The material has also shown to have the depth of an onion skin.
Research is apperantly one of the things that the editors thereof
consider to be 'optional'.
> It may be in our interests to contact these people and ask if they want to
> put out a book on FAQs to create this comprehensive listing of locations for
> any FAQ officially put out into the ether (their web and mail addresses are
> in each book, but I don't have them here at work to pass on).
I would not support farming this project out to Michael Wolff and co.
(The publishers of the Net<Foo> series -- which, BTW, is not connected
to NetGuide according to reports on news.admin.* last year). Keep in
mind that this is the crew who spammed Usenet with ads for _NetChat_.
If a book of FAQs is to be published[1], I agree that a net-saavy bunch
like ORA would be the way to go.
[1] Of course, I expect that there would be many maintainers who would
not want their works included in such a volume due to the fluid nature
of their subjects (constantly-changing information) and would prefer
to have the most up-to-date version be the most visible one.
--
Capt. Gym Z. Quirk (Known to some as Taki Kogoma) quirk@unm.edu
I'll get a life when someone demonstrates it would be superior to
what I have now.
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved