Inventors list

Assignees list

Classification tree browser

Top 100 Inventors

Top 100 Assignees


Carol S.

Carol S. Jeffcoate, Long Beach, CA US

Patent application numberDescriptionPublished
20110100584METHOD OF DETERMINING EFFECTIVE HEAT TRANSFER CAPABILITY OF A FLUID COOLANT COMPOSITION - A method of determining effective heat transfer capability of a fluid coolant composition, the method comprising the steps of: determining a critical cooling effectiveness percentage value for the fluid coolant composition; and determining whether the critical cooling effectiveness percentage value is greater than zero percent, thereby determining whether the fluid coolant composition has effective heat transfer capability; wherein the critical cooling effectiveness percentage is high enough to indicate an increased heat transfer capability of the fluid coolant composition and is low enough to substantially prevent deleterious effects on other properties of the fluid coolant composition.05-05-2011

Carol S. Jeffcoate, Danbury, CT US

Patent application numberDescriptionPublished
20090123793Heat Transfer Compositions with High Electrical Resistance for Fuel Cell Assemblies - The present invention relates generally to heat transfer compositions. More particularly, the present invention relates to heat transfer compositions with high electrical resistance for use in power-generating equipment or in engines. Such compositions are particularly useful in fuel cell assemblies.05-14-2009

Carol S. Mellgren, Tucson, AZ US

Patent application numberDescriptionPublished
20090094483METHOD OF MAINTAINING TASK SEQUENCE WITHIN A TASK DOMAIN ACROSS ERROR RECOVERY - Tracks of data or other data units are copied from a primary storage system to a secondary storage system. For multiple-track or multiple-data unit transfers, a group of tracks or data units which are sequentially related are transferred. A respective task is defined at the primary storage system for monitoring a progress of the transfer of each of the respective data units in a group. A state is maintained for monitoring a progress of the transfer of the group responsive to the progress of each of the tasks. A normal state is selected when there are no failed tasks. A recovery state is selected when there is a failure, and the status of the remaining tasks is being ascertained. A retry state is selected following the recovery state to retry the failed tasks. A failed state indicates an unrecoverable failure.04-09-2009

Carol S. Surowy, Sturtevant, WI US