United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 2003 NY Rulings > NY J84546 - NY J84594 > NY J84573

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
NY J84573

May 23, 2003

CLA-2-63:RR:NC:TA:351 J84573


TARIFF NO.: 6307.90.9889

Ms. Susan D. Klingbeil
496 W. Germantown Pike
Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462

RE: The tariff classification of an “Effective Desk Pad” from Czech Republic.

Dear Ms. Klingbeil:

In your letter dated May 6, 2003, you requested a tariff classification ruling.

The sample submitted is an “Effective Desk Pad,” article number 40062128. It is constructed of paperboard and a polyurethane foam base covered on one side with woven textile fabric. The other side is covered with a wool fabric. It features at each end two open pockets made of mesh woven fabrics.

The applicable subheading for the “Effective Desk Pad” will be 6307.90.9889, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for other made up articles . . . Other. The duty rate will be 7 percent ad valorem.

Articles classifiable under subheading 6307.90.9889, HTS, which are products of Czech Republic may be entitled to duty free treatment under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) upon compliance with all applicable regulations. The GSP is subject to modification and periodic suspension, which may affect the status of your transaction at the time of entry for consumption or withdrawal from warehouse. To obtain current information on GSP, check our Web site at www.cbp.gov and search for the term "GSP".

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Mitchel Bayer at 646-733-3102.


Robert B. Swierupski

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: