Revising the guidelines

Pamela Greene (pgreene@optics.rochester.edu)
Tue, 11 Jul 1995 10:33:17 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jon Leech: "What's up with Fine's HTML FAQ archives?"
Previous message: Rachel Polanskis: "Re: Re[2]: Ohio State HTML FAQ archive is down"
Next in thread: Rachel Polanskis: "Re: Revising the guidelines"
Reply: Rachel Polanskis: "Re: Revising the guidelines"
Reply: Rachel Polanskis: "Re: Revising the guidelines"
Reply: Rachel Polanskis: "Re: Revising the guidelines"

I am in the process of revising the *.answers guidelines, with the
main goal of making them easier to use. Specific and constructive
suggestions for the guidelines would be welcomed. For more general
comments, I would ask that you please wait until you've seen the new
version. (Don't hold your breath, though; I just got started on it.)

Although I'm reluctant to specify a particular format for FAQs in the
guidelines, if there are a small number of formats which we can
collectively agree are suitable, it would certainly be appropriate for
the guidelines to mention them as possibilities.

- Pam Greene (news-answers-request@mit.edu)
one of the *.answers moderators and faq-maintainers list folks
not necessarily speaking for the moderation team as a whole

Next message: Jon Leech: "What's up with Fine's HTML FAQ archives?"
Previous message: Rachel Polanskis: "Re: Re[2]: Ohio State HTML FAQ archive is down"
Next in thread: Rachel Polanskis: "Re: Revising the guidelines"
Reply: Rachel Polanskis: "Re: Revising the guidelines"
Reply: Rachel Polanskis: "Re: Revising the guidelines"
Reply: Rachel Polanskis: "Re: Revising the guidelines"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]