United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1998 NY Rulings > NY 887267 - NY 887398 > NY 887304

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
NY 887304





June 21, 1993

CLA-2-90:S:N:N3:114 887304

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

TARIFF NO.: 9001.90.9000

Mr. G. L. Clarke
F. Wiggins (Meakin)
160 Whyteleafe Road
Caterham
Surrey
United Kingdom
CR3 5ED

RE: The tariff classification of Mica Light Retarders from the United Kingdom

Dear Mr. Clarke:

In your letter dated May 10, 1993 you requested a tariff classification ruling.

Mica light retarders are typically 1 inch in diameter (25mm), but are also supplied at 19mm, 12.5mm, 10mm, and 50mm diameters. Mica light retarders are made in two ways. The mica light retarders may be sandwiched between optical glass cover plates which are ground and polished to an optical standard. In other cases because of the requirements of the end user, the mica light retarders are unsupported by optical glass cover plates.

The function of the mica light retarders is to convert the plane of polarized light to circular or elliptical light. They do not filter light. They function in the visible and the near infrared wavelength ranges. The applications for mica light retarders are in laser optics and electro- optical systems such as spectroscopy, photoelastic stress research, and holographics.

The applicable subheading for the mica light retarders will be 9001.90.9000, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides for lenses, prisms, mirrors and other optical elements, of any material, unmounted, other than such elements of glass not optically worked; other. The rate of duty will be 8.4 percent ad valorem.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction.

Sincerely,

Jean F. Maguire
Area Director

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: