United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1999 NY Rulings > NY E84301 - NY E84352 > NY E84306

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

July 28, 1999

CLA-2-63:RR:NC:TA:352 E84306


TARIFF NO.: 6307.90.9989

Ms. Pattie Zimmerman
Charles M. Schayer & Co.
15210 32nd Ave. South Ste. D
Seattle, WA 98188

RE: The tariff classification of a “Half Shooting Vest” from China.

Dear Ms. Zimmerman:

In your letter dated June 24, 1999, on behalf of Cabela’s Inc., Sidney, Nebraska, you requested a tariff classification ruling. The sample is being returned as requested.

The sample submitted is a “Half Shooting Vest”, item number MO6-VT-155. The article is design to be worn around the waist. It is constructed of two fabric panels. One panel is made of open work nylon knit fabric and the other panel is of nylon canvas fabric. The canvas panel is sewn over the open work nylon knit fabric panel to create pockets. The front features four pockets, two pockets are held closed with a spring-type metal bar and the other two are open pockets. The back features one pocket measuring the full width and length of the article. This pocket has an opening on each side with an elastic top. Inserted through the top edge of the article is a removable web fabric belt with a plastic buckle.

The applicable subheading for the “Half Shooting Vest” will be 6307.90.9989, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for other made up articles . . . Other. The rate of duty will be 7 percent ad valorem.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Alan Tytelman at 212-637-7092.


Robert B. Swierupski

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: