Re: Automatic response to WHAT???

---------

Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Sat, 21 Jun 1997 11:29:45 -0400


Omer Zak <xlacha1@wizard.weizmann.ac.il> writes:
> I received the enclosed automatic response.
> The problem is that I am not aware of anything sent by me to one of those
> who handle FAQ related administrative messages.I am afraid someone else
> might have sent them forged E-mail message requesting something of which
> I'd not approve.

While it might have been a forged request, considerably less-sinister
explanations also exist. In particular, if your FAQ arrived at some
Usenet site sans its Approved: header, it would've gotten bounced to
the news.answers.* admins, and you would've gotten this response.
There are a couple ways that could happen: for instance someone trying
to repost FAQs during cleanup after an unauthorized canceller, and not
getting the Approved: lines right. (A lot of us got such notices during
an episode just like that, a few months ago.) Or, since your FAQ
evidently goes to bitnet mail lists, I wouldn't be at all surprised if
some gateway stripped the Approved: header, and then it eventually wound
up back on Usenet...

> Can the maintainer of the auto-responder improve it so that it'll enclose
> also the E-mail message which is being auto-replied to?

This does seem like an excellent suggestion. Maybe enclosing the full
headers and the first dozen or so body lines would be sufficient.

regards, tom lane