Search the Archives

RFC 3911: The text from section 4 pasted below, contradicts the...

Reader comments:

FAQS.ORG makes no guarantees as to the accuracy of the posts. Each post is the personal opinion of the poster. These posts are not intended to substitute for medical, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. FAQS.ORG does not endorse any opinion or any product or service mentioned mentioned in these posts.

<< Back to: RFC 3911

Comment by nathan.scarlett@alcatel-lucent.com
Submitted on 4/25/2007
Related RFC: RFC 3911
Rating:	Rate this comment:
The text from section 4 pasted below, contradicts the example messages in section 8.1. In section 8.1, xyz is B's remote tag, but the join header sent to B has xyz as the to-tag. I think the to-tag and from-tag values in the example join header should be reversed.--Begin excerpt from Section 4.The to-tag and from-tag parameters are matched as if they were tags present in an incoming request. In other words the to-tag parameter is compared to the local tag, and the from-tag parameter is compared to the remote tag.--End excerpt