Patent application number | Description | Published |
20090190485 | Method of Closed Loop Power Control Adjusted by Self-Interference - A method and apparatus for controlling the transmit power of a mobile device in a mobile communication network takes the level of self-interference into account to perform inner-loop power control. For normal inner-loop power control, a signal quality estimate is compared to a signal quality target and power control commands are generated based on the comparison. When self-interference is the dominant impairment in the received signal, a “fast break” is introduced to change inner-loop power control command generation. | 07-30-2009 |
20090291642 | Systems and Methods for SIR Estimation for Power Control - Systems and methods according to these exemplary embodiments provide for methods and systems for improving the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SIR) estimation between a mobile communications device and a base station (BS) for improving power control. A first SIR estimate is generated based on signals received on at least a first channel and a second SIR estimate is generated based on signals received on a second channel. A correction factor for the second SIR estimate is generated based on at least the first SIR estimate, and the second SIR estimate is adjusted with the correction factor. The first SIR estimate can, optionally, be generated using channel coefficients generated from signals received on both the first channel and the second channel. | 11-26-2009 |
20100002813 | Soft Scaling Method and Apparatus - A received signal of interest is processed by determining timing of interference spikes in the received signal of interest. Receivers can determine when certain types of interference spikes are expected to occur, e.g., based on when different users are scheduled to transmit data during an overlapping portion of the same transmission time interval. The interference timing information is used by the receiver to soft scale signal values recovered from the received signal of interest that coincide with the interference spikes separately from remaining ones of the signal values. This way, fast changing interference power can be accurately tracked during periods of known interference spikes while also accurately tracking slower changing interference power during other periods. | 01-07-2010 |
20100020854 | Method and Apparatus for Communication Signal Processing Based on Mixed Parametric and Non-Parametric Estimation of Impairment Correlations - According to the teachings presented herein, a method and apparatus for communication signal processing advantageously use a mix of parametric and non-parametric correlation estimation in communication signal processing. Non-parametric estimation generates an “overall” correlation estimate for a received communication signal, and parametric estimation generates a “component” correlation estimate. The component correlation estimate is removed from the overall correlation estimate to form a partial correlation estimate that is used to process the received communication signal at least initially, such as in a pre-equalization stage. The overall and component correlation estimates are generated as impairment and/or data correlation estimates. | 01-28-2010 |
20110105166 | Method and Arrangement in a Telecommunication System - In a method of radio link handling in a radio base station (RBS) in a telecommunication system, said radio base station (RBS) supporting a plurality of mobile user equipment (UE) and comprising a plurality of antenna arrangements each associated with a respective determined cell coverage area. Performing the steps of actively determining ( | 05-05-2011 |
20120188951 | Preferential Allocation of Different Length Scrambling Codes - A base station herein assists a radio network controller (RNC) to allocate scrambling codes in a cell. The base station's assistance advantageously permits the RNC to allocate different length scrambling codes to different mobile terminals (or downlink carriers) in the cell. Specifically, the base station determines a preference for whether the length of a scrambling code to be allocated to each terminal or carrier should be short or long, based on whether uplink communications transmitted by the terminal, or downlink communications transmitted over the carrier, are to be processed with a high-complexity receiver or a low-complexity receiver. The RNC receives these preferences from the base station and takes them into account in order to allocate either a short scrambling code or a long scrambling code to each terminal or downlink carrier in the cell. The RNC then propagates the scrambling code allocations throughout the cell. | 07-26-2012 |
20130077657 | FINGER PLACEMENT IN MULTI-STAGE INTERFERENCE CANCELLATION - In a receive node of a wireless network, an iterative multi-user multi-stage interference cancellation receiver is used. After each stage of interference cancellation, interference characteristics change. An adaptive finger placement strategy is used in which after each stage of interference cancellation, finger delays and combining weights of the receiver are adapted to reflect the changed interference characteristics. | 03-28-2013 |
20130077670 | IMPAIRMENT COVARIANCE AND COMBINING WEIGHT UPDATES DURING ITERATIVE TURBO INTERFERENCE CANCELLATION RECEPTION - In a receive node of a wireless network, an iterative multi-user multi-stage interference cancellation receiver is used. After each stage of interference cancellation, interference characteristics change. An adaptive strategy is used in which after each stage of interference cancellation, impairment covariance is parametrically updated and combining weights of the receiver are adapted to reflect the updated impairment covariance. | 03-28-2013 |
20130077720 | MULTI-STAGE TURBO EQUALIZATION AND INTERFERENCE CANCELLATION RECEIVER FOR WIRELESS SYSTEMS - In a receive node of a wireless network, an iterative multi-user multi-stage interference cancellation receiver is used. The receiver performs code-averaged equalization and chip chip-level code-specific interference over-cancellation on the received signals. This can result in a unified interference cancellation processing, and can avoid cumbersome calculations of code cross correlations that is required in symbol-level interference cancellation. A symbol-level code-averaged desired signal add-back is performed to address the over-cancellation of some desired signals. | 03-28-2013 |