United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1998 HQ Rulings > HQ 960803 - HQ 960950 > HQ 960933

Previous Ruling Next Ruling
HQ 960933




September 30, 1997

CLA-2 RR:TC:TE 960933 GGD

CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION

TARIFF NO.: 9403.90.6000

Michael Manzi, Esquire
59 Jackson Street
Lawrence, Massachusetts 01840-1624

Dear Mr. Manzi:

In Headquarters Ruling Letter (HQ) 088553, issued November 6, 1991, you were advised on behalf of your client, Tots in Mind, Inc., that HQ 087844, dated November 30, 1990, was affirmed. Both rulings had concerned the classification of a crib safety tent in subheading 6304.91.0040, HTSUSA, textile category 666, the provision for "Other furnishing articles, excluding those of heading 9404: Other: Knitted or crocheted, Of man-made fibers."

In Bauerhin Technologies Limited Partnership and John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United States (hereinafter Bauerhin), 914 F. Supp. 554, Slip Op. 95-206 (1995 Ct. Intl. Trade), aff'd, Slip Op. 96-1275 and Slip Op. 96-1276, decided April 2, 1997, the Court of International Trade (CIT) held, and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed, that textile canopies designed for use with child automobile safety seats were classified as parts of the car seats for which they were designed under heading 9401, HTSUS.

This letter is to advise you that, in HQ 959262, issued May 6, 1997, copy attached, this office followed the rationale of the CIT and CAFC in Bauerhin, and classified similar merchandise - a "Cozy Crib Tent" - in subheading 9403.90.6000, HTSUSA, the provision for "Other furniture and parts thereof: Parts: Other: Of textile material, except cotton," with a general column one rate of duty of 2.8 percent ad valorem. We find that the crib -2-
safety tent subject to HQ 087844 and HQ 088553, is classified in subheading 9403.90.6000, HTSUSA, and by operation of law, the Bauerhin case revoked the two referenced rulings.

Under the Customs Modernization provisions of the NAFTA Implementation Act, it is the responsibility of the importer to classify and appraise merchandise. The U.S. Customs Service, although under no obligation to inform you of the foregoing, is in the spirit of informed compliance notifying you of the consequences of the Bauerhin case. This letter and attachment should be brought to the attention of Customs when entry is made for your merchandise, either by referencing this ruling letter and attachment or by providing a copy.

Sincerely,

John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: