[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Part01 - Part02 - Part03 - Part04 - Part05 - Part06 - Part07 - Part08 - Part09 - Part10 - Part11 - Part12 - Part13 - Part14 - Single Page
Top Document: Win95 FAQ Part 3 of 14: Usage
Previous Document: News Headers
Next Document: 3.2. Basic Win95 usage vs MS-DOS (TM)
-
Search the FAQ Archives
Part01 - Part02 - Part03 - Part04 - Part05 - Part06 - Part07 - Part08 - Part09 - Part10 - Part11 - Part12 - Part13 - Part14 - Single Page
Top Document: Win95 FAQ Part 3 of 14: Usage
Previous Document: News Headers
Next Document: 3.2. Basic Win95 usage vs MS-DOS (TM)
3.1. Basic Win95 usage vs Windows 3.x
Win95 sports the cool new Explorer Desktop, in an attempt to be more Mac-like. Try to forget what you know about Program Manager, File Manager, Print Manager, etc because very little of it applies! Win 3.1 programs will run like they used to; the window might look a bit different, and there might be some extra buttons on the border, but they will work otherwise. Get used to using your right mouse button. On an Amiga, the right button was a "menu" button which brought up a hidden menu. On OS/2, it brings up menus for each object you click on. On Win95, it acts like the OS/2 right-click except it pretty much works on anything; window title bars, the Start Menu, any kind of icon, properties sheets, whatever. Win 3.1 programs run in a single process under Win95, cooperatively multitasking as they always did since Windows/386. This means one Win 3.1 app can suspend the entire Win 3.1 session. In fact, one Win 3.1 app can suspend all of Win95! This is purely for compatibility.
Top Document: Win95 FAQ Part 3 of 14: Usage
Previous Document: News Headers
Next Document: 3.2. Basic Win95 usage vs MS-DOS (TM)
Part01 - Part02 - Part03 - Part04 - Part05 - Part06 - Part07 - Part08 - Part09 - Part10 - Part11 - Part12 - Part13 - Part14 - Single Page
[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
gordonf@intouch.bc.ca
Last Update October 22 2009 @ 05:35 AM