![]()
Personally, I don't think languages have anything to do with regional
distributions/hierarchies. There are German speakers (and French
speakers and Finnish and Japanese and whatever) here in California. I
don't see the parallel between "something only relevant to people in
Germany" and, say, "something written in German". It depends *what*
was written in German: an article, in a sports newsgroup,
discussing the latest Monchen-Gladbach v. Karlsruhe football match
might not be of global interest, but an article in German about
commercialization of the Olympics might be.
What is probably needed is a Language: header, and then you could
filter for it at the newsreader level. (I don't read German, so I
probably would do so, even though the articles might contain
information useful to me.) I don't see the need to filter out
foreign (to the site) language articles at the transport level, except
to the extent of not bothering with entire hierarchies that are not in
the local languge; the worst-case scenario being, of course, languages
requiring special character sets that will be incomprehensible without
special hardware and/or software.
-- Michael C. Berch mcb@net.bio.net / mcb@postmodern.com
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
![]()
© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved