Agreed!
> If they can't afford their T1, then they won't be able to send spam
> out. If their provider cuts off their accounts, they won't be able
> to send spam. If their system crashes (either due to an overload
> in mail sent to abuse@site, root@site, postmaster@site, etc. or due
> to an outside attack [very tempting...cyberpromo.com runs Sendmail
> v8.7.3...]), then the ability to send spam out will be severely
> curtailed.
If I was the type of person who wanted to abuse the net, I would:
o sell spamming software to everyone and anyone
o alias {abuse,root,postmaster}@site to /dev/null
o be very secure about my system
My point is what was suggested won't do any good... eventually. I
really believe that the only way to combat spam is at the receiving
end. Kinda backwards but...
-- Pablo Sanchez | Ph # (415) 933.3812 Fax # (415) 933.2821 pablo@sgi.com | Pg # (800) 930.5635 -or- pablo_p@corp.sgi.com =============================================================================== I am accountable for my actions. http://reality.sgi.com/pablo [ /Sybase_FAQ ]