My Next Trick

---------

L. Detweiler (ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu)
Sun, 06 Feb 94 20:01:40 -0700


I suggested myself that there is somewhat of a distinction, but
hair-thin, between a list of `answers to questions' and a `pointer
page' (the definition changes variously, but let's just say,
approximately, `hypertext FAQ'). Others have been emphasizing the
distinction, others not. I would like to ask anyone who thinks that
their FAQ list cannot be reformulated, or would not be *better*, in
hypertext form to send me some of the questions you claim cannot be
`hypertexted' and I will `hypertext' them for you as examples.

(It seems to me that the *worst* FAQs are the ones that cannot easily
be `hypertexted', and perhaps I can demonstrate that. Here's why: a
hypertext document is really nothing but a document where its
references have been made *explicit* rather than implicit. That is, a
document might say `experts agree that you should do [x].' a hypertext
document would say, `experts [a][b][c] agree that you should do [x]. '
where [a][b][c] are all hypertext buttons that could lead to the actual
quotes. The documents that *don't* have references to their answers,
e.g. sort of exist in a vacuum, `handed down from above', in the prior
form, seem to me to be *poor writing* because of the lack of
referencing. Existing FAQs that qualify all their statements anyway,
like `you can get a file on this subject from
rtfm.mit.edu:/pub/news.answers/writing/resources' are easy to `hyperfy'.)



[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@landfield.com

© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved