Re: Berserk alternative FAQ : more bad news...

---------

PETER VOROBIEFF (pv02@Lehigh.EDU)
Sun, 11 Aug 1996 23:59:42 EDT


Quoting Zoli Fekete...
>As a matter of fact, the paranoia guy's "FAQ" is doing just that with
>imaginary votes, cancellation procedures and the like presented (although
>I do not know - nor particularly care - if that is posted to news.answers
>or NANAM only). I do not consider the contra-FAQ "_serious_" and in my
>opinion you're a but overestimating its effectiveness, incidentally - it
>just seems to overboard for that, IMHO.

The "FAQ" Iatskovski sends goes to _both_ the victim and to
the victim's postmaster. Yeah sure, the unloaded flint rifle is not
very effective as a firearm, but if you whack somebody on
the head with it fifty or sixty times, it may produce some effect.
"What I tell you three times is true" technique. The Big Lie.
Repeat it (and repost it to news.ansewers) enough times -
and people will believe it.

> Yeah, but they are more likely to suckle on the fountain of relevations
>in s.c.r than in n.a, so it would matter little what happens with the
>"official" copy there don't you think?

The admin receives the copy of Iatskovski junk mail. He starts
looking up Iatskovsky's "FAQ" on the Web. It's in a zillion
places now. He sees "Approved." He says, "gee, that's official."
And, instead of chewing the ass off Compu$loth, he gives a thrashing
to the user.

The situation is not hypothetical. This has ALREADY HAPPENED.

I don't know the solution. Compu$lime has been aware of the problem
for days; the fakeFAQbot is up and running; there ain't no justice.

P.V.



[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@landfield.com

© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved