United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 2007 NY Rulings > NY N018088 - NY N018249 > NY N018148

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
NY N018148

October 12, 2007



TARIFF NO.: 9503.00.0080

MGA Entertainment
16340 Roscoe Blvd #200
Van Nuys, CA 91406

RE: The tariff classification of Bratz TM Hair Style Yasmin, Item #374466 from China

Dear Ms. Cooper-Martin:

In your letter dated October 2, 2007, you requested a tariff classification ruling.

The sample submitted, Bratz TM Hair Style Yasmin, is identified as item number 374466. The toy set consists of a Bratz Fashion Doll, a paddle brush, a sponge hair applicator, 2 hair highlight tubes, hair glitter mascara, a spray bottle, 2 hair clips and accessories. The doll measures approximately 8 1/2 inches in height. The item is designed so that the doll’s hair can be colored and styled by a child. The highlight tubes can also used on a child’s hair. The item is packaged in a cardboard box with a window display and is intended as a toy for a child 6 years of age and older.

The applicable subheading for the Bratz TM Hair Style Yasmin will be 9503.00.0080, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for Tricycles, scooters, pedal cars other toys parts and accessories thereofOther. The rate of duty will be Free.

Duty rates are provided for your convenience and are subject to change. The text of the most recent HTSUS and the accompanying duty rates are provided on World Wide Web at http://www.usitc.gov/tata/hts/.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Wayne Kessler at 646-733-3025.


Robert B. Swierupski

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: