United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1990 HQ Rulings > HQ 0085626 - HQ 0085755 > HQ 0085691

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

HQ 085691

April 18, 1990

CLA-2 CO:R:C:G 085691 CMR


TARIFF NO.: 9817.00.9600

William J. Maloney, Esq.
Rode & Qualey
295 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10017

RE: Classification of an adult brief--Revocation of HRL 085016 of September 19, 1989

Dear Mr. Maloney:

This ruling is in response to your request, on behalf of Absorb-Plus Textiles Inc., for reconsideration of HRL 085016 in which an adult brief was classified under the provision for women's or girls' other garments of man-made fibers in subheading 6211.43.0090, HTSUSA.


The article at issue in HRL 085016 was the Z-ton Brief, style 2105. A sample has been submitted for our review.

The brief is a reusable, absorbent, textile pant for individuals suffering from incontinence. The brief is made with an outer shell of knit polyester fabric with a visible green vinyl covering. The interlining of the brief is made of 60 percent polyester and 40 percent rayon material. The lining is a woven fabric of 80 percent cotton and 20 percent polyester.

The brief has a partially elasticized waistband and fully elasticized leg openings. The brief is secured for wear by metal snaps which can be adjusted for fit. When fitted and worn properly the outer shell fabric, known as the Kool Knit barrier, prevents leakage. The brief is suitable for wear by men and women and is available in various sizes.

The brief is sold principally to intermediate care facilities, nursing homes and chronic care facilities.


Is the subject brief classifiable as an article specially designed or adapted for the use or benefit of physically or mentally handicapped persons other than the blind under subheading 9817.00.9600, HTSUSA?


Classification of goods under the HTSUSA is governed by the General Rules of Interpretation (GRIs). GRI 1 provides that "classification shall be determined according to the terms of the headings and any relative section or chapter notes, provided such headings or notes do not otherwise require, according to [the remaining GRIs taken in order]."

Subheading 9817.00.9600, HTSUSA, provides for articles specially designed or adapted for the use or benefit of the blind or other physically or mentally handicapped persons, other. Note 4 to Subchapter XVII, Chapter 98, provides the following:

(a) For purposes of subheadings 9817.00.92, 9817.00.94, and 9817.00.96, the term "blind or other physically or mentally handicapped persons" includes any person suffering from a permanent or chronic physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more major life activities, such as caring for one's self, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, or working.

(b) Subheadings 9817.00.92, 9817.00.94, and 9817.00.96 do not cover --

(i) articles for acute or transient disability;

(ii) spectacles, dentures, and cosmetic articles for individuals not substantially disabled;

(iii) therapeutic and diagnostic articles; or

(iv) medicine or drugs.

Thus, according to Note 4, articles classifiable in the above subheading must meet the following requirements: (1) they must be designed for the benefit of persons suffering from a physical or mental impairment; (2) this impairment must substantially limit one or more major life activities; and, (3) this impairment must be permanent or chronic.

Incontinence refers to a person's inability to voluntarily control the passing of body wastes. An article entitled "Urinary Incontinence in Adults," begins with the following statement:

"Urinary incontinence, the involuntary loss of urine so severe as to have social and/or hygienic consequences, is a major clinical problem and a significant cause of disability and dependency." (Bold added). The article was published as a National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement, Vol. 7, #5, October 3-5, 1988, by the U.S. Government Printing Office. Incontinence is clearly an impairment.

Incontinence can, without the use of incontinent care products, interfere with life's activities, including a major life activity--working. Without incontinence care products, an individual suffering from incontinence would most likely find it difficult, if not impossible, to hold down a job.

The question still remains as to whether this brief is used by persons suffering from a permanent or chronic impairment, as opposed to an acute or transitory impairment.

The brief at issue is a well-constructed, sturdy and durable product. It is designed for long-term use of two years or more. In your submission, you point out the expense associated with purchasing and properly caring for the brief at issue. As you suggest, and we agree, an individual with acute or transitory incontinence would not be likely to purchase reusable products, such as that at issue, based on cost alone. Such an individual could easily meet their need for much less with disposable products.

The article at issue is sold to intermediate care, skilled nursing and chronic care facilities, such as Veterans Hospitals, which tend to have a large proportion of residents who suffer from permanent or chronic incontinence. In contrast. disposable products, which are less expensive, are invariably favored by acute care facilities and persons suffering from an incontinence problem expected to last only a short duration.

Based on your submissions, we agree that the product at issue is designed for the use of individuals suffering from permanent or chronic incontinence. We believe the article at issue meets the requirement for classification as an article designed for the use or benefit of handicapped persons as defined in Note 4.


The brief at issue is classified under heading 9817.00.9600, HTSUSA, which provides for articles specially designed or adapted for the use or benefit of the blind or other physically or mentally handicapped persons, other. Articles classified under this subheading are free of duty.

Pursuant to 19 CFR Section 177.9(d) (1989), HRL 085016 of September 19, 1989, is hereby revoked.

Please note that while this article is not subject to assessment of duty, this does not remove it from visa/quota requirements. However, as a product of Canada, it is not subject to visa/quota restrictions.


John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: