Search the Archives

RFC 2313: In my opinion there is an error in section 7.2. In Note 1...

Reader comments:

FAQS.ORG makes no guarantees as to the accuracy of the posts. Each post is the personal opinion of the poster. These posts are not intended to substitute for medical, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. FAQS.ORG does not endorse any opinion or any product or service mentioned mentioned in these posts.

<< Back to: RFC 2313

Comment by Dr. Ralph Wrzal
Submitted on 3/28/2007
Related RFC: RFC 2313
Rating: Not yet rated	Rate this comment:
In my opinion there is an error in section 7.2. In Note 1 you say:The presence of the values p, q, d mod (p-1), d mod (p-1), and q-1 mod p is intended for efficiency, as Quisquater and Couvreur have shown [QC82].but it should be :The presence of the values p, q, d mod (p-1), d mod (q-1), and q-1 mod p is intended for efficiency, as Quisquater and Couvreur have shown [QC82].The difference is the q in d mod (q-1) !