Re: Controversial information in FAQs

---------

Era Eriksson (reriksso@cc.helsinki.fi)
Thu, 22 Feb 1996 22:28:00 +0200


On Thu, 22 Feb 1996 14:42:59 -0500 (EST),
buglady@bronze.lcs.mit.edu (Aliza R. Panitz) wrote:
>> I'd say, in regards to FAQs on religion, etc, it would probably be
>> important to have factual information only in the FAQ, or to have two FAQs
>> arguing different perspectives on the issues, posted consecutively at
>> regular intervals.
> When the soc.culture.jewish FAQ was compiled, an attempt was made to
> include multiple flavors of the truth - each section has between one and
> four "answers", written from the viewpoint of the committee member who
> contributed it.

This isn't exactly religion, to many people, but here goes,
nevertheless ...
One piece of reading which I've enjoyed a lot is the "bible" for
Perl programming, _Programming Perl_. There is one part where the
authors discuss different optimization techniques, and argue for
diametrically opposite solutions, with good reasons for both. Not only
is this "fair", it's also thought-provoking, and fun.
I was going to quote a snippet here but I'll spare you. Get the
book. It's eminently readable and a knowledge of Perl couldn't hurt
anybody, these days.
Don't get the book. It's not up to date with respect to Perl 5 which
is what everybody use these days anyway. And leave the programming to
programmers, you'll only hurt yourself, and piss off the pig, as the
saying goes.

/* era */

This is my first post to this list. Flame me gently.
_Programming Perl_, Larry Wall && Randal L. Schwartz; O'Reilly 1990
ISBN 0-937175-64-1

<http://www.ora.com/www/info/perl/>; <http://www.cis.ufl.edu/perl/>

-- 
See <http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/~reriksso/> for mantra, disclaimer, etc.


[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@landfield.com

© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved