[snip]
#
# Rather than have this subsdide into a miasma of legal nitpicking, why=
=20not
# send a second, very simple, letter stating clearly that the signatori=
es have
# not objection to what WC are doing, and leave it at that. No need to =
discuss
# motifations (which differ between authors anyway).
#
Hear, hear. This beats another month of working out the language,
which would probably end up with yetanotherlettertowalnutcreek.
I can see it now, one giant mailing to WC containing a dozen letters, e=
ach
signed by a dozen of us.
By the way, I think we should all adopt "URL:" in the secondary header.
<ducking>
(Really.)
--=20
ciao,
Tomas Willis (tomas@cae.wisc.edu || tomas@dialin-<X>.engr.wisc.edu)
%cat std-disclaimer | more
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved