United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 2006 NY Rulings > NY M80230 - NY M80277 > NY M80271

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
NY M80271

March 17, 2006

CLA-2-60:RR:NC:TA:352 M80271


TARIFF NO.: 6005.33.0010

Mr. John Nagel
Sara Lee Branded Apparel
1000 East Hanes Mill Road, 4th Floor
Winston-Salem, NC 27105

RE: The tariff classification of a nylon/rayon blend raschel knit fabric from Columbia.

Dear Mr. Nagel:

In your letter dated March 6, 2005 you requested a tariff classification ruling. The sample is being returned as requested.

The submitted sample, designated as style LW1095, is an open-work warp knit fabric composed of 64.1% nylon and 35.9% rayon. This raschel knit fabric is characterized by an inwrought design featuring a floral motif. The product contains yarns of different colors. Weighing approximately 68 g/m2, this item will be imported in 335 centimeter widths.

The applicable subheading for the warp knit fabric designated as style LW1095 will be 6005.33.0010, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for warp knit fabrics (including those made on galloon knitting machines), other than those of headings 6001 to 6004, of synthetic fibers, of yarns of different colors, open-work fabrics. The rate of duty will be 10 percent ad valorem.

Duty rates are provided for your convenience and are subject to change. The text of the most recent HTSUS and the accompanying duty rates are provided on World Wide Web at http://www.usitc.gov/tata/hts/.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Alan Tytelman at 646-733-3045.


Robert B. Swierupski

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: