Search the Archives

RFC 1394: A new document should probably be done to include more...

Reader comments:

FAQS.ORG makes no guarantees as to the accuracy of the posts. Each post is the personal opinion of the poster. These posts are not intended to substitute for medical, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. FAQS.ORG does not endorse any opinion or any product or service mentioned mentioned in these posts.

<< Back to: RFC 1394

Comment by Paul Robinson
Submitted on 11/22/2003
Related RFC: RFC 1394
Rating: Not yet rated	Rate this comment:
A new document should probably be done to include more information and drop some now obsolete information in this document.