United States International Trade Commision Rulings And Harmonized Tariff Schedule
faqs.org  Rulings By Number  Rulings By Category  Tariff Numbers
faqs.org > Rulings and Tariffs Home > Rulings By Number > 1990 HQ Rulings > HQ 0083453 - HQ 0083562 > HQ 0083497

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

HQ 083497

March 28 1989

CLA-2:CO:R:C:G 083497 SR


TARIFF NO.: 9403.20.0030

Ms. Lisa Bastante
Test Rite Products
395 Allwood Road
Clifton, New Jersey 07012

RE: Classification of a metal tool chest on a roller cabinet

Dear Ms. Bastante:

This is in reference to your letter dated October 19, 1987, requesting the tariff classification of a tool chest with a roller cabinet under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated (HTSUSA).


The merchandise at issue consists of roller cabinets with tool chests stacked on top. The importer has submitted pictures of two different styles. In both styles the tool chest is made of steel and has stacked drawers. The tops each have two tongue and groove latches and a hasp for a padlock. One of the tool chests has a removable storage tray which fits under the lid of the top piece. The tool chests sit on cabinets which are seated on four casters. The cabinets are made of steel and have hinged doors. One cabinet has a pegboard interior and shelves in the storage area and the other cabinet has two stack drawers over a large storage area.


Whether the merchandise at issue is classifiable as a tool chest under 7326, HTSUSA, or as metal furniture under 9403, HTSUSA.


The tool box by itself would be classified under subheading 7326.90.9090, HTSUSA, which provides for articles of iron or steel. The cabinet would be classified under subheading 9403.20.0029, HTSUSA, which provides for other furniture and parts thereof, other metal furniture.

It has been suggested that the tool boxes are classifiable under heading 4202, HTSUSA, which provides for tool bags of leather or composition leather, of plastic sheeting, of textile materials, of vulcanized fiber, or of paperboard, or wholly or mainly covered with such materials. The merchandise at issue cannot be classified under this heading because it is not a tool bag and it is not composed of the materials required for this category.

The HTSUSA is interpreted according the General rules of interpretation (GRI), taken in order. Under GRI 3(b), goods that are put up in sets for retail sale shall be classified according to the component which imparts the essential character. The Explanatory Notes to the HTSUSA provide the official interpretation to the tariff schedule at the international level. The Explanatory Note to GRI 3(b) defines goods put up in sets for retail sale as goods which consist of at least two different articles which are prima facie classifiable in different headings, goods which consist of products put up together to meet a particular need or carry out a specific activity and are put up in a manner suitable for sale directly to users without repacking. The merchandise at issue meets this definition of a set.

The Explanatory Note to GRI 3(b) also states that the essential character will vary as between different kinds of goods. Factors which may be used to determine essential character are the nature of the component, its bulk, quantity, weight, or value, or by the role of a constituent material in relation to the use of the goods. Neither of the items at issue imparts the essential character of the merchandise. They both serve the same function. Neither item dominates in the factors listed above. The cabinet has more bulk but the tool chest probably plays a greater role because it stores tools and carries them to where they are needed.

Under GRI 3(c), goods that cannot be classified by reference to GRI 3(a) or 3(b), shall be classified under the heading which occurs last in numerical order among those which equally merit consideration.


According to GRI 3(c) the merchandise at issue is classifiable under subheading 9403.20.0030, HTSUSA, as other furniture and parts thereof: other metal furniture, other, other. The rate of duty is 4 percent ad valorem.


John Durant, Director

Previous Ruling Next Ruling

See also: