I've been doing some pretty extensive re-writing of the
comp.mail.sendmail FAQ, and I've submitted it for re-approval by the
news.answers moderators at MIT. However, I'd like to know what other
FAQ Maintainers think of what I've got so far -- both form and
content.
I'm particularly curious to see what other folks have to say about
my message digest format, the table of contents, the way I've chosen
to split the file into two parts (and the similar lines at the top),
the RFC 1807 format bibliography, etc....
Feel free to send all responses to me here at work
<BKnowles@aol.net>, my home address <brad@his.com>, or the official
sendmail FAQ Maintainers address <sendmail-faq@etext.org> which will
forward to my home address.
The latest version of the comp.mail.sendmail FAQ itself (with all
proposed changes) can be found at:
http://ftp.his.com/pub/brad/sendmail/newfaq/part1
http://ftp.his.com/pub/brad/sendmail/newfaq/part2
Or, you can access it through the web page I keep to support the
FAQ at <http://www.his.com/~brad/sendmail/>.
--
Brad Knowles MIME/PGP: BKnowles@aol.net
Mail Systems Administrator <http://www.his.com/~brad/>
for America Online, Inc. Ph: (703) 453-4148
PGP keys available from pgp-public-keys@pgp.ai.mit.edu
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved