If we apply this to newly formed newsgroups only, the problem
soc.culture.russian is now facing cannot be solved.
If we apply this to current newsgroups, you can imagine how heavy a load
for news.answers moderation team will show up. I am afraid the backlogs
for the moderation process for news.answers will be more than 2 years.
Once I was interested to join the moderation team if I can easily catch
up with the skills required, to contribute my time for Usenet community.
However, if the moderation team should also handle voting processes and
results, I guess I would not.
===================================================
Forwarded message:
> From FAQ-Maintainers@consensus.com Tue Aug 13 14:04 PDT 1996
> Message-Id: <199608132038.QAA68434@ns4-1.CC.Lehigh.EDU>
> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 16:38:56 EDT
> From: pv02@Lehigh.EDU (PETER VOROBIEFF)
> Subject: Re: A solution to *.answers content moderation
>
> Edward Reid writes...
>
> >Voting on the actual text of an FAQ would not work, not only for this
> >reason but also because most FAQs are constantly changing. The proposal
> >would have to vote on an FAQ maintainer.
>
> Or a team of such. I'd say that this is a good and constructive point.
>
> Furhermore, I would suggest that the vote for appointing the FAQ
> maintainer should be held prior to submitting the FAQ to news.answers,
> with the posting right granted only to the maintainers who have
> passed the vote of acceptance for the alpha versions of their FAQs
> in their newsgroups.
>
> P.V.
>
>
-- Tung-chiang Yang tcyang@ee.ucla.edu Dept. of Electrical Engineering, UCLA, USA Aug 13, 1996
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved