[ RFC Index | RFC Search | Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | Cities ]

    Search the Archives
Display RFC by number
    


RFC 2606: While agree with the proposition of a private top-level...

<< Back to: RFC 2606

 
Reader comments:
 

Comment by K. Bolino
Submitted on 10/20/2004
Related RFC: RFC 2606
Rating: Not yet rated Rate this comment: Vote
While agree with the proposition of a private top-level domain, I disagree with the use of a ".lan" suffix.  Those addresses are not specifically reserved for local-area networks.  Something like ".priv", ".local", or even ".localdomain" would be best.

 
 
FAQS.ORG makes no guarantees as to the accuracy of the posts. Each post is the personal opinion of the poster. These posts are not intended to substitute for medical, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. FAQS.ORG does not endorse any opinion or any product or service mentioned mentioned in these posts.

<< Back to: RFC 2606


© 2008 FAQS.ORG. All rights reserved.