have grown more rapidly in Tennessee and
Alabama than in the other states in which we operate. We opened
our first branch in Tennessee in 2007 and our first branch in
Alabama in 2009. As of December 31, 2011, we operated 18
branches with a total of $15.2 million in finance
receivables in Tennessee and 14 branches with a total of
$11.9 million in finance receivables in Alabama.
Product Mix. We offer a number of different loan
products, including small installment loans, large installment
loans, automobile purchase loans and furniture and appliance
purchase loans. We charge different interest rates and fees and
are exposed to different credit risks with respect to the
various types of loans we offer. For example, in recent years,
we have sought to increase our product diversification by
growing our automobile purchase and furniture and appliance
purchase loans, which have lower interest rates and fees than
our small and large installment loans but also have longer
maturities and lower charge-off rates. Our product mix also
varies to some extent by state. For example, small installment
loans make up a smaller percentage of our loan portfolio in
North Carolina than in the other states in which we operate
because the rate structure in North Carolina is more favorable
for larger loans. Small installment loans make up a larger
percentage of our loan portfolio in Texas than our other loan
products because our branches in Texas have historically focused
on small installment loans. However, we expect to diversify our
product mix in Texas in the future. The following table sets
forth the finance receivables for each of our loan products as
of the dates indicated:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% OF
|
|
|
|
|
|
% OF
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCE
|
|
|
TOTAL FINANCE
|
|
|
FINANCE
|
|
|
TOTAL FINANCE
|
|
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Small installment loans
|
|
$
|
117,599
|
|
|
|
47.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
130,257
|
|
|
|
42.5
|
%
|
|
Large installment loans
|
|
|
33,653
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
36,938
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
Automobile purchase loans
|
|
|
93,232
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
%
|
|
|
128,660
|
|
|
|
42.0
|
%
|
|
Furniture and appliance purchase loans
|
|
|
2,762
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
10,739
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
247,246
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
306,594
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Quality. Our results of operations are highly
dependent upon the strength of our asset portfolio. We recorded
$19.4 million of provisions for loan losses during 2009 (or
10.1% as a percentage of average finance receivables),
$16.6 million of provisions for loan losses during 2010 (or
7.7% as a percentage of average finance receivables) and
$17.9 million of provisions for loan losses during 2011 (or
6.8% as a percentage of average finance receivables). The
quality of our asset portfolio is the result of our ability to
enforce sound underwriting standards, maintain diligent
portfolio oversight and respond to changing economic conditions
as we grow our loan portfolio.
Allowance for
Loan Losses
Prior to January 1, 2010, management analyzed losses in the
loan portfolio using two categories of loans: small installment
loans (which included all loans of less than $2,500) and large
loans (which included all other loans). Beginning
January 1, 2010, we have evaluated losses in each of the
four categories of loans in establishing the
39
allowance for loan losses. The following tables provide
reconciliations of the allowance for loan losses by portfolio
segment for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and
2011:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLOWANCE AS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PERCENTAGE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCE
|
|
|
OF FINANCE
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES
|
|
|
|
|
JANUARY 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHARGE-
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
PROVISION
|
|
|
OFFS
|
|
|
RECOVERIES
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Small installment loans
|
|
$
|
4,685
|
|
|
$
|
9,577
|
|
|
$
|
(6,345
|
)
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
|
$
|
8,083
|
|
|
$
|
102,651
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
Large loans
|
|
|
10,980
|
|
|
|
9,828
|
|
|
|
(10,657
|
)
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
10,358
|
|
|
|
112,258
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,665
|
|
|
$
|
19,405
|
|
|
$
|
(17,002
|
)
|
|
$
|
373
|
|
|
$
|
18,441
|
|
|
$
|
214,909
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLOWANCE AS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PERCENTAGE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCE
|
|
|
OF FINANCE
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES
|
|
|
|
|
JANUARY 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHARGE-
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
PROVISION
|
|
|
OFFS
|
|
|
RECOVERIES
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
Small installment loans
|
|
$
|
8,083
|
|
|
$
|
10,664
|
|
|
$
|
(10,068
|
)
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
$
|
8,974
|
|
|
$
|
117,599
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
Large installment loans
|
|
|
2,719
|
|
|
|
2,780
|
|
|
|
(2,588
|
)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
2,972
|
|
|
|
33,653
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
Automobile purchase loans
|
|
|
7,629
|
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
(4,738
|
)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
5,909
|
|
|
|
93,232
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
Furniture and appliance purchase loans
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
2,762
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
18,441
|
|
|
$
|
16,568
|
|
|
$
|
(17,469
|
)
|
|
$
|
460
|
|
|
$
|
18,000
|
|
|
$
|
247,246
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLOWANCE AS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PERCENTAGE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCE
|
|
|
OF FINANCE
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES
|
|
|
|
|
JANUARY 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHARGE-
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
PROVISION
|
|
|
OFFS
|
|
|
RECOVERIES
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
Small installment loans
|
|
$
|
8,974
|
|
|
$
|
9,998
|
|
|
$
|
(10,522
|
)
|
|
$
|
388
|
|
|
$
|
8,838
|
|
|
$
|
130,257
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
Large installment loans
|
|
|
2,972
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
(2,042
|
)
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
2,448
|
|
|
|
36,938
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
Automobile purchase loans
|
|
|
5,909
|
|
|
|
6,014
|
|
|
|
(4,430
|
)
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
7,618
|
|
|
|
128,660
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
Furniture and appliance purchase loans
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
10,739
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
18,000
|
|
|
$
|
17,854
|
|
|
$
|
(17,147
|
)
|
|
$
|
593
|
|
|
$
|
19,300
|
|
|
$
|
306,594
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for
Loan Losses
In evaluating our allowance for loan losses, we currently
separate our portfolio of receivables into four components based
on loan type: small installment, large installment, automobile
purchase, and furniture and appliance purchase. The allowance
for small installment loans is based on the historic loss
percentage computed by using the most recent eight months of
losses applied to the most recent month-end balance of loans.
The allowance for each other loan type is based on the historic
loss percentage computed by using the most recent 12 months
of losses applied to the most recent month-end balance of loans
for each such loan type. We believe, therefore, that the primary
underlying factor driving the provision for loan losses for each
of these loan types is the same: general economic conditions in
the areas in which we conduct business. In addition, gasoline
prices and the market for repossessed automobiles at auction are
an additional underlying factor that we believe influences the
provision for loan losses for automobile purchase loans and, to
a lesser extent, large installment loans. We monitor these
factors
40
and the monthly trend of delinquencies and the slow file (which
consists of all loans one or more days past due) to identify
trends that might require an increased provision and modify the
provision for loan losses accordingly.
Distribution of
Finance Receivables
The following table presents the distribution of our finance
receivables by loan product and segregated by the final maturity
of the loan as of December 31, 2011:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WITHIN ONE
|
|
|
ONE YEAR TO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YEAR
|
|
|
FIVE YEARS
|
|
|
AFTER FIVE YEARS
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Small installment loans
|
|
$
|
69,769
|
|
|
$
|
60,488
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
130,257
|
|
|
Large installment loans
|
|
|
4,571
|
|
|
|
32,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,938
|
|
|
Automobile purchase loans
|
|
|
5,650
|
|
|
|
114,035
|
|
|
|
8,975
|
|
|
|
128,660
|
|
|
Furniture and appliance purchase loans
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
|
|
8,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
82,164
|
|
|
$
|
215,455
|
|
|
$
|
8,975
|
|
|
$
|
306,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the distribution of our finance
receivables by state and segregated by the final maturity of the
loan as of December 31, 2011:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WITHIN ONE
|
|
|
ONE YEAR TO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YEAR
|
|
|
FIVE YEARS
|
|
|
AFTER FIVE YEARS
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
$
|
30,828
|
|
|
$
|
110,106
|
|
|
$
|
1,229
|
|
|
$
|
142,163
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
24,651
|
|
|
|
35,100
|
|
|
|
4,409
|
|
|
|
64,160
|
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
12,833
|
|
|
|
57,091
|
|
|
|
3,211
|
|
|
|
73,135
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
7,607
|
|
|
|
7,490
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
15,155
|
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
6,156
|
|
|
|
5,665
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
11,889
|
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
82,164
|
|
|
$
|
215,455
|
|
|
$
|
8,975
|
|
|
$
|
306,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of our finance receivables have predetermined, or fixed,
interest rates.
Interest Rates. Our costs of funds are affected by
changes in interest rates. In particular, the interest rate that
we pay on our senior revolving credit facility is a floating
rate based on LIBOR. Although we have purchased interest rate
caps to protect a notional amount of $150.0 million of our
outstanding senior revolving credit facility should the
three-month LIBOR exceed 6.0%, our cost of funding will increase
if LIBOR increases. The interest rates that we charge on our
loans are not significantly impacted by changes in market
interest rates.
Efficiency Ratio. One of our key operating metrics
is our efficiency ratio, which is calculated by dividing the sum
of general and administrative expenses by total revenue. Our
efficiency ratio has improved from 40.5% in 2007 to 38.6% in
2011 as a result of our focus on operating efficiencies and
gains in productivity. Following this offering, we expect to
incur new expenses associated with operating as a public company
and potentially increased personnel expenses, which will tend to
adversely affect our efficiency ratio.
Components of
Results of Operations
Interest and
Fee Income
Our interest and fee income consists primarily of interest
earned on outstanding loans. We cease accruing interest on a
loan when the customer is contractually past due 90 days.
Accrual resumes when the customer makes at least one full
payment and the account is less than 90 days contractually
past due.
Loan fees are additional charges to the customer, such as loan
origination fees, acquisition fees and maintenance fees, as
permitted by state law. The fees may or may not be refundable to
the customer in the event of an early payoff depending on state
law. Fees are accreted to income over the life of the loan on
the constant yield method and are included in the
customers truth in lending disclosure. For the periods
prior to January 1, 2010, management evaluated interest and
fee income on an aggregate basis as opposed to by each loan
product as management has done since January 1, 2010.
41
The following table sets forth the composition of our average
finance receivables and average yield for each of our loan
products for the years ended December 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2011:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE FINANCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE FINANCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES
|
|
|
AVERAGE YIELD
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES
|
|
|
AVERAGE YIELD
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Small installment loans
|
|
$
|
96,014
|
|
|
|
47.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
111,440
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
%
|
|
Large installment loans
|
|
|
32,507
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
%
|
|
|
34,371
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
%
|
|
Automobile purchase loans
|
|
|
85,911
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
|
|
112,508
|
|
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
|
Furniture and appliance purchase loans
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
%
|
|
|
5,693
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
216,022
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
264,012
|
|
|
|
34.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
Income
Our insurance income consists of revenue from the sale of
various insurance products and other payment protection options
offered to customers who obtain loans directly from us. We do
not sell insurance to non-borrowers. The type and terms of our
insurance products vary from state to state based on applicable
laws and regulations. We offer optional credit life insurance,
credit accident and health insurance and involuntary
unemployment insurance. We require property insurance on any
personal property securing loans and offer customers the option
of providing proof of such insurance purchased from a third
party (such as homeowners or renters insurance) in lieu of
purchasing property insurance from us. We also require proof of
liability and collision insurance for any vehicles securing
loans, and we obtain collateral insurance on behalf of customers
who permit their other insurance coverage to lapse.
We issue insurance certificates as agents on behalf of an
unaffiliated insurance company and then remit to the
unaffiliated insurance company the premiums we collect (net of
refunds on paid out or renewed loans). The unaffiliated
insurance company cedes life insurance premiums to our
wholly-owned insurance subsidiary, RMC Reinsurance, Ltd.
(RMC Reinsurance), as written and non-life premiums
to RMC Reinsurance as earned. As of December 31, 2011, we
had pledged an $1.3 million letter of credit to the
unaffiliated insurance company to secure payment of life
insurance claims. We maintain a cash reserve for life insurance
claims in an amount determined by the unaffiliated insurance
company. The unaffiliated insurance company maintains the
reserves for non-life claims.
Other
Income
Our other income consists primarily of late charges assessed on
customers who fail to make a payment within a specified number
of days following the due date of the payment (except on direct
loans in North Carolina, which does not permit late charges on
consumer loans). Other income also includes fees for extending
the due date of a loan and returned check charges. Due date
extensions are only available to a customer once every thirteen
months, are available only to customers who are current on their
loans and must be approved by personnel at our headquarters.
Less than 1% of scheduled payments were deferred in 2011.
Provision for
Loan Losses
Provisions for loan losses are charged to income in amounts that
we judge as sufficient to maintain an allowance for loan losses
at an adequate level to provide for losses on the related
finance receivables portfolio. Loan loss experience, contractual
delinquency of finance receivables, the value of underlying
collateral, and managements judgment are factors used in
assessing the overall adequacy of the allowance and the
resulting provision for loan losses. Our provision for loan
losses fluctuates so that we maintain an adequate loan loss
allowance that accurately reflects our estimates of losses in
our loan portfolio. Therefore changes in our charge-off rates
may result in changes to our provision for loan losses. While
management uses the best information available to make its
evaluation, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary
if there are significant changes in economic conditions or
portfolio performance.
As of January 1, 2010, we changed our loan loss allowance
methodology for small installment loans to determine the
allowance using losses from the trailing eight months, rather
than the trailing nine months, to more accurately reflect the
average life of our small installment loans. The change in
accounting estimate from nine to eight months of average losses
reduced the loss allowance for small installment loans by
$1.0 million as of January 1, 2010 and reduced the
provision for loan losses by $0.5 million for 2010.
42
General and
Administrative Expenses
Our general and administrative expenses are comprised of four
categories: personnel, occupancy, advertising and other. We
typically measure our general and administrative expenses as a
percentage of total revenue, which we refer to as our
efficiency ratio.
Our personnel expenses are the largest component of our general
and administrative expenses and consist primarily of the
salaries, bonuses and benefits associated with all of our
branch, field and headquarters employees and related payroll
taxes. As described in Management Compensation
Discussion and Analysis Actions Taken in 2012 and
Anticipated Actions in Connection with the Offering, at
the time of this offering, we intend to grant awards of stock
options to purchase an aggregate of 280,000 shares of our
common stock to our executive officers and directors and stock
options to purchase an aggregate of 30,000 shares of our
common stock to our other employees, each pursuant to the 2011
Stock Plan. Each stock option will have an exercise price equal
to the initial public offering price per share in this offering,
and will vest in five equal annual installments beginning on the
first anniversary of the grant date. We expect to record
deferred stock-based compensation expense equal to the
grant-date fair value of the stock options issued of
$ million, which will be recognized
over the vesting period.
Our occupancy expenses consist primarily of the cost of renting
our branches, all of which are leased, as well as the costs
associated with operating our branches.
Our advertising expenses consist primarily of costs associated
with our live check direct mail campaigns (including postage and
costs associated with selecting recipients), maintaining our web
site as well as telephone directory advertisements and some
local advertising by branches. These costs are expensed as
incurred.
Other expenses consist primarily of various other expenses
including legal, audit, office supplies, credit bureau charges
and postage.
We expect that our general and administrative expenses will
increase as a result of the additional legal, accounting,
insurance and other expenses associated with being a public
company.
Consulting and
Advisory Fees
Consulting and advisory fees consist of amounts payable to the
sponsors and certain former major shareholders, who were members
of our management before our acquisition by the sponsors,
pursuant to the agreements described under Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions
Advisory and Consulting Fees. These agreements will be
terminated upon consummation of this offering.
Interest
Expense
Our interest expense consists primarily of interest payable and
amortization of debt issuance costs in respect of borrowings
under our senior revolving credit facility and our mezzanine
debt. Interest expense also includes costs attributable to the
interest rate caps we enter into to manage our interest rate
risk. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate cap are
reflected in interest expense for the senior and other debt. We
intend to repay the mezzanine debt and a portion of the
borrowings under our senior revolving credit facility with
proceeds from this offering. We entered into an amended and
restated senior revolving credit facility in January 2012. See
Recent Developments Senior Revolving Credit
Facility and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Income
Taxes
Incomes taxes consist primarily of state and federal income
taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax consequences attributable to temporary
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted
tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in
which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered
or settled. The effects of future tax rate changes are
recognized in the period when the enactment of new rates occurs.
43
Results of
Operations
The following table summarizes key components of our results of
operations for the periods indicated both in dollars and as a
percentage of total revenue:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% OF
|
|
|
|
|
|
% OF
|
|
|
|
|
|
% OF
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT
|
|
|
REVENUE
|
|
|
AMOUNT
|
|
|
REVENUE
|
|
|
AMOUNT
|
|
|
REVENUE
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fee income
|
|
$
|
63,590
|
|
|
|
87.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
74,218
|
|
|
|
85.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
91,286
|
|
|
|
86.8
|
%
|
|
Insurance income, net
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
8,252
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
8,871
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,995
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
4,362
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
5,062
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
72,814
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
86,832
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
105,219
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
19,405
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
%
|
|
|
16,568
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
|
17,854
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
General and administrative expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
18,991
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
%
|
|
|
20,630
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
%
|
|
|
25,462
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
%
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
4,538
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
5,165
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
6,527
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,379
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
5,703
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
6,589
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
Consulting and advisory fees
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior and other debt
|
|
|
4,846
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
5,542
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
8,306
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
Mezzanine debt
|
|
|
3,835
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
4,342
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
4,037
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
8,681
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
9,884
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
12,343
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
58,469
|
|
|
|
80.3
|
%
|
|
|
61,210
|
|
|
|
70.5
|
%
|
|
|
71,806
|
|
|
|
68.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
14,345
|
|
|
|
19.7
|
%
|
|
|
25,622
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
%
|
|
|
33,413
|
|
|
|
31.8
|
%
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
4,472
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
9,178
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
12,169
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
9,873
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
16,444
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
21,244
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2011 Compared to Year Ended December 31,
2010
Interest and Fee
Income
Interest and fee income increased $17.1 million, or 23.0%,
to $91.3 million in 2011 from $74.2 million in 2010.
The increase in interest and fee income was due primarily to a
22.2% increase in average finance receivables in 2011 as
compared to 2010 and an increase in the average yield on loans
from 34.4% to 34.6%. The following
44
table sets forth the portions of the increase in interest and
fee income attributable to changes in finance receivables
balance and average yield for each of our products for 2011
compared to 2010:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YEAR ENDED
|
|
|
|
|
DECEMBER 31, 2011 COMPARED TO
|
|
|
|
|
YEAR ENDED
|
|
|
|
|
DECEMBER 31, 2010 INCREASE
|
|
|
|
|
(DECREASE)
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
VOLUME
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
|
NET
|
|
|
|
|
Small installment loans
|
|
|
|
$7,557
|
|
|
$
|
1,614
|
|
|
$
|
9,171
|
|
|
Large installment loans
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
Automobile purchase loans
|
|
|
5,960
|
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
6,313
|
|
|
Furniture and appliance purchase loans
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$14,809
|
|
|
$
|
2,259
|
|
|
$
|
17,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a discussion of the changes by product type:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Small Installment Loans Average small
installment loans outstanding increased $15.4 million in
2011 compared to 2010. The increase in receivables is primarily
attributable to opening 36 new branch locations in 2011 compared
to 17 in 2010. Additionally, the amount of live checks cashed in
2011 was $20.1 million greater than 2010. The average yield
on small installment loans increased by 1.7% from 47.6% in 2010
to 49.3% in 2011.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Large Installment Loans Average large
installment loans outstanding increased $1.9 million in
2011 compared to 2010 while the average yield increased by 1.0%
resulting in an increase in interest income of $836,000.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Automobile Purchase Loans Average automobile
purchase loans outstanding increased $26.6 million in 2011
compared to 2010. The launching of our AutoCredit Source brand
and improvements in our approval process contributed to the
increase. The increase in average loans was combined with a
modest 26 basis point increase in the average yield and
resulted in an increase in revenue of $6.3 million.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Furniture and Appliance Purchase Loans
Average furniture and appliance purchase loans
outstanding increased $4.1 million in 2011 compared to
2010. The increase is attributable to the new relationships we
established with furniture and appliance retailers as well as an
expansion of volume through our existing relationships.
|
Insurance
Income
Insurance income increased $619,000, or 7.5%, to
$8.9 million in 2011 from $8.3 million in 2010.
Although insurance income increased in 2011 as compared to 2010,
insurance income as a percentage of average finance receivables
declined from 3.8% to 3.4%. In 2010, our insurance partner
refunded $570,000 to us. Without this refund, insurance income
in 2010 would have been 3.6% of average finance receivables. We
expect that insurance income as a percentage of average finance
receivables will decline with the growth of our indirect
automobile purchase loan and furniture and appliance purchase
loan businesses as they do not provide us the opportunity to
offer insurance products to customers.
Other
Income
Other income increased $700,000, or 16.0%, to $5.1 million
in 2011 from $4.4 million in 2010. The largest component of
other income is late charges, which increased $353,000, or
12.6%, to $3.2 million in 2011 from $2.8 million in
2010 as a result of our higher average finance receivables in
2011. However, late charges as a percentage of average finance
receivables declined slightly in 2011 as compared to 2010 as a
result of lower loan delinquencies in 2011.
In 2009, we began to offer self-insured Guaranteed Auto
Protection (GAP) to customers in North Carolina and
Alabama. A GAP program is a contractual arrangement whereby we
forgive the insured customers automobile purchase loan if
the automobile is determined to be a total loss by the primary
insurance carrier and insurance proceeds are not sufficient to
pay off the customers loan. In 2011, we recognized
$376,000 of revenue from this product and recognize GAP revenue
over the life of the loan. Losses are recognized in the period
in which they occur.
45
In 2010 and 2011, we recognized $500,000 and $453,000,
respectively, of revenue from the preparation of income tax
returns. We are evaluating this line of business and may decide
to stop tax return preparation in the future.
Provision for
Loan Losses
Our provision for loan losses increased $1.3 million, or
7.8%, to $17.9 million in 2011 from $16.6 million in
2010. The increase in the provision for loan losses in 2011
resulted from the growth in average finance receivables,
particularly the automobile purchase loan portfolio. In 2011,
automobile purchase loans grew by $35.4 million, compared
to a growth of $10.0 million in 2010. Net charge-offs for
2011 were $16.6 million, or 6.3% of average finance
receivables, down from $17.0 million, or 7.9% of average
finance receivables, in 2010.
General and
Administrative Expenses
Our general and administrative expenses, comprising expenses for
personnel, occupancy, advertising and other expenses, increased
$7.1 million, or 21.2%, to $40.6 million during 2011
from $33.5 million in 2010.
Personnel. The largest component of general
and administrative expenses is personnel expense, which
increased $4.8 million, or 23.4%, to $25.5 million in
2011 from $20.6 million for 2010. This increase is
primarily attributable to the addition of 36 branches in 2011.
Personnel costs as a percentage of average finance receivables
increased slightly from 9.5% in 2010 to 9.6% in 2011. Personnel
costs increase with the opening of new branches as we frequently
hire branch managers one to three months in advance of opening
the branch. This time is spent training managers in another
branch prior to opening the branch for which they were hired.
Occupancy. Occupancy expenses increased
$1.4 million, or 26.4%, to $6.5 million in 2011 from
$5.2 million in 2010. The increase in occupancy expenses is
the result of adding additional branches and the associated rent
and utility costs of those branches.
Advertising. Advertising expenses increased
$29,000, or 1.4%, to $2.1 million in 2011 from
$2.0 million in 2010.
Other Expenses. Other expenses increased
$886,000, or 15.5%, to $6.6 million in 2011 from
$5.7 million in 2010. The increase in other expenses was
due primarily to growth in new branches. Other expenses as a
percentage of average finance receivables declined to 2.5% in
2011 from 2.6% in 2010.
Interest
Expense
Interest expense increased $2.5 million, or 24.9%, to
$12.3 million in 2011 from $9.9 million in 2010. The
increase in interest expense was due primarily to increased
interest expense associated with our senior revolving credit
facility and an increase in the unused line fee on our senior
revolving credit facility from 25 to 50 basis points
effective with the August 2010 renewal of our senior revolving
credit facility partially offset by a decrease in interest
expense associated with our mezzanine debt.
Interest expense associated with our senior revolving credit
facility increased $2.8 million in 2011 compared to 2010.
In 2011, the average
30-day LIBOR
rate was 0.29% as compared to 0.34% in 2010. However, in August
2010, we amended our senior revolving credit facility, which
included a new LIBOR floor of 1.00%. In addition, the average
amount outstanding under our senior revolving credit facility
increased by $30.4 million during 2011 as compared to 2010.
The increase in interest expense with respect to our senior
revolving credit facility was also affected by a $252,000
increase in interest expense associated with the change in the
value of our interest rate cap during 2011, which was a smaller
expense than the unfavorable adjustment of $843,000 during 2010.
The rate on the mezzanine debt was 14.25% from January 1,
2010 to August 10, 2010 at which time it increased to the
current rate of 15.25%, which was the rate during 2011. We also
charged off $245,000 of unamortized debt issuance costs in 2010
in connection with the refinancing of the mezzanine debt and
incurred additional expenses in 2010 primarily related to the
refinancing.
We intend to repay the mezzanine debt and a portion of the
borrowings under our senior revolving credit facility in
connection with this offering.
Consulting and
Advisory Fees
The consulting and advisory fees paid to related parties
decreased $258,000, or 20.9%, to $975,000 in 2011 from $1.2
million in 2010. These agreements will be terminated in
connection with this offering.
46
Income
Taxes
Income taxes increased $3.0 million, or 32.6%, to
$12.2 million in 2011 from $9.2 million in 2010. The
increase in income taxes was due to an increase in our net
income before taxes combined with an increase in the tax rate
from 35.8% to 36.4%. The increase in the tax rate is
attributable to increased state income taxes, partially offset
by an increase in the tax benefit from RMC Reinsurance. RMC
Reinsurance is qualified as a small life insurance company for
income tax purposes and, as such, is permitted to exclude a
certain amount of income from taxable income. The tax benefit
attributable to RMC Reinsurance increased in 2011 compared to
2010 because of a $570,000 refund received from our insurance
partner in 2010. The refund increased taxable income in RMC
Reinsurance, reducing the tax benefit in 2010.
Year Ended
December 31, 2010 Compared To Year Ended December 31,
2009
Interest and Fee
Income
Interest and fee income increased $10.6 million, or 16.7%,
to $74.2 million in 2010 from $63.6 million in 2009.
The increase in interest and fee income was due primarily to an
11.9% increase in average finance receivables during the period
and an increase in the average yield on loans from 33.0% to
34.4%. The increase in average finance receivables largely
resulted from our opening of 17 new branches in 2010 as well as
the growth of other recently opened branches. The increase in
average yield is attributable in part to our more rapid growth
in Alabama, Tennessee, Texas and South Carolina, all of which
are states with more favorable interest rate environments.
Insurance
Income
Insurance income increased $3.0 million, or 57.8%, to
$8.3 million in 2010 from $5.2 million in 2009. The
increase in insurance income was due primarily to growth in
loans and higher acceptance of insurance products in connection
with our loans. Insurance income also benefited from a refund of
$570,000 from our insurance partner recognized in January 2010
and a reduction of $147,000 in our credit involuntary
unemployment insurance claims reserve recognized in April 2010
and a further reduction of $85,000 in October 2010. Net of these
items, insurance income increased $2.2 million, or 42.5%.
Insurance income was 3.8% of average finance receivables in 2010
compared to 2.7% in 2009.
Other
Income
Other income increased $367,000, or 9.2%, to $4.4 million
in 2010 from $4.0 million in 2009. The largest component of
other income was late charges, which increased $230,000, or
8.9%, to $2.8 million in 2010 from $2.6 million in
2009. The increase in late charges was attributable to growth in
finance receivables, slightly offset by lower delinquencies in
2010 compared to 2009.
Provision for
Loan Losses
Our provision for loan losses decreased $2.8 million, or
14.6%, to $16.6 million in 2010 from $19.4 million in
2009. The decreased provision for loan losses in 2010 resulted
mainly from lower net charge-offs. Net charge-offs for 2010 were
7.9% of average finance receivables, compared to 8.6% of average
loans in 2009. The decrease is also due to a change in our
determination of the loan loss allowance for small installment
loans. As of January 1, 2010, we changed our loan loss allowance
methodology for small installment loans to determine the
allowance using losses from the trailing eight months, rather
than the trailing nine months, to more accurately reflect the
average life of our small installment loans. The change from
nine to eight months of average losses reduced the loss
allowance for small installment loans by $1.1 million as of
January 1, 2010 and reduced the provision for loan losses by
$451,000 for 2010.
General and
Administrative Expenses
Our general and administrative expenses, comprising expenses for
personnel, occupancy, advertising, and other expenses, increased
$4.4 million, or 15.1%, to $33.5 million in 2010 from
$29.1 million in 2009. Our efficiency ratio improved to
38.6% in 2010 from 40.0% in 2009.
Personnel. Personnel expenses increased
$1.6 million, or 8.6%, to $20.6 million in 2010 from
$19.0 million in 2009. This increase was primarily
attributable to the opening of 17 new stores in 2010. Personnel
costs declined as a percentage of total revenue to 23.8% in 2010
from 26.1% in 2009.
Occupancy. Occupancy expenses increased $627,000, or
13.8%, to $5.2 million in 2010 from $4.5 million in
2009. The increase in occupancy expense was the result of
opening new stores and increases in rent on lease renewals for
certain existing stores.
47
Advertising. Advertising expenses increased
$815,000, or 67.2%, to $2.0 million in 2010 from
$1.2 million in 2009. The increase in advertising expenses
was due primarily to an increase in the size of our live check
campaigns. The volume of our live check distributions increased
81.3% from 2009 to 2010.
Other Expenses. Other expenses increased
$1.3 million, or 30.2%, to $5.7 million in 2010 from
$4.4 million in 2009. The increase in other expenses was
due primarily to growth in our business, as other expenses as a
percentage of total revenue remained relatively constant.
Interest
Expense
Interest expense increased $1.2 million, or 13.9%, to
$9.9 million in 2010 from $8.7 million in 2009. The
increase in interest expense was due primarily to an unfavorable
mark-to-market
adjustment of $843,000 recorded on our interest rate caps in
2010, compared to a favorable adjustment of $280,000 in 2009.
The increase also reflects increased interest expense associated
with our senior revolving credit facility and mezzanine debt.
Interest expense associated with the senior revolving credit
facility increased $696,000, primarily because of an increase in
effective interest rates. We renewed our senior revolving credit
facility in August 2010. The renewed senior revolving credit
facility included a new LIBOR floor of 1.00%, a higher interest
rate spread over LIBOR and a higher fee on the unused amount of
the facility. As a result, the effective rate increased from
3.4% in 2009 to a blended effective rate on the new and old
revolving credit facilities of 3.8% in 2010. In 2009, the
average
one-month
LIBOR was 0.33% and, in 2010, the rate was 0.27%. Interest
expense also increased slightly due to an increase in weighted
average borrowings to $144.1 million in 2010 from
$141.8 million in 2009.
Increased costs relating to our mezzanine debt are primarily due
to refinancing such debt in August 2010. The refinancing
resulted in an increase in interest rate from 14.00% to 15.25%
and the recognition of $246,000 in unamortized debt issuance
costs at the time of renewal.
We intend to repay the mezzanine debt and a portion of the
borrowings under our senior revolving credit facility with
proceeds from this offering.
Consulting and
Advisory Fees
The consulting and advisory fees paid to related parties
decreased $30,000, or 2.4%, to $1.2 million in 2010 from
$1.3 million in 2009. These agreements will be terminated
upon the consummation of this offering.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes increased $4.7 million, or 105.2%, to
$9.2 million in 2010 from $4.5 million in 2009. The
increase in income taxes was due primarily to growth in our
pre-tax income. Additionally, we moved into the 35% bracket
applicable to pre-tax income in excess of $18.3 million.
RMC Reinsurance is qualified as a small life insurance company
for income tax purposes and as such is permitted to exclude a
certain amount of income from taxable income. This income tax
benefit declined on a relative basis in 2010 as our insurance
income exceeded the amount permitted to be excluded.
Quarterly
Information and Seasonality
Our loan volume and corresponding finance receivables follow
seasonal trends. Demand for our loans is typically highest
during the fourth quarter, largely due to holiday spending. Loan
demand has generally been the lowest during the first quarter,
largely due to the timing of income tax refunds. During the
remainder of the year, our loan volume typically grows from
customer loan activity. In addition, we typically generate
higher loan volumes in the second half of the year from our live
check campaigns, which are timed to coincide with seasonal
consumer demand. Consequently, we experience significant
seasonal fluctuations in our operating results and cash needs.
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
We have historically financed, and plan to continue to finance,
the majority of our operating liquidity and capital needs
through a combination of cash flows from operations and
borrowings under our senior revolving credit facility.
As a holding company, almost all of the funds generated from our
operations are earned by our operating subsidiaries. In
addition, our wholly-owned subsidiary RMC Reinsurance is
required to maintain cash reserves against life insurance
policies ceded to it, as determined by the ceding company, and
has also purchased a cash-collateralized letter of credit in
favor of the ceding company. As of December 31, 2011, these
reserve requirements
48
totaled $1.3 million; additionally, we had a reserve for
life insurance claims on our balance sheet of $182,814, as
determined by the third party, unrelated ceding company.
Our primary cash needs relate to funding our lending activities
and, to a lesser extent, capital expenditures relating to
expanding and maintaining our branch locations.
Cash
Flow
A summary of operating, investing and financing activities are
shown in the following table:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
31,232
|
|
|
$
|
41,215
|
|
|
$
|
41,048
|
|
|
Provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(40,711
|
)
|
|
|
(50,599
|
)
|
|
|
(78,933
|
)
|
|
Provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
11,066
|
|
|
|
7,222
|
|
|
|
41,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,587
|
|
|
$
|
(2,162
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased slightly
from 2010 to 2011 despite an increase in net income of $4.8
million. Offsetting the increase in net income was cash spent on
other assets, primarily $2.6 million of expenses related to
this offering.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by
$10.0 million, or 32.0%, to $41.2 million in 2010 from
$31.2 million in 2009. The increases were primarily due to
increased net income.
Investing
Activities
Investing activities consist of finance receivables originated,
net increase in restricted cash, purchase of furniture and
equipment for new and existing branches and the purchase of
interest rate caps.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Finance receivables (originated or purchased) and repaid
|
|
$
|
(39,249
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,346
|
)
|
|
$
|
(75,902
|
)
|
|
Net increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
|
Purchase of furniture and equipment
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
(2,581
|
)
|
|
Purchase of interest rate caps
|
|
|
(800
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
$
|
(40,711
|
)
|
|
$
|
(50,599
|
)
|
|
$
|
(78,933
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities increased
$28.3 million to $78.9 million during 2011 from
$50.6 million in 2010. The increase in cash used in
investing activities was primarily the result of an increase of
$26.6 million in the net origination of finance receivables
from $49.3 million during 2010 to $75.9 million in
2011.
Net cash used in investing activities increased by
$9.9 million, or 24.3%, to $50.6 million in 2010 from
$40.7 million in 2009. The increases were due primarily to
an increase in our finance receivables originated as described
above.
49
Financing
Activities
Financing activities consist of borrowings and payments on our
outstanding indebtedness and the net change in our cash
overdraft.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash overdraft
|
|
$
|
(214
|
)
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
|
$
|
(364
|
)
|
|
Net advances (payments) on senior revolving credit facility
|
|
|
11,674
|
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
|
|
42,708
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of mezzanine debt, related party
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on mezzanine debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,814
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on subordinated debt and other notes, net
|
|
|
(394
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
11,066
|
|
|
$
|
7,222
|
|
|
$
|
41,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of borrowings required to fund loan growth declined
from 2009 to 2010, as illustrated in the following chart. The
increase in 2011 as a percentage of finance receivables resulted
from the growth in new branches.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ADVANCES ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SENIOR REVOLVING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CREDIT FACILITY AS A
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ADVANCES
|
|
PERCENTAGE OF
|
|
|
|
FINANCE
|
|
(PAYMENTS)
|
|
FINANCE
|
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES
|
|
ON SENIOR
|
|
RECEIVABLES
|
|
|
|
ORIGINATED AND
|
|
REVOLVING
|
|
ORIGINATED AND
|
|
PERIOD
|
|
PURCHASED
|
|
CREDIT FACILITY
|
|
PURCHASED
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
39,249
|
|
|
$
|
11,674
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
49,346
|
|
|
$
|
7,015
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
75,902
|
|
|
$
|
42,708
|
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities increased by
$34.7 million to $41.9 million in 2011 from
$7.2 million in 2010. The increase in net cash provided by
financing activities was primarily a result of an increase in
net advances from our senior revolving credit facility to fund a
portion of the increase in finance receivables not covered by
cash from operations.
Net cash provided by financing activities decreased by
$3.8 million, or 34.7%, to $7.2 million in 2010 from
$11.1 million in 2009. The decrease in net cash provided by
financing activities was primarily a result of a decrease in the
net advances from our senior revolving credit facility, due to
our increased cash available from operating activities, which
has allowed us to fund a greater percentage of our loans using
cash on hand.
We intend to repay the mezzanine debt and a portion of the
borrowings under our senior revolving credit facility with
proceeds from this offering.
Financing
Arrangements
Senior Revolving
Credit Facility
In August 2010, we renewed our senior revolving credit facility
with a syndicate of banks. The senior revolving credit facility
provided for up to $225.0 million in availability, with a
borrowing base of 85% of eligible finance receivables. The
senior revolving credit facility had a maturity of
August 25, 2013. Borrowings under the facility bear
interest, payable monthly at rates equal to LIBOR of a maturity
we elected between one month and nine months, with a LIBOR floor
of 1.00%, plus an applicable margin based on our leverage ratio
(which was 3.25% as of December 31, 2011). Alternatively,
we may pay interest at a rate based on the prime rate plus an
applicable margin (which would have been 2.25% as of
December 31, 2011). We also pay an unused line fee of 0.50%
per annum, payable monthly. The senior revolving credit facility
is collateralized by certain of our assets including
substantially all of our finance receivables and equity
interests of substantially all of our subsidiaries. The credit
agreement contains certain restrictive covenants, including
maintenance of specified interest coverage and debt
50
ratios, restrictions on distributions and limitations on other
indebtedness, maintenance of a minimum allowance for loan losses
and certain other restrictions.
In connection with this offering and the acquisition of Alabama
branches, we entered into an amended and restated senior
revolving credit facility in January 2012. The amended and
restated senior revolving credit facility provides for up to
$255.0 million in availability, with a borrowing base of
85% of eligible finance receivables, and matures in January
2015. Upon the completion of this offering, the amended and
restated senior credit facility will reduce the applicable
margin for LIBOR loans from 3.25% to 3.00% and will reduce the
applicable margin for prime rate loans from 2.25% to 2.00%. We
continue to be required to pay an unused line fee of 0.50% per
annum, payable monthly. The amended senior revolving credit
facility will continue to be collateralized by certain of our
assets including substantially all of our finance receivables
and the equity interests of substantially all of our
subsidiaries and will contain certain restrictive covenants,
including maintenance of specified interest coverage and debt
ratios, restrictions on distributions and limitations on other
indebtedness, maintenance of a minimum allowance for loan losses
and certain other restrictions.
Our outstanding debt under the senior revolving credit facility
was $206.0 million at December 31, 2011. At
December 31, 2011, we were in compliance with our debt
covenants.
We have entered into interest rate caps to manage interest rate
risk associated with a notional amount of $150.0 million of
our LIBOR-based borrowings. The interest rate caps have a strike
rate of 6.0% and a maturity of March 4, 2014. When
three-month LIBOR exceeds six percent, the counterparty
reimburses us for the excess over six percent; no payment is
required by us or the counterparty when three-month LIBOR is
below six percent. We intend to repay a portion of the
borrowings under our senior revolving credit facility using a
portion of the net proceeds from this offering.
Mezzanine
Debt
In August 2010, we entered into a $25.8 million mezzanine
loan from a sponsor and three individual owners. The mezzanine
debt, which had a maturity of October 25, 2013, accrues
interest at a rate of 15.25% per annum, of which 2.00% is
payable in kind at our option. The mezzanine debt is secured by
a junior lien on certain of our assets, including the equity
interests of substantially all of our subsidiaries and
substantially all of our finance receivables and is subordinated
to our senior revolving credit facility. The proceeds of this
debt were used to retire the mezzanine debt of the same amount
to an unrelated lender.
The mezzanine loan agreement contains certain restrictive
covenants, including maintenance of a specified interest
coverage ratio, a restriction on distributions, limitations on
additional borrowings, debt ratio, maintenance of a minimum
allowance for loan losses and certain other restrictions.
At December 31, 2011, we were in compliance with all debt
covenants. At December 31, 2011, the aggregate principal
amount of mezzanine debt outstanding was $25.8 million. We
intend to use the proceeds from this offering to repay our
mezzanine debt in full.
In connection with the acquisition of Alabama branches and the
senior revolving credit facility amendment, we amended the
mezzanine debt in January 2012 to provide for a maturity date of
March 31, 2015.
Other Financing
Arrangements
We have a $1,500,000 line of credit, which is secured by a
mortgage on our headquarters, with a commercial bank to
facilitate our cash management program. The interest rate is
prime plus 0.25% with a minimum of 5.00% and interest is payable
monthly. We recently extended the maturity on this line of
credit until January 18, 2015. There are no significant
restrictive covenants associated with this line of credit.
Off Balance Sheet
Arrangements
We are not a party to any off balance sheet arrangements.
51
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2011 and the effect such obligations are
expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future
periods.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LESS THAN 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MORE THAN
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
YEAR
|
|
|
1 - 3 YEARS
|
|
|
3 - 5 YEARS
|
|
|
5 YEARS
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
$
|
231,823
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
231,823
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Interest payments on long-term debt obligations
|
|
|
22,085
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
9,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
4,304
|
|
|
|
2,243
|
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
258,212
|
|
|
$
|
15,243
|
|
|
$
|
242,803
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2011 and the effect such obligations are
expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future
periods after giving effect to this offering and the expected
use of proceeds therefrom.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LESS THAN 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MORE THAN
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
YEAR
|
|
|
1 - 3 YEARS
|
|
|
3 - 5 YEARS
|
|
|
5 YEARS
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Interest payments on long-term debt obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
4,304
|
|
|
|
2,243
|
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of
Inflation
Our results of operations and financial condition are presented
based on historical cost, except for the interest rate cap which
is carried at fair value. While it is difficult to accurately
measure the impact of inflation due to the imprecise nature of
the estimates required, we believe the effects of inflation, if
any, on our results of operations and financial condition have
been immaterial.
Related Party
Transactions
For a description of our related party transactions, see
Certain Relationships and Related Person
Transactions.
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest Rate
Risk
Interest rate risk arises from the possibility that changes in
interest rates will affect our financial statements.
Finance receivables are originated either at prevailing market
rates or at statutory limits. Our loan portfolio turns
approximately 1.2 times per year from cash payments and renewal
of loans. As our automobile purchase loans and furniture and
appliance purchase loans have longer maturities and typically
are not refinanced prior to maturity, the turn of the loan
portfolio may decrease as these loans increase as a percentage
of our portfolio.
At December 31, 2011, our outstanding debt under our senior
revolving credit facility was $206.0 million and interest
on borrowings under this facility was approximately 4.8%
including amortization of debt issuance costs. Because the LIBOR
interest rates are currently below the 1.00% floor provided for
in our senior revolving credit facility, an increase of
100 basis points in the LIBOR interest rate would result in
an increase of less than 100 basis points to our borrowing
costs. Based on a LIBOR rate of 0.375% and the outstanding
balance at December 31, 2011, this increase in LIBOR would
result in an increase of 37.5 basis points to our borrowing
costs and would result in $773,000 of
52
increased interest expense. We entered into an amended and
restated senior revolving credit facility in January 2012. See
Recent DevelopmentsSenior Revolving Credit
Facility and Liquidity and Capital
Resources.
We have entered into interest rate caps to manage interest rate
risk associated with $150.0 million of our LIBOR-based
borrowings. The interest rate caps are based on the three-month
LIBOR contract and reimburse us for the difference when
three-month LIBOR exceeds six percent and have a maturity of
March 4, 2014. The carrying value of the interest rate caps
are adjusted to fair value. For the year ended December 31,
2011, we recorded an unfavorable fair value adjustment of
$252,000 as an increase in interest expense.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations is based upon our consolidated
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States (U.S. GAAP). The preparation of these
financial statements requires estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. Management bases estimates
on historical experience and other assumptions it believes to be
reasonable under the circumstances and evaluates these estimates
on an on-going basis. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Refer to Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements
for the year ended December 31, 2011 included elsewhere in
the prospectus for a complete discussion of our significant
accounting policies. We set forth below those material
accounting policies that we believe are the most critical to an
investors understanding of our financial results and
condition and that involve a higher degree of complexity and
management judgment.
Loan
Losses
Finance receivables are equal to the total amount due from the
customer, net of unearned finance and insurance charges. Net
finance receivables are equal to the total amount due from the
customer, net of unearned finance and insurance charges and
allowance for loan losses.
Provisions for loan losses are charged to income in amounts
sufficient to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses on
our related finance receivables portfolio. Loan loss experience,
contractual delinquency of finance receivables, the value of
underlying collateral and managements judgment are factors
used in assessing the overall adequacy of the allowance and the
resulting provision for loan losses.
Our loans within each loan product are homogenous and it is not
possible to evaluate individual loans. Prior to 2010, management
analyzed losses in the loan portfolio using two categories of
loans: small installment loans (which included all loans of less
than $2,500) and large loans (which included all other loans).
As our loan products have evolved, we have separated our loan
portfolio into four categories: small installment loans, large
installment loans, automobile purchase loans and furniture and
appliance purchase loans. Beginning in 2010, we have evaluated
losses in each of the four categories of loans in establishing
the allowance for loan losses. Management believes that the use
of four categories to analyze losses in the loan portfolio is
more representative of our business beginning in 2010 following
our introduction of furniture and appliance purchase loans and
our expansion of automobile purchase loans to include indirect
automobile purchase loans. We believe four categories will
provide a more accurate analytical framework for determining
appropriate allowance for loan loss levels as our business
develops and we expand our product offerings. We believe this
change in methodology had no impact on our allowance for loan
losses and our financial statements as a whole in 2010 and 2011.
In making an evaluation about the portfolio we consider the
trend of contractual delinquencies and the slow file. The slow
file consists of all loans that are one or more days past due.
We use the number of accounts in the slow file rather than the
dollar amount to prevent masking delinquencies of smaller loans
compared to larger loans. We evaluate delinquencies and the slow
file by each state and by supervision district within states to
identify trends requiring investigation. Historically, loss
rates have been affected by several factors, including the
unemployment rates in the areas in which we operate, the number
of customers filing for bankruptcy protection and the prices
paid for vehicles at automobile auctions. Management considers
each of these factors in establishing the allowance for loan
losses.
53
As of January 1, 2010, we changed our accounting estimate
for our loan loss allowance methodology for small installment
loans to determine the allowance using losses from the trailing
eight months, rather than the trailing nine months, to more
accurately reflect the average life of our small installment
loans. We use eight months rather than a shorter period as it
takes one month for a loan to become delinquent and we believe
using eight months provides an allowance that is more
appropriate and more conservative than one resulting from seven
months of losses. The change in accounting estimate from nine to
eight months of average losses reduced the loss allowance for
small installment loans by $1.1 million as of
January 1, 2010 and reduced the provision for loan losses
by $451,000 for 2010. FASB 250-10-45-18 suggests that changes in
a loan loss allowance due to the ongoing evaluation of an
entitys experience constitutes a change in accounting
estimate. We believe the change from nine to eight months is a
change in accounting estimate, rather than an error in the
financial statements. Changes in estimates are appropriately
reflected in the year of the change in the financial statements.
In 2011, we began evaluating the loans of customers in
Chapter 13 bankruptcy for impairment as troubled debt
restructurings. We have adopted the policy of aggregating loans
with similar risk characteristics for purposes of computing the
amount of impairment. In connection with the adoption of this
practice, we computed the estimated impairment on our
Chapter 13 bankrupt loans in the aggregate by discounting
the projected cash flows at the original contract rates on the
loan using the terms imposed by the bankruptcy court. We applied
this method in the aggregate to each of our four classes of
loans.
Our policy for the accounts of customers in bankruptcy is to
charge off the balance of accounts in a confirmed bankruptcy
under Chapter 7 of the bankruptcy code. For customers in a
Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan, the bankruptcy court reduces
the post-petition interest rate we can charge, as it does for
most creditors. Additionally, if the bankruptcy court converts a
portion of a loan to an unsecured claim, our policy is to charge
off the portion of the unsecured balance that we deem
uncollectible at the time the bankruptcy plan is confirmed. Once
the customer is in a confirmed Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan,
we receive payments with respect to the remaining amount of the
loan at the reduced interest rate from the bankruptcy trustee.
We do not believe that accounts in a confirmed Chapter 13
plan have a higher level of risk than non-bankrupt accounts. If
a customer fails to comply with the terms of the bankruptcy
order, we will petition the trustee to have the customer
dismissed from bankruptcy. Upon dismissal, we restore the
account to the original terms and pursue collection through our
normal collection activities.
Prior to June 30, 2011, in making the computations of the
present value of cash payments to be received on bankrupt
accounts in each product category, we used the weighted average
interest rates and weighted average remaining term based on data
as of June 30, 2011. Management believes that using current
data does not materially change the results that would be
obtained if it had available data for interest rates and
remaining term data as of the applicable periods. Since
June 30, 2011, we have used data for the current quarter.
We fully reserve for all loans at the date that the loan is
contractually delinquent 180 days. We initiate repossession
proceedings only when an account is seriously delinquent, we
have exhausted other means of collection and, in the opinion of
management, the customer is unlikely to make further payments.
Since 2010, we have sold substantially all repossessed vehicles
through public sales conducted by independent automobile auction
organizations, after the required post-possession waiting
period. Losses on the sale of repossessed collateral are charged
to the allowance for loan losses.
Income
Recognition
Interest income is recognized using the interest (actuarial)
method, or constant yield method. Therefore, we recognize
revenue from interest at an equal rate over the term of the
loan. Unearned finance charges on pre-compute contracts are
rebated to customers utilizing the Rule of 78s method. The
difference between income recognized under the constant yield
method and the Rule of 78s method is recognized as an adjustment
to interest income at the time of rebate. Accrual of interest
income on finance receivables is suspended when no payment has
been received for 90 days or more on a contractual basis.
The accrual of income is not resumed until one or more full
contractual monthly payments are received and the account is
less than 90 days contractually delinquent. Interest income
is suspended on finance receivables for which collateral has
been repossessed.
We recognize income on credit insurance products using the
constant yield method over the life of the related loan. Rebates
are computed using the Rule of 78s method and any difference
between the constant yield method and the Rule of 78s is
recognized in income at the time of rebate.
54
We charge a fee to automobile dealers for each loan we purchase
from that dealer. We defer this fee and accrete it to income
using a method that approximates the constant yield method over
the life of the loan.
Charges for late fees are recognized as income when collected.
Insurance
Operations
Insurance operations include revenue and expense from the sale
of optional insurance products to our customers. These optional
products include credit life, credit accident and health,
property insurance and involuntary unemployment insurance. The
premiums and commissions we receive are deferred and amortized
to income over the life of the insurance policy using the
constant yield method.
Stock-Based
Compensation
We have a stock option plan for certain members of management.
We granted options with respect to 441,000 shares in 2007
and 222,000 shares in 2008. We did not grant any options in
2009, 2010 or 2011. We measure compensation cost for stock-based
awards made under this plan at estimated fair value and
recognize compensation expense over the service period for
awards expected to vest. All grants are made at 100% of
estimated fair value at the date of the grant.
The fair value of stock options is determined using the
Black-Scholes valuation model. The Black-Scholes model requires
the input of highly subjective assumptions, including expected
volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected life, changes
to which can materially affect the fair value estimate. In
addition, the estimation of stock-based awards that will
ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual
results or updated estimates differ from current estimates, such
amounts will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the
period estimates are revised.
Since our common stock is not publicly traded the performance of
the common stock of a publicly traded company whose business is
comparable to ours was used to estimate the volatility of our
stock. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury
yield at the date our board of directors approved the option
awards for the period over which the options are exercisable.
Income
Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing
assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
The effects of future tax rate changes are recognized in the
period when the enactment of new rates occurs.
When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some
positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the
taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty
about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the
position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a
tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the
period during which, based on all available evidence, it is more
likely than not that the position will be sustained upon
examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation
processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or
aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the
largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50% likely of
being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing
authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax
positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described
above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits
in the accompanying balance sheet along with any associated
interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing
authorities upon examination. As of December 31, 2011, we
had not taken any tax positions that exceeds the amount
described above.
Interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits
are classified as additional income taxes in the consolidated
statements of income.
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction
and various states. We are generally no longer subject to
U.S. federal income tax examinations for years ended before
2009, or state and local income tax examinations by taxing
authorities before 2008, though we remain subject to examination
in Texas for the 2007 tax year.
The Internal Revenue Service concluded an examination of
RMCs 2007 and 2008 tax returns in early 2010. The amount
assessed by the Internal Revenue Service was not material to the
consolidated financial statements.
55
Recently Issued
Accounting Standards
Accounting
Pronouncements Issued and Adopted
In July 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU)
2010-20,
Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables
and the Allowance for Credit Losses. ASU
2010-20
requires more robust and disaggregated disclosures about the
credit quality of financing receivables and allowances for
credit losses, including disclosure about credit quality
indicators, past due information and modifications of finance
receivables. The disclosures required as of the end of a
reporting period and certain items related to activity during
the year were adopted in 2010, which significantly expanded the
existing disclosure requirements, but did not have any impact on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations or
cash flows. The remaining amendments that require disclosures
about activity that occurs during a reporting period are
effective for periods beginning on or after December 15,
2010, but did not have any impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU
2011-02,
Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditors Determination of
Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring.
ASU 2011-02
clarifies which loan modifications constitute troubled debt
restructurings. It is intended to assist creditors in
determining whether a modification of the terms of a receivable
meets the criteria to be considered a troubled debt
restructuring, both for purposes of recording an impairment loss
and for disclosure of troubled debt restructurings. ASU
2011-02 is
effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after
June 15, 2011, and applies retrospectively to
restructurings occurring on or after the beginning of the fiscal
year of adoption. The adoption of this guidance did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial position, results
of operations, cash flows or disclosures.
Accounting
Pronouncements Issued and Not Yet Adopted
In October 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-26,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing
Insurance Contracts. ASU
2010-26
modifies the definitions of the type of costs incurred by
insurance entities that can be capitalized in the successful
acquisition of new and renewal contracts. ASU
2010-26
requires incremental direct costs of successful contract
acquisition as well as certain costs related to underwriting,
policy issuance and processing, medical and inspection and sales
force contract selling for successful contract acquisition to be
capitalized. These incremental direct costs and other costs are
those that are essential to the contract transaction and would
not have been incurred had the contract transaction not
occurred. This guidance is effective for us for the year
beginning January 1, 2012 and may be applied prospectively
or retrospectively. We do not expect the adoption of this
guidance to have a material impact on our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value
Measurement, which aligns disclosures related to fair value
between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting
Standards. The ASU includes changes to the wording used to
describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring
fair value and changes to the disclosure of information about
fair value measurements. More specifically, the changes clarify
the intent of the FASB regarding the application of existing
fair value measurements and disclosures as well as changing some
particular principles or requirements for measuring fair value
or for disclosing information about fair value measurements.
This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2011. We do not expect the adoption of
this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
56
BUSINESS
Overview
We are a diversified specialty consumer finance company
providing a broad array of loan products primarily to customers
with limited access to consumer credit from banks, thrifts,
credit card companies and other traditional lenders. We began
operations in 1987 with four branches in South Carolina and have
expanded our branch network to 170 locations with over 174,000
active accounts across South Carolina, Texas, North Carolina,
Tennessee, Alabama and Oklahoma as of December 31, 2011.
Each of our loan products is secured, structured on a fixed
rate, fixed term basis with fully amortizing equal monthly
installment payments and is repayable at any time without
penalty. Our loans are sourced through our multiple channel
platform, including in our branches, through direct mail
campaigns, independent and franchise automobile dealerships,
online credit application networks, furniture and appliance
retailers and our consumer website. We operate an integrated
branch model in which all loans, regardless of origination
channel, are serviced and collected through our branch network,
providing us with frequent in-person contact with our customers,
which we believe improves our credit performance and customer
loyalty. Our goal is to consistently and soundly grow our
finance receivables and manage our portfolio risk while
providing our customers with attractive and
easy-to-understand
loan products that serve their varied financial needs.
Our diversified product offerings include:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Small Installment Loans We offer standardized
small installment loans ranging from $300 to $2,500, with terms
of up to 36 months, which are secured by non-essential
household goods. We originate these loans both through our
branches and through mailing live checks to pre-screened
individuals who are able to enter into a loan by depositing
these checks. As of December 31, 2011, we had approximately
137,000 small installment loans outstanding representing
$130.3 million in finance receivables or an average of
approximately $950 per loan. In 2011, interest and fee income
from small installment loans contributed $54.9 million to
our total revenue.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Large Installment Loans We offer large
installment loans through our branches ranging from $2,500 to
$20,000, with terms of between 18 and 60 months, which are
secured by a vehicle in addition to non-essential household
goods. As of December 31, 2011, we had approximately 12,000
large installment loans outstanding representing
$36.9 million in finance receivables or an average of
approximately $3,000 per loan. In 2011, interest and fee income
from large installment loans contributed $9.5 million to
our total revenue.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Automobile Purchase Loans We offer automobile
purchase loans of up to $30,000, generally with terms of between
36 and 72 months, which are secured by the purchased
vehicle. Our automobile purchase loans are offered through a
network of dealers in our geographic footprint, including over
2,000 independent and approximately 740 franchise automobile
dealerships as of December 31, 2011. Our automobile
purchase loans include both direct loans, which are sourced
through a dealership and closed at one of our branches, and
indirect loans, which are originated and closed at a dealership
in our network without the need for the customer to visit one of
our branches. As of December 31, 2011, we had approximately
15,000 automobile purchase loans outstanding representing
$128.7 million in finance receivables or an average of
approximately $8,300 per loan. In 2011, interest and fee income
from automobile purchase loans contributed $25.8 million to
our total revenue.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Furniture and Appliance Purchase Loans We
offer indirect furniture and appliance purchase loans of up to
$7,500, with terms of between six and 48 months, which are
secured by the purchased furniture or appliance. These loans are
offered through a network of approximately 250 furniture and
appliance retailers, including 79 franchise locations of the
largest furniture retailer in the United States. Since launching
this product in November 2009, our portfolio has grown to
approximately 9,200 furniture and appliance purchase loans
outstanding representing $10.7 million in finance
receivables or an average of approximately $1,170 per loan as of
December 31, 2011. In 2011, interest and fee income from
furniture and appliance loans contributed $1.1 million to
our total revenue.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Insurance Products We offer our customers
optional payment protection insurance relating to many of our
loan products.
|
Our revenue has grown from $56.6 million in 2007 to
$105.2 million in 2011, representing a CAGR of 16.8%. Our
net income from continuing operations has grown even more
rapidly from $3.1 million in 2007 to $21.2 million in
57
2011, representing a CAGR of 61.7%. On a pro forma basis,
giving effect to this offering and the application of the
estimated net proceeds therefrom as described under Use of
Proceeds, our net income would have been
$ million in 2011. Our
aggregate finance receivables have grown from
$167.5 million as of December 31, 2007 to
$306.6 million as of December 31, 2011, representing a
CAGR of 16.3%.
Our
Industry
We operate in the consumer finance industry serving the large
and growing population of underbanked and other non-prime
consumers who have limited access to credit from banks, thrifts,
credit card companies and other traditional lenders. According
to the FDIC, there were approximately 43 million adults
living in underbanked households in the United States in
2009. Furthermore, difficult economic conditions in recent years
have resulted in an increase in the number of non-prime
consumers in the United States.
While the number of non-prime consumers in the United States has
grown, the supply of consumer credit to this demographic has
contracted. Following deregulation of the U.S. banking
industry in the 1980s, many banks and finance companies that
traditionally provided small denomination consumer credit
refocused their businesses on larger loans with lower
comparative origination costs and lower charge-off rates.
Tightened credit requirements imposed by banks, thrifts, credit
card companies and other traditional lenders that began during
the recession in 2008 and 2009 further reduced the supply of
consumer credit for the growing number of underbanked and
non-prime individuals. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York, $1.4 trillion in consumer credit, including mortgages,
home equity lines of credit, auto loans, credit cards, student
loans and other forms of consumer credit, was removed from the
credit markets between the second half of 2008 and the fourth
quarter of 2011.
We believe the large and growing number of potential customers
in our target market, combined with the decline in available
consumer credit, provides an attractive market opportunity for
our diversified product offerings installment
lending, automobile purchase lending and furniture and appliance
purchase lending.
Installment Lending. Installment lending to
underbanked and other non-prime consumers is one of the most
highly fragmented sectors of the consumer finance industry. We
believe that installment loans are provided through
approximately 8,000 to 10,000 individually-licensed finance
company branches in the United States. Providers of installment
loans, such as Regional, generally offer loans with longer terms
and lower interest rates than other alternatives available to
underbanked consumers, such as title, payday and pawn lenders.
Automobile Purchase Lending. Automobile
finance comprises one of the largest consumer finance markets in
the United States. According to CNW Research, a market research
company focused on automobile purchase trends, at the end of
2011, there was in excess of $1.8 trillion in automobile
financing outstanding in the United States, including automobile
purchase loans as well as leases, of which 47% related to used
vehicle sales. The automobile purchase loan sector is generally
segmented by the credit characteristics of the borrower.
According to CNW Research, originations by borrowers within the
subprime market averaged $81.4 billion annually over the
past ten years. Automobile purchase loans are typically
initiated or arranged through approximately 68,000 automobile
dealers nationwide who rely on financing to drive their
automobile sales. In recent years, many providers of automobile
financing have substantially curtailed their lending to subprime
borrowers due to significant disruptions in the capital markets
and declines in underlying borrower creditworthiness. As a
result, subprime automobile purchase loan approval rates have
dropped significantly from approximately 69% in early 2007 to
approximately 11% at the end of 2011. This contraction in the
supply of financing presents an attractive opportunity to
provide a large, underserved population of borrowers with
automobile purchase financing.
Furniture and Appliance Purchase Lending. The
furniture and appliance industry represents a large consumer
market with limited financing options for non-prime consumers.
According to the U.S. Department of Commerces Bureau
of Economic Analysis, personal consumption expenditures for
household furniture were estimated at approximately
$83.9 billion for 2011. As measured by Twice, a trade
publication covering the consumer electronics and major
appliance industries, the top 100 consumer electronics retailers
in the United States reported consumer electronic sales of
$128.1 billion in 2010. Most furniture retailers do not
provide their own financing, but instead partner with large
banks and credit card companies who generally limit their
lending activities to prime borrowers. As a result, non-prime
customers often do not qualify for financing from these
traditional lenders. Continued
58
demand for furniture and appliances, combined with constraints
on the availability of credit for non-prime consumers, presents
a growth opportunity for furniture and appliance purchase loans.
Our
Strengths
Integrated
Branch Model Offers Advantages Over Traditional
Lenders
Our branch network, with 170 locations across six states as of
December 31, 2011, serves as the foundation of our multiple
channel platform and the primary point of contact with our over
174,000 active accounts. By integrating underwriting, servicing
and collections at the branch level, our employees are able to
maintain a relationship with our customers throughout the life
of a loan. For loans originated at a branch, underwriting
decisions are typically made by our local branch manager. Our
branch managers combine our sound, company-wide underwriting
standards and flexibility within our guidelines to consider each
customers unique circumstances. This tailored branch-level
underwriting approach allows us to both reject certain bad loans
that would otherwise be approved solely based on a credit report
or automated loan approval system, as well as to selectively
extend loans to customers with prior credit challenges who might
otherwise be denied credit. In addition, all loans, regardless
of origination channel, are serviced and collected through our
branches, which allows us to maintain frequent, in-person
contact with our customers. We believe this frequent-contact,
relationship-driven lending model provides greater insight into
potential payment difficulties and allows us to more effectively
pursue payment solutions, which improves our overall credit
performance. Additionally, with over 70% of monthly payments
made in-person at our branches, we have frequent opportunities
to assess the borrowing needs of our customers and offer new
loan products as their credit profiles evolve.
Multiple
Channel Platform
We offer a diversified range of loan products through our
multiple channel platform, which enables us to efficiently reach
existing and new customers throughout our markets. We began
building our strategically located branch network over
24 years ago and have expanded to 170 branches as of
December 31, 2011. Our automobile purchase loans are
offered through a network of dealers in our geographic
footprint, including over 2,000 independent and approximately
740 franchise auto dealerships as of December 31, 2011. We
have recently begun to expand this channel by offering indirect
automobile purchase loans, which are closed at the dealership
without the need for the customer to visit a branch. In
addition, we have relationships with approximately 250 furniture
and appliance retailers that offer our furniture and appliance
purchase loans in their stores at the point of sale. We have
also further developed and refined our direct mail campaigns,
including pre-screened live check mailings and mailings of
invitations to apply for a loan, which enable us to market our
products to hundreds of thousands of customers on a
cost-effective basis. Finally, we have developed our consumer
website to promote our products and facilitate loan
applications. We believe that our multiple channel platform
provides us with a competitive advantage by giving us broader
access to our existing customers and multiple avenues for
attracting new customers, enabling us to grow our finance
receivables, revenues and earnings while we maintain consistent
credit performance through our integrated branch model.
Attractive
Products for Customers with Limited Access to
Credit
Our flexible loan products, ranging from $300 to $30,000 with
terms between three and 72 months, are competitively
priced, easy to understand and incorporate features designed to
meet the varied financial needs and credit profiles of a broad
array of consumers. This product diversity distinguishes us from
monoline competitors and provides us with the ability to offer
our customers new loan products as their credit profiles evolve,
building customer loyalty.
We believe that the rates on our products are significantly more
attractive than many other credit options available to our
customers, such as payday, pawn or title loans. We also
differentiate ourselves from such alternative financial service
providers by reporting our customers payment performance
to credit bureaus, providing our customers the opportunity to
improve their credit score by establishing a responsible payment
history with us and ultimately gain access to a wider range of
credit options, including our own. We believe this opportunity
for our customers to potentially improve their credit history,
combined with our competitive pricing and terms, distinguish us
in the consumer finance market and provide us with a competitive
advantage.
59
Demonstrated
Organic Growth
We have grown our finance receivables by 83.0% from
$167.5 million at December 31, 2007 to
$306.6 million at December 31, 2011. Our growth has
come both from expanding our branch network and developing new
channels and products.
From 2007 to 2011, we grew our year-end branch count from 96
branches to 170 branches, a CAGR of 15.4%, while only closing
one branch, which was consolidated with another existing branch,
during the same period. We opened or acquired 36 branches in
2011. We have also grown our existing branch revenues. Our
same-store revenue growth rate was 16.3% in 2011, and has
averaged 14.7% annually since 2007. Historically, our branches
have rapidly increased their outstanding finance receivables
during the early years of operations and generally have quickly
achieved profitability.
We have also grown by adding new channels and products, which
are then serviced and collected at the local branch level. We
introduced direct automobile purchase loans in 1998, and have
recently expanded our product offerings to include indirect
automobile purchase loans. Indirect automobile purchase loans
allow customers to obtain a loan at a dealership without
visiting one of our branches. We opened two AutoCredit Source
branches in early 2011 and two additional AutoCredit Source
branches in early 2012, which focus solely on originating,
underwriting and servicing indirect automobile purchase loans.
As of December 31, 2011, we had established over 480
indirect dealer relationships through our AutoCredit Source
branches. Gross loan originations from our live check program
have grown from $52.5 million in 2008 to
$143.1 million in 2011, a CAGR of 39.7%, as we have
increased the volume and sophistication of our live check
marketing campaigns. We also introduced a consumer website
enabling customers to complete a loan application online. Since
the launch of our website in late 2008, we have received more
than 22,500 applications resulting in loans representing
$5.5 million in gross finance receivables.
Consistent
Portfolio Performance
Through over 24 years of experience in the consumer finance
industry, we have established conservative and sound
underwriting and lending practices to carefully manage our
credit exposure as we grow our business, develop new products
and enter new markets. We generally do not make loans to
customers with less than one year with their current employer
and at their current residence, although we also consider
numerous other factors in evaluating a potential customers
creditworthiness, such as unencumbered income and a credit
report detailing the applicants credit history. Our sound
underwriting standards focus on our customers ability to
affordably make loan payments out of their discretionary income
with the value of pledged collateral serving as a credit
enhancement rather than the primary underwriting criterion.
Portfolio performance is improved by our regular in-person
contact with customers at our branches, which helps us to
anticipate repayment problems before they occur, and allows us
to proactively work with customers to develop solutions prior to
default, using repossession only as a last option. In addition,
our centralized management information system enables regular
monitoring of branch portfolio metrics. Our state operations
vice presidents and district supervisors monitor loan
underwriting, delinquencies and charge-offs of each branch in
their respective regions on a daily basis. In addition, the
compensation received by our branch managers and assistant
managers has a significant performance component and is closely
tied to credit quality among other defined performance targets.
We believe our frequent-contact, relationship-driven lending
model, combined with regular monitoring and alignment of
employee incentives, improves our overall credit performance.
Despite the challenges posed by the sharp economic downturn
beginning in 2008, our annual net charge-offs since
January 1, 2007 remained consistent, ranging from 6.3% to
8.6% of our average finance receivables. In 2011, our net
charge-offs as a percentage of average finance receivables were
6.3%. Our loan loss provision as a percentage of total revenue
for 2011 was 17.0%. We believe that our consistent portfolio
performance demonstrates the resiliency of our business model
throughout economic cycles.
Experienced
Management Team
Our executive and senior operations management teams consist of
individuals highly experienced in installment lending and other
consumer finance services. We believe our executive management
teams experience has allowed us to consistently grow our
business while delivering high-quality service to our customers
and carefully managing our credit risk. Our executive management
team has centralized a number of business procedures, such as
marketing and direct mail campaigns, which were formerly
conducted at each branch. This has allowed us to achieve annual
improvements in our expense efficiency ratio and enhanced
control over our individual branches. Our
60
management team has also strengthened our underwriting
procedures and improved the data monitoring that we apply across
our business, including for our direct mail campaigns and our
branch location analysis. Our state operations vice presidents
average more than 23 years of industry experience and more
than 17 years of service at Regional, while our district
supervisors average more than 24 years of industry
experience and more than five years of service with Regional. As
of December 31, 2011, our 170 branch managers had an
average of more than four years of service with Regional and
over three years as branch managers at Regional.
Our
Strategies
Grow Our
Branch Network
We intend to continue growing the revenue and profitability of
our branch network by increasing volume at our existing
branches, opening new branches within our existing geographic
footprint and expanding our operations into new states.
Establishing local contact with our customers through the
expansion of our branch network is key to our frequent-contact,
relationship-driven lending model and is embodied in our
marketing tagline: Your Hometown Credit Source.
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Existing Branches We intend to continue
increasing same-store revenues, which have grown an average of
14.7% per annum for the five years ended December 31, 2011,
by further building relationships in the communities in which we
operate and capitalizing on opportunities to offer our customers
new loan products as their credit profiles evolve. From 2007 to
2011, we opened 74 new branches, and we expect revenues at these
branches will continue to grow faster than our overall
same-store revenue growth rate as these branches mature.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
New Branches We believe there is sufficient
demand for consumer finance services to continue our pattern of
new branch growth and branch acquisitions in the states where we
currently operate, allowing us to capitalize on our existing
infrastructure and experience in these markets. We also analyze
detailed demographic and market data to identify favorable
locations for new branches. Opening new branches allows us to
generate both direct lending at the branches, as well as to
create new origination opportunities by establishing
relationships through the branches with automobile dealerships
and furniture and appliance retailers in the community.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
New States We intend to explore opportunities
for growth in several states outside our existing geographic
footprint that enjoy favorable interest rate and regulatory
environments, such as Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi,
Missouri, New Mexico and Virginia. We do not expect to expand
into states with unfavorable interest rate or regulatory
environments even if those states are otherwise attractive for
our business. In December 2011, we opened our first branch in
Oklahoma. In February 2012, we leased a location for a branch in
New Mexico, and we are applying for a license to operate in
New Mexico.
|
We also believe that the highly fragmented nature of the
consumer finance industry and the evolving competitive and
economic environment provide attractive opportunities for growth
through branch acquisitions although we have no present
agreement or plan concerning any specific acquisition.
Continue to
Expand and Capitalize on Our Diverse Channels and
Products
We intend to continue to expand and capitalize on our multiple
channel platform and broad array of offerings as follows:
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Automobile Purchase Loans We source our
automobile purchase loans through a network of over 2,740
dealers as of December 31, 2011, and have identified over
11,000 additional dealers in our existing geographic footprint.
We have hired dedicated marketing personnel to develop
relationships with these additional dealers to expand our
automobile financing network. We will also seek to capture a
larger percentage of the financing activity of dealers in our
existing network by continuing to improve our relationships with
dealers and our response time for loan applications. We intend
to continue expanding the number of franchise dealer
relationships through our AutoCredit Source branches to grow our
loan portfolio through increased penetration and in January
2012, we opened two AutoCredit Source branches in Texas.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Live Check Program We continue to refine our
screening criteria and tracking for direct mail campaigns, which
we believe has enabled us to improve response rates and credit
performance and allowed us to more than triple the annual number
of live checks that we mailed from 2007 to 2011. In 2011, we
mailed over 1.5 million live checks as well as 251,000
invitations to apply for loans. We intend to continue to
increase our use of live checks to grow our loan portfolio by
adding new customers and increasing volume at our branches,
creating opportunities to offer new loan products to our
existing customers. In addition, we mail
|
61
|
|
|
| |
|
live checks in new markets shortly before opening new branches,
which we believe helps our new branches to more quickly develop
a customer base and build finance receivables. The use of live
checks is not subject to substantial regulation in any of the
states in which we currently operate or any states into which we
expect to expand, but is subject to regulation in other
jurisdictions. We are not aware of any pending legislation in
any of the states in which we operate that would affect our use
of live checks.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Furniture and Appliance Purchase Loans As of
December 31, 2011, we had a network approximately 250
furniture and appliance retail locations through which we offer
our furniture and appliance loans, and have identified over
3,400 additional furniture and appliance retail locations in our
existing geographic footprint. We intend to continue to grow our
network of furniture and appliance retailers by having our
dedicated marketing personnel continue to solicit new retailers,
obtain referrals through relationships with our existing retail
partners, and, to a lesser extent, reach retailers through trade
shows and industry associations. We believe that the furniture
and appliance purchase lending markets are currently
substantially underpenetrated, particularly with respect to
non-prime customers, due to the limited number of lenders
providing financing to these customers and the recent
curtailment of credit provided by prime financing sources.
|
|
|
|
| |
n
|
Online Sourcing We developed a new channel in
late 2008 by offering an online loan application on our consumer
website to serve customers who seek to reach us over the
Internet. We intend to continue to develop and expand our online
marketing efforts and increase traffic to our consumer website
through the use of tools such as search engine optimization and
paid online advertising.
|
We believe the expansion of our channels and products, supported
by the growth of our branch network, will provide us with
opportunities to reach new customers as well as to offer new
loan products to our existing customers as their credit profiles
evolve. We plan to continue to develop and introduce new
products that are responsive to the needs of our customers in
the future.
Continue to
Focus on Sound Underwriting and Credit Control
We intend to continue to leverage our core competencies in sound
underwriting and credit management developed through over
24 years of lending experience as we seek to profitably
grow our share of the consumer finance market. Our philosophy is
to emphasize sound underwriting standards focused on a
customers ability to affordably make loan payments, to
work with customers experiencing payment difficulties and to use
repossession only as a last option. For example, we permit
customers to defer payments or refinance delinquent loans under
certain circumstances although we do not offer customers
experiencing payment difficulties the opportunity to modify
their loans to reduce the amount of principal or interest that
they owe. A deferral extends the due date of the loan by one
month and allows the customer to maintain his or her credit
rating in good standing. Gross finance receivables with respect
of which any payment was deferred for the year ended
December 31, 2011 totaled $51.8 million. In addition
to deferrals, we also allow customers to refinance loans. While
we typically only allow customers to refinance if their loan is
current, we allow customers to refinance delinquent loans on a
limited basis if those customers otherwise satisfy our credit
standards (other than with respect to the delinquency). We
believe that refinancing delinquent loans for certain deserving
customers who have made periodic payments allows us to help
customers to resolve temporary financial setbacks and to repair
or sustain their credit. During 2011, we refinanced only
$4.0 million of delinquent loans, representing
approximately 0.8% of our total loan volume for the year 2011.
