Re: FAQ cancellations.

---------

Chris Lewis (clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca)
Mon, 18 Nov 1996 18:21:55 -0500


On Nov 18, 15:56, "Taki Kogoma" wrote:
} Subject: Re: FAQ cancellations.
} Danny R. Faught supposedly composed:
} >
} > You seem to be saying that there's some legitimate reason to
} > cross-post an article to gobs of newsgroups. I can't think of a
} > single case where this is appropriate.
}
} Define 'gobs'.
}
} I can easily think of FAQs that go to 5+ newsgroups: Sub-hierarchy
} overview/charters.

Can you think of any FAQs that need to be cross-posted to over 125
groups? That's how many you'd have to post to to get despammed
under current BI=20 rules/implementation and using maximal cross-posting.

There actually is a FAQ under autocancel because the person insists on
uni-posting it to 40 groups. No, it's not a *.answers FAQ, and the person
is finally beginning to respond to my suggestions to cross-post the thing.

-- 
For more information on spam, including countermeasures and resources,
see the Internet Spam Boycott, at <URL:http://www.vix.com/spam/>.

Chris Lewis: _Una confibula non sat est_



[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@landfield.com

© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved