Search the Archives

RFC 2663: In section 4.3 twice NAT , given example is having one small...

Reader comments:

FAQS.ORG makes no guarantees as to the accuracy of the posts. Each post is the personal opinion of the poster. These posts are not intended to substitute for medical, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. FAQS.ORG does not endorse any opinion or any product or service mentioned mentioned in these posts.

<< Back to: RFC 2663

Comment by ganeshpoomal
Submitted on 8/24/2005
Related RFC: RFC 2663
Rating:	Rate this comment:
In section 4.3 twice NAT , given example is having one small printing flaw that is in the last line of this section the SA & DA are printed in wrong order. But logically it is a blunder. Kindly change it as soon as possble.