> 3) WC *did* post on this list last year giving full infos on how
> to get the CD, how to give them the latest revision, how to cor-
> rect errors, and *how to deny your consent to publication*.
This is an important point I believe in a couple ways. Folks should
not think that last time there was no attempt to contact. On the other
hand, last time like this time it was a negative response setup.
> 4) WC doesn't charge an unreasonable sum. Getting the same in-
> formations via modem costs you more than the CD, at least here in
> Europe. In Italy, it costs > 35 US$ for the phone bill alone
> (same area code), assuming 0 cost for the service provider.
Cost is not the issue. Getting fair recompense is not the issue. At
least not for me. I am not trying to keep anyone from seeing what
I wrote. I want WC to treat the authors of the documents the way they
would be treated if they were any other author. Plain and simple.
Obey the copyright law for FAQs like you would for novels, short stories,
etc. It's the same law.
--Larry W. Virden INET: lvirden@cas.org Personal: 674 Falls Place, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068-1614 Anything said in this email is my opinion, and not necessarily my employer's.
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved