Re: Junk Mail

Mark Eckenwiler (eck@panix.com)
Wed, 29 Jan 1997 12:15:40 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Justin Sheehy: "Re: Junk Mail"
Previous message: Adam Frey: "aus-ads FAQ being cancelled"
Maybe in reply to: Nick Zitzmann: "Junk Mail"
Next in thread: Justin Sheehy: "Re: Junk Mail"

Wolfram v.Kiparski writes:
+
+ What to do? Someone sent me this bit of info, and I was wondering if
+ anyone has heard of this:
+ ****
+ Unsolicited advertizing e-mail to any computer with an attached printer is a
+ violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1992 [TCPA]47 USC 227 and
+ FCC 47 CFR 64.1200.

It's a bogus argument. See www.panix.com/~eck/junkmail.html

-- Lex axilla justitiae.

Mark Eckenwiler eck@panix.com

Next message: Justin Sheehy: "Re: Junk Mail"
Previous message: Adam Frey: "aus-ads FAQ being cancelled"
Maybe in reply to: Nick Zitzmann: "Junk Mail"
Next in thread: Justin Sheehy: "Re: Junk Mail"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]