Re: Who wins?

Tim Pierce (twpierce@midway.uchicago.edu)
Tue, 16 May 95 12:21:40 CDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alex Lopez-Ortiz: "Re: Possible solution to FAQ publishing problem"
Previous message: James D. Murray: "Re: Possible solution to FAQ publishing problem"
In reply to: Dave Barr: "Re: Who wins?"
Next in thread: Discord: "Re: Who wins?"
Next in thread: Frederic Albrecht: "Re: Who wins?"
Reply: Discord: "Re: Who wins?"

> This is all kinda shaky ground, but it is along the same lines as value
> added for a CD-ROM. Putting "this FAQ can't be used for commercial
> purposes" or somesuch basically means the copyright is meaningless.
> The fact that it is posted to Usenet means that it will be sold several
> times as it flows about the net.

Right. I maintain, however, that specifying that your
document may be distributed via impermanent electronic
media will suffice for this situation. I know that not
everyone agrees with me on this, but pppbbbpbtpbtpbtpbt to
you.

Next message: Alex Lopez-Ortiz: "Re: Possible solution to FAQ publishing problem"
Previous message: James D. Murray: "Re: Possible solution to FAQ publishing problem"
In reply to: Dave Barr: "Re: Who wins?"
Next in thread: Discord: "Re: Who wins?"
Next in thread: Frederic Albrecht: "Re: Who wins?"
Reply: Discord: "Re: Who wins?"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]