Search the Archives

RFC 1939: Hi there, great work... but (ther's always a but) I'd...

<< Back to: RFC 1939

Reader comments:

FAQS.ORG makes no guarantees as to the accuracy of the posts. Each post is the personal opinion of the poster. These posts are not intended to substitute for medical, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. FAQS.ORG does not endorse any opinion or any product or service mentioned mentioned in these posts.

<< Back to: RFC 1939

Comment by AceLine
Submitted on 11/22/2006
Related RFC: RFC 1939
Rating: Not yet rated	Rate this comment:
Hi there, great work... but (ther's always a but) I'd prefered to delete a message on sending the unique-id of message. in my web-redaction (no IMAP possible) I'm using POP3 and do have to check against the db (mails stored in) which mails already exists to not get them double. that makes it very slowly sometimes. a per-session-id to deal with manipulating messages on the server is realy not a good idea. an optional use of argument unique-id would have been better. BUT: thnx. for great work. cu. Ingmar