As of December 31, 2011, the outstanding gross balance of
such refinancings was only $2.7 million, or less than 1.0%
of gross finance receivables as of such date. In accordance with
this philosophy, we intend to continue to refine our
underwriting standards to assess an individuals
creditworthiness and ability to repay a loan. In recent years,
we have implemented several new programs to continue improving
our underwriting standards and loan collection rates, including
our branch scorecard program that systematically
monitors a range of operating, credit quality and performance
metrics. Our management information system enables us to
regularly review loan volumes, collections and delinquencies. We
believe this central oversight, combined with our branch-level
servicing and collections, improves credit performance. We plan
to continue to develop strategies to further improve our sound
underwriting standards and loan collection rates as we expand.
Our
Products
Small
Installment Loans
We offer small installment loans ranging from $300 to $2,500
through our branches as well as through our live check program.
Our small installment loans are standardized by amount, rate and
maturity to reduce documentation and related processing costs
and to conform with state lending laws. They are payable in
fixed rate, fully amortizing
62
equal monthly installments with terms of up to 36 months,
and are repayable at any time without penalty. In 2011, the
average originated net loan size and term for our small
installment loans were $1,022 and 15 months, respectively.
Our small installment loans include loans originated through our
live check campaigns, which had an average originated net loan
size and term of $1,216 and 16 months for 2011. The
weighted average yield we earned on our portfolio of small
installment loans was 49.3% in 2011. The interest rates, fees
and other charges, maximum principal amounts and maturities for
our small installment loans vary from state to state, depending
upon relevant laws and regulations. See
Government Regulation.
The majority of our small installment loans are made to
customers who visit one of our branches and complete a
standardized credit application. Customers may also complete and
submit a small installment loan application by phone or on our
consumer website before completing the loan in one of our
branches. We carefully evaluate each potential customers
creditworthiness by examining the individuals unencumbered
income, length of current employment, duration of residence and
a credit report detailing the applicants credit history.
Our small installment loan approval process is based on the
customers creditworthiness rather than the value of
collateral pledged. Loan amounts are established based on
underwriting standards designed to allow customers to affordably
make their loan payments out of their discretionary income.
In addition, for small installment loans originated at our
branches, we require our customers to submit a list of their
non-essential household goods and pledge these goods as
collateral. We do not perfect our security interests by filing
UCC financing statements in these goods and instead typically
collect a non-file insurance fee and obtain non-file insurance.
Each of our branches is equipped to perform immediate
background, employment and credit checks, and approve small
installment loan applications promptly while the customer waits.
Our employees verify the applicants employment and credit
histories through telephone checks with employers, other
employment references, supporting documentation, such as
paychecks and earnings summaries, and a variety of third-party
credit reporting agencies.
We also source small installment loans through our live check
mailing campaigns to pre-screened individuals. These campaigns
are often timed to coincide with seasonal demand for loans to
finance vacations,
back-to-school
needs and holiday spending. We also launch live check campaigns
in conjunction with opening new branches to help build an
initial customer base. Customers can cash or deposit live checks
at their convenience thereby agreeing to the terms of the loan
as prominently set forth on the check. Each individual we
solicit for a live check loan has been pre-screened through a
major credit bureau to meet our thorough underwriting criteria.
In addition to screening each potential live check
recipients credit score and bankruptcy history, we also
use a proprietary model that assesses 27 different attributes of
potential recipients. When a customer enters into a loan by
cashing or depositing the live check, our personnel gather
additional contact and other information on the borrower to
assist us in servicing the loan and offering other products to
meet the customers financing needs. Small installment
loans originated through our live check program are secured by
certain non-essential household goods.
The following table sets forth the composition of our finance
receivables for small installment loans by state at December 31
of each year from 2007 through 2011:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AT DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
The following table sets forth the total number of small
installment loans, finance receivables and average per loan for
our small installment loans by state at December 31, 2011:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NUMBER
|
|
|
FINANCE
|
|
|
AVERAGE
|
|
|
|
|
OF LOANS
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES
|
|
|
PER LOAN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
56,866
|
|
|
$
|
51,751
|
|
|
$
|
910
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
42,143
|
|
|
|
37,825
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
22,047
|
|
|
|
27,031
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
9,034
|
|
|
|
7,442
|
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
|
|
6,117
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
137,437
|
|
|
$
|
130,257
|
|
|
$
|
948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large
Installment Loans
We also offer large installment loans through our branches in
amounts ranging from $2,500 to $20,000. Our large installment
loans are payable in fixed rate, fully amortizing equal monthly
installments with terms of 18 to 60 months, and are
repayable at any time without penalty. We require our large
installment loans to be secured by a vehicle, which may be an
automobile, motorcycle, boat or all-terrain vehicle, as well as
certain non-essential household goods. In 2011, our average
originated net loan size and term for large installment loans
were $3,065 and 27 months, respectively. The weighted
average yield we earned on our portfolio of large installment
loans was 27.6% for 2011.
Potential customers apply for a large installment loan by
visiting one of our branches, where they are interviewed by one
of our employees who evaluates the customers
creditworthiness, including a review of a credit bureau report,
before extending a loan. As with our small installment loans,
large installment loans are made to individuals based on the
customers unencumbered income, length of current
employment, duration of residence and prior credit experience
and credit report history. Loan amounts are established based on
underwriting standards designed to allow customers to affordably
make their loan payments out of their discretionary income. Our
branches perform the same immediate verifications that we
perform for small installment loans in order to approve large
installment loan applications promptly.
Our branch employees will perform an in-person appraisal of the
collateral pledged for a large installment loan using our
multipoint checklist and will use one or more third-party
valuation sources, such as the National Automobile Dealers
Association (NADA) Appraisal Guides, to determine an estimate of
the collaterals value. Regardless of the value of the
vehicle, we will not lend in excess of our assessment of the
borrowers ability to repay.
We perfect all first-lien security interests in each pledged
vehicle by retaining the title to the collateral in our files
until the loan is fully repaid. In certain states, we offer
large installment loans secured by second-lien security
interests on vehicles, in which case we instead seek to perfect
our security interest by recording our lien on the title. We
work with customers experiencing payment difficulties to help
them to find a solution and view repossession only as a last
option. In the event we do elect to repossess a vehicle, we use
third-party vendors. We then sell our repossessed vehicle
inventory through public sales conducted by independent
automobile auction organizations after the required
post-repossession waiting period. Any excess proceeds from the
sale of the collateral are returned to the customer.
64
The following table sets forth the composition of our finance
receivables for large installment loans by state at December 31
of each year from 2007 through 2011:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AT DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the total number of large
installment loans, finance receivables and average per loan for
our large installment loans by state at December 31, 2011:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL NUMBER
|
|
|
FINANCE
|
|
|
AVERAGE
|
|
|
|
|
OF LOANS
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES
|
|
|
PER LOAN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
5,877
|
|
|
$
|
18,173
|
|
|
$
|
3,092
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
|
|
9,951
|
|
|
|
3,088
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
3,028
|
|
|
|
2,937
|
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
|
2,641
|
|
|
|
2,581
|
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12,410
|
|
|
$
|
36,938
|
|
|
$
|
2,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile
Purchase Loans
Our automobile purchase loans are offered through a network of
dealers in our geographic footprint, including over 2,000
independent and approximately 740 franchise automobile
dealerships as of December 31, 2011. These loans are
offered in amounts up to $30,000 and are secured by the financed
vehicle. They are payable in fixed rate, fully amortizing equal
monthly installments with terms generally of 36 to
72 months, and are repayable at any time without penalty.
In 2011, our average originated net loan size and term for
automobile purchase loans were $11,690 and 54 months,
respectively. The weighted average yield we earned on our
portfolio of automobile purchase loans was 22.9% for 2011.
Direct Automobile Purchase Loans. We have business
relationships with dealerships throughout our geographic
footprint that offer our loans to their customers in need of
financing. These dealers will contact one of our local branches
to initiate a loan application when they have identified a
customer that meets our written underwriting standards.
Applications for direct automobile purchase loans may also be
received through one of the online credit application networks
in which we participate, such as DealerTrack and RouteOne. We
will review the application and requested loan terms and propose
modifications, if necessary, before providing initial approval
inviting the dealer and the customer to come to a local branch
to close the loan. Our branch employees interview the customer
to verify information in the dealers credit application,
obtain a credit bureau report on the customer and inspect the
vehicle to confirm that the customers order accurately
describes the vehicle before closing the loan. Our branch
employees will perform the same in-person appraisal of the
pledged vehicle that they would perform for a vehicle securing a
large installment loan.
Indirect Automobile Purchase Loans. Since late 2010,
we have also offered indirect automobile purchase loans, which
allow customers and dealers to complete a loan at the dealership
without the need to visit one of our branches. We only offer
indirect loans through larger franchise dealers within our
geographic footprint. These larger franchise dealers collect
credit applications from their customers and either forward the
applications to us specifically or, more commonly, submit the
applications to numerous potential lenders through online credit
application networks, such as DealerTrack and RouteOne. In early
2011, we introduced AutoCredit Source branches in the
Dallas-Ft. Worth, Texas and Charlotte, North Carolina
metropolitan areas, which focus solely on originating,
65
underwriting and servicing indirect automobile purchase loans.
Since opening these two new AutoCredit Source branches, we have
already established over 480 indirect dealer relationships
through these branches. We opened two additional AutoCredit
Source branches in Texas in January 2012. In our other markets,
indirect automobile purchase loan applications are processed by
our centralized underwriting department. Once the loan is
approved, the dealer closes the loan on a standardized retail
installment sales contract at the point of sale. Subsequently,
we purchase the loan and then service and collect on it locally
either through an AutoCredit Source branch or our nearest branch.
Automobile purchase loans are made to individuals based on the
customers unencumbered income, length of current
employment, duration of residence and prior credit experience
and credit report history. Loan amounts are established based on
underwriting standards designed to allow customers to affordably
make their loan payments out of their discretionary income. We
perfect our collateral by recording our lien and retaining the
vehicles title. Our underwriting standards, however, are
primarily based on the creditworthiness of the borrower and we
view repossession only as a last option.
The following table sets forth the composition of our finance
receivables for automobile purchase loans by state at
December 31 of each year from 2007 through 2011:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AT DECEMBER 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the total number of automobile
purchase loans, finance receivables and average per loan for our
automobile purchase loans by state at December 31, 2011:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL NUMBER
|
|
|
FINANCE
|
|
|
AVERAGE
|
|
|
|
|
OF LOANS
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES
|
|
|
PER LOAN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
8,861
|
|
|
$
|
70,785
|
|
|
$
|
7,988
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
16,985
|
|
|
|
11,248
|
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
4,241
|
|
|
|
33,406
|
|
|
|
7,877
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
4,644
|
|
|
|
9,018
|
|
|
Alabama
|
|
| |