United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 2002 NY Rulings > NY H88372 - NY H88416 > NY H88396

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
NY H88396

March 11, 2002

CLA-2-61:RR:NC:TA:359 H88396


TARIFF NO.: 6110.30.3055

Mr. Leo Sarmiento
Fritz Company
150-20 132nd Avenue
Jamaica, NY 11434

RE: The tariff classification of a woman’s cardigan from Canada

Dear Mr. Sarmiento:

In your letter dated February 28, 2002, on behalf of Jay-Gur International, 95 Gince, St. Laurent, Quebec, Canada, you requested a tariff classification ruling.

The submitted sample, style AW42D259, is a woman’s cardigan that is constructed from 100% polyester, knit fabric. The outer surface of the garment measures more than 9 stitches per 2 centimeters in the horizontal direction. The cardigan features a hood, long sleeves with elastic cuffs, a full front opening with a zipper closure, 2 front vertical inset pockets at the waist, and a hemmed bottom. Piping adorns the hood, the armhole area, and the front and back panels.

Your sample is being returned as requested.

The applicable subheading for the cardigan will be 6110.30.3055, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for sweatersand similar articles, knitted: of man made fibers: otherother: women’s. The general rate of duty will be 32.4% ad valorem.

The cardigan falls within textile category designation 639. Based upon international textile trade agreements products of Canada are not subject to quota nor the requirement of a visa.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Mike Crowley at 646-733-3049.


Robert B. Swierupski

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: