PATNEWS: PTO accepting USENET FAQs are formal prior art

Pat Berry (pat@berry.Cary.NC.US)
Thu, 05 Jan 95 20:37:54 EST

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Pat Berry: "Re: How long a periodicity for FAQ posting?"
Previous message: Andrew M. Langmead: "Re: How long a periodicity for FAQ posting?"
Next in thread: Terry Carroll: "Re: PATNEWS: PTO accepting USENET FAQs are formal prior art"
Reply: Terry Carroll: "Re: PATNEWS: PTO accepting USENET FAQs are formal prior art"

Terry Carroll writes:

> I though the other subscribers of this list would find the
> attached interesting. I'm not at all surprised that FAQs have
> been cited as prior art.

For the benefit of us non-lawyers, could you define the term "prior
art"?

Next message: Pat Berry: "Re: How long a periodicity for FAQ posting?"
Previous message: Andrew M. Langmead: "Re: How long a periodicity for FAQ posting?"
Next in thread: Terry Carroll: "Re: PATNEWS: PTO accepting USENET FAQs are formal prior art"
Reply: Terry Carroll: "Re: PATNEWS: PTO accepting USENET FAQs are formal prior art"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]