Re: de.rec.fahrrad FAQ part 0

Snakes of Medusa (mathew@mantis.co.uk)
18 Feb 1994 10:58:17 -0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Thomas Koenig: "Re: de.rec.fahrrad FAQ part 0"
Previous message: Snakes of Medusa: "Re: de.rec.fahrrad FAQ part 0"

In article <19940217.7AF6ED0.15308@serpens.rhein.de>,
S.P.Zeidler <spz@serpens.rhein.de> wrote:
>I explained to him in the mail I sent him previous to the one he cited,
>that there is _no_ distribution de, and that it had been voted down as
>impractical.

Well, it's now been voted up as necessary.

> The private email he had the bad netiquette to cite

You demanded that I should take the complaint to the moderators of
news.answers. So I did. Don't tell me to do something and then
whine when I do it, you weasel.

mathew

-- 
I have a flawless philosophical and scientific model of reality.
Unfortunately, it's actual size.  We must never be dogmatic.  Anyone
who says otherwise is wrong.  Will betray country for food.  Annoy the 
censors -- mention Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka in your .signature.

Next message: Thomas Koenig: "Re: de.rec.fahrrad FAQ part 0"
Previous message: Snakes of Medusa: "Re: de.rec.fahrrad FAQ part 0"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]