Re: FAQ-Creation (Was Re: How to create a FAQ here [APTaoism]?)

Adam B. Roach (adam.roach@exu.ericsson.se)
Wed, 7 Feb 1996 11:43:57 -0600 (CST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Lloyd Wood: "Re: FAQ-Creation (Was Re: How to create a FAQ here [APTaoism]?)"
Previous message: Todd C. Lawson: "Re: FAQ Maintainers Daily Digest"
Next in thread: tyaginator: "Re: FAQ-Creation (Was Re: How to create a FAQ here [APTaoism]?)"

Lloyd Wood <eep1lw@ee.surrey.ac.uk> writes:

>As for the dweebs who take any FAQ as gospel truth, let's hope to God
>that they don't start believing what they read in the National Enquirer.

That's not really a fair comparison. By their nature, FAQs are scrutinized
by a large audience (including many experts) under a very bright light.
Not everything that appears in a FAQ is necessarily true, granted,
but they tend to be well reviewed and consequently fairly accurate.

Now, on idealogical issues, of course, there is a completely different
set of rules; I'm refering to techinical FAQs.

-- 
Adam Roach -- adam.roach@exu.ericsson.se -- Standard Disclaimers, etc.

Next message: Lloyd Wood: "Re: FAQ-Creation (Was Re: How to create a FAQ here [APTaoism]?)"
Previous message: Todd C. Lawson: "Re: FAQ Maintainers Daily Digest"
Next in thread: tyaginator: "Re: FAQ-Creation (Was Re: How to create a FAQ here [APTaoism]?)"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]