And Joe Bernstein wrote: a bunch of stuff (which he admitted
had a certain amount of kvetchiness), which I don't have any
particular disagreement with and so won't take the list's
(or my) time by responding to in detail.
This proves, of course, that the diplomatic approach is really
the better one. My assertion that "the `traditional' approach...
is... better or at least more deserving of the name `FAQ list'"
was of course only my opinion, and should not be construed as any
kind of official policy statement. Not only that, but it's not
any condemnation of a document that doesn't fit the "traditional"
format, merely a suggestion (again, in my opinion) that "FAQ list"
might not be the best name for it.
Steve Summit
scs@eskimo.com