United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 2000 NY Rulings > NY G83065 - NY G83117 > NY G83106

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
NY G83106

October 16, 2000

CLA-2-42:RR:NC:TA:341 G83106


TARIFF NO.: 4202.92.4500

Ms. Barbara Y. Wierbicki
Tompkins & Davidson, LLP
One Astor Plaza
1515 Broadway
New York, NY 10036-8901

RE: The tariff classification of a toiletry bag from China.

Dear Ms. Wierbicki:

In your letter dated October 6, 2000, on behalf of Avon Products, Inc., you requested a tariff classification ruling for a toiletry bag.

The sample submitted is identified as “Beyond Color Relaunch GWP” – #PP100553. The item is a toiletry bag designed to contain toiletries and other small personal effects during travel. It is manufactured with an exterior surface of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) sheeting with a textile interior lining. The interior of the bag features elasticized wall pockets and the interior center seam incorporates a hook and loop strip to which is adhered a mesh pouch with corresponding strip and a full zipper closure. The articles measures approximately 7 ½”(W) x 5” (H) x 2 ¼”(D). The bag is secured by means of a zippered closure spanning three sides of the bag. Your sample is being returned as requested.

The applicable subheading for #PP100553 will be 4202.92.4500, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for travel, sports and similar bags, with outer surface of sheeting of plastic, other. The rate of duty will be 20 percent ad valorem.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Kevin Gorman at 212-637-7091.


Robert B. Swierupski

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: