Re: Cross-posting to *.answers (was: de.rec.fahrrad FAQ part 0)

---------

Snakes of Medusa (mathew@mantis.co.uk)
21 Feb 1994 11:48:59 -0000


In article <2k3rop$q8p@eff.org>, Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org> wrote:
>Some of us *do not have the time* to learn the hermetics of the secondary
>headers of FAQs, and some of us really don't *care* whether it has fancy
>Expires: and such headers in the real header section (ever heard of a date
>and a version number? Works fine for software, works fine for FAQs).

No it doesn't. If you don't put in a proper Expires header, many
sites will throw the FAQ away after two days rather than keeping it
around for new users to read. Hence the FAQ doesn't serve its
purpose, because people *still* post FAQ-related questions, because
when they turn up the FAQ isn't there.

I've done it. I looked in news.answers for an FAQ on topic <x>,
didn't find one, and because our site obeys Expires: lines I assumed
there wasn't an FAQ for topic <x>, or else we'd have it. So I posted
an FAQ-related question.

mathew

-- 
I have a flawless philosophical and scientific model of reality.
Unfortunately, it's actual size.  We must never be dogmatic.  Anyone
who says otherwise is wrong.  Will betray country for food.  Annoy the 
censors -- mention Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka in your .signature.


[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@landfield.com

© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved