Re: Improving efficiency of *.answers moderation process

Peter Goudswaard (pgoudswa@cln.etc.bc.ca)
Tue, 27 Sep 94 17:09:16 PDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Aliza R. Panitz: "*.answers Subject lines (Was: efficiency.)"
Previous message: Robert F. Heeter: "Improving Efficiency..."
In reply to: Stephen Potter: "Re: Improving efficiency of *.answers moderation process"

> > From uunet!bronze.lcs.mit.edu!buglady Tue Sep 27 15:21:10 1994
> >
> > There are a few basic things that I'd like to remind everyone of:
> >
> > (2) If you change your Subject line, you must get approval beforehand.
> > Otherwise, the software that keeps the most recent copy of your
> > FAQ in our archives gets confused, and keeps one or more stale
> > copies around. Even simple things like adding "(FAQ)" or "READ
> > BEFORE POSTING" to the end of the subject line create an
> > exception that must be dealt with by hand.

Yikes! Everytime I put out a new FAQ, the last part of my Subject line
is "... FAQ v2.5", and that version number changes every month! I do
include a Version line in the auxiliary header, too. Should I stop
doing this? The archive at rtfm seems to be handling it okay.

-- 
 Peter Goudswaard                 |~~~~~~|      _/^\_      |~~~~~~|
 pgoudswa@cln.etc.bc.ca           |      |  _/\_\   /_/\_  |      |
 goudswap@sd28.quesnel.bc.ca      |      |  >___________<  |      |
 goudswaa@sfu.ca                  |______|        |        |______|

Next message: Aliza R. Panitz: "*.answers Subject lines (Was: efficiency.)"
Previous message: Robert F. Heeter: "Improving Efficiency..."
In reply to: Stephen Potter: "Re: Improving efficiency of *.answers moderation process"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]