Re: MIME

---------

mathew (mathew@mantis.co.uk)
Wed, 28 Sep 1994 14:22:22 +0100


In message <199409281115.MAA07114@strider.inet.it>,
Piero Serini writes:
>I think we're getting religious pro/con Mac & MIME.
>This will be the last message to the list, let's take this offline :)

Well, there are some misconceptions which need clearing up.

>> UUencode for the Mac? Don't make me laugh. I'm a Mac user. If I get
>> a MIME file, the mailer automatically decodes it for me and produces a
>> nice little icon.
>
>I understand. Unfortunately, Macs are not the vast majority of
>computer users.

But Macs *are* very common amongst clueless newbies, who are exactly
the people who need FAQs.

>But you still can do it. I think the point is:
>
> Mac The rest of the world :) strange OSes (DOS, ...)
>
>uuencode avail. standard avail.

Uuencode is only "standard" on UNIX, and it's broken on most UNIXes
I've seen.

>MIME nice maybe impossible (*) avail.

MIME is available for UNIX, Mac, Amiga, Atari ST, and PC (Windows, DOS
and OS/2). I think that covers 99% of the systems out there which
newbies are likely to be using. There's a simple decoder in C which
you could compile on VMS; I'm not sure if there are better packages
for VMS, because I don't use that system.

>NOTE: (*) I know of sites who sill refuse to install MIME, and I can't
> blame them.

Why?

>> If uuencode worked, MIME would have used it.
>
>Please! uuencode honestly worked since '60, and I think you can
>make it wark on every platform, despite all the difficulties you
>had.

No, you can't. Uuencode uses characters which are dropped or mangled
by some existing network systems. That means you *can't* get it to
work, no matter what you have at the recipient's end, because the data
hasn't got through.

Anyway, enough.

mathew



[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@landfield.com

© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